In a tough spOtt: the man-douche
- Thread starter Sleepkyng
- Start date
- Status
Maklershed
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 77 (100%)
First
corrosivefrost
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 45 (100%)
interesting. yeah. that must be what i'm feeling.
prmononoke
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 1 (100%)
Holy shit, I just read throught 15 pages of tits and...whatever else there was, I can't remember it.
Oh yeah! OiNk invites! Does anyone have one to spare? I would be most, most grateful.
Also, school sucks, and I have papers to write.
Oh yeah! OiNk invites! Does anyone have one to spare? I would be most, most grateful.
Also, school sucks, and I have papers to write.
corrosivefrost
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 45 (100%)
[quote name='Hex']A long road to the next, the h0rz predicts.[/quote]
Whores?
Where?
Whores?
Where?
prmononoke
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 1 (100%)
[quote name='Hex']Reminds me of an old nickname I had... Whorse. :lol:[/quote]
Well that's appetizing.
Well that's appetizing.
corrosivefrost
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 45 (100%)
[quote name='Hex']Reminds me of an old nickname I had... Whorse. :lol:[/quote]
hoarse?
hoarse?
D
Dick Tracy
Guest
I fell asleep after work, yesterday... and just woke up a little while ago.
I think I was asleep for over twenty hours...
I think I was asleep for over twenty hours...
corrosivefrost
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 45 (100%)
[quote name='Brak']I fell asleep after work, yesterday... and just woke up a little while ago.
I think I was asleep for over twenty hours...[/quote]
Refresco!
I think I was asleep for over twenty hours...[/quote]
Refresco!
Cormier6083
CAGiversary!
Only (insert religous figure here) can save us now.
, it's really hard to find a logic board for my iMac. This sucks.
, it's really hard to find a logic board for my iMac. This sucks.
prmononoke
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 1 (100%)
[quote name='Hex']I'll leave it to your imagination as to why the nickname fit. 
[/quote]
As I said before, that's appetizing.
[/quote] As I said before, that's appetizing.
corrosivefrost
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 45 (100%)
This was somewhat amusing...
Apparently, there's a man, Scott Williams, who lives in Newport, RI. Scott likes to dig things up in his backyard during his spare time and sends what he finds to the Smithsonian Institute believing them to be real archaelogical finds. The following is a response from the Smithsonian to Scott Williams.
[quote name='Smithsonian Curator']
Smithsonian Institute
207 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20078
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D,
layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull." We have
given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to
inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents
conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two
million years ago.
Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll,
of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to
be "Malibu Barbie." It is evident that you have given a great deal of
thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain
that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were
loathe to come to contradiction with your findings.
However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the
specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:
1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically
fossilized bone.
2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic
centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified
proto-homonids.
3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the
common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene
clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.
This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses
you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the
evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too
much detail, let us say that:
A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has
chewed on.
B. Clams don't have teeth.
It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request
to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy
load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to
carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic
record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior
to 1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate
results.
Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National
Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning
your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino.
Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of
your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species
name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might
be Latin.
However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating
specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it
is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work
you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our
Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display
of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and
the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in
your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard.
We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed
in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay
for it.
We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories
surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a
structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex
femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty
9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.
Yours in Science,
Harvey Rowe
Chief Curator-Antiquities[/QUOTE]
Apparently, there's a man, Scott Williams, who lives in Newport, RI. Scott likes to dig things up in his backyard during his spare time and sends what he finds to the Smithsonian Institute believing them to be real archaelogical finds. The following is a response from the Smithsonian to Scott Williams.
[quote name='Smithsonian Curator']
Smithsonian Institute
207 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20078
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D,
layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull." We have
given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to
inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents
conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two
million years ago.
Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll,
of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to
be "Malibu Barbie." It is evident that you have given a great deal of
thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain
that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were
loathe to come to contradiction with your findings.
However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the
specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:
1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically
fossilized bone.
2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic
centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified
proto-homonids.
3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the
common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene
clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.
This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses
you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the
evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too
much detail, let us say that:
A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has
chewed on.
B. Clams don't have teeth.
It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request
to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy
load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to
carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic
record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior
to 1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate
results.
Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National
Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning
your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino.
Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of
your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species
name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might
be Latin.
However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating
specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it
is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work
you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our
Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display
of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and
the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in
your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard.
We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed
in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay
for it.
We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories
surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a
structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex
femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty
9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.
Yours in Science,
Harvey Rowe
Chief Curator-Antiquities[/QUOTE]
Cormier6083
CAGiversary!
^^^^ Quite amusing
[quote name='s1eepinglionhart']This was somewhat amusing...
Apparently, there's a man, Scott Williams, who lives in Newport, RI. Scott likes to dig things up in his backyard during his spare time and sends what he finds to the Smithsonian Institute believing them to be real archaelogical finds. The following is a response from the Smithsonian to Scott Williams.[/quote]
wow. peoplez r smrt. s-m-r-t- smrt.
Apparently, there's a man, Scott Williams, who lives in Newport, RI. Scott likes to dig things up in his backyard during his spare time and sends what he finds to the Smithsonian Institute believing them to be real archaelogical finds. The following is a response from the Smithsonian to Scott Williams.[/quote]
wow. peoplez r smrt. s-m-r-t- smrt.
crystalklear64
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 7 (100%)
Hmm.. sounds like something anyone could do. I wouldn't mind an official letter from the Smithsonian for the garbage in my backyard.
Cormier6083
CAGiversary!
[quote name='jPoD']And you people go apeshit over my OTTs?[/quote]
It's okay jPod, everyone is just jealous of your OTTs.
It's okay jPod, everyone is just jealous of your OTTs.
an anchient mastodon was found in a pond a few towns away.
Cormier6083
CAGiversary!
[quote name='jPoD'] I know they havent been great,[/quote]
You said it and I didn't.
Unless you get me a deal on a 333 MHz iMac G3 Logic Board with the porcessor and still works, maybe I'll bribe the mod to ban everyone for you
You said it and I didn't.
Unless you get me a deal on a 333 MHz iMac G3 Logic Board with the porcessor and still works, maybe I'll bribe the mod to ban everyone for you
sblymnlcrymnl
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 95 (99%)
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']i probably shouldn't be sharing this, but at one point i had several different parts of my body pierced. being that I had to have an MRI of my spine a few months back, I had to take them all out, which was a story in it's own right.[/QUOTE] You probably aren't going to share that story with us, are you? :lol:
My gf said once (I don't remember how it came up) that she didn't understand why anyone would around and get something "functional" (nipples, penis, clit) pierced. All of her piercings are/have been above the neck line. :lol:
My gf said once (I don't remember how it came up) that she didn't understand why anyone would
around and get something "functional" (nipples, penis, clit) pierced. All of her piercings are/have been above the neck line. :lol:[quote name='sblymnlcrymnl']You probably aren't going to share that story with us, are you? :lol:
My gf said once (I don't remember how it came up) that she didn't understand why anyone would around and get something "functional" (nipples, penis, clit) pierced. All of her piercings are/have been above the neck line. :lol:[/quote]
well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.
My gf said once (I don't remember how it came up) that she didn't understand why anyone would
around and get something "functional" (nipples, penis, clit) pierced. All of her piercings are/have been above the neck line. :lol:[/quote]well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago (
you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.
jPoD
Banned
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE]
PIX! (dont hurt me)
you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE]PIX! (dont hurt me
)
crazytalkx
CAGiversary!
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE]
:shock:
k
you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE]:shock:
k
- Feedback
- 740 (100%)
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox).[/quote]
And if you won that bet?
you redsox).[/quote]And if you won that bet?
sblymnlcrymnl
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 95 (99%)
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE] That's some story. And quite the unfortunate bet. :lol:
I too want to know what would have happened if you won.k
you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/QUOTE] That's some story. And quite the unfortunate bet. :lol:I too want to know what would have happened if you won.
k
[quote name='jPoD']And you people go apeshit over my OTTs?[/quote]
It's quite possibly a combination of people not liking you and shitty OTTs.
In other news, DKC on the VC today. Hell yeah! Too bad I don't have any Wii points. Gotta go to BB...
Edit: Aw,. Beat all my unlocked recipes in Cooking Mama and only have 75. Apparantly I missed one. Guess I'll print out a recipe tree FAQ and see where I missed it. :[
It's quite possibly a combination of people not liking you and shitty OTTs.
In other news, DKC on the VC today. Hell yeah! Too bad I don't have any Wii points. Gotta go to BB...
Edit: Aw,
. Beat all my unlocked recipes in Cooking Mama and only have 75. Apparantly I missed one. Guess I'll print out a recipe tree FAQ and see where I missed it. :[
A
Apossum
Guest
why do men even have nipples...these things are useless.
edit: the only use I can think of is if you want a sex change, the nipples will make your boobs look more "authentic."
edit: the only use I can think of is if you want a sex change, the nipples will make your boobs look more "authentic."
Miss Sunshine
CAG Veteran
[quote name='Apossum']why do men even have nipples...these things are useless.
edit: the only use I can think of is if you want a sex change, the nipples will make your boobs look more "authentic."[/quote]
We made a list of things in class once of all the things that were useless, man nipples were one of them. But the only one that really comes to mind is the appendix, but maybe that's because I've been bombarded with that fact since I was little. >:0
edit: the only use I can think of is if you want a sex change, the nipples will make your boobs look more "authentic."[/quote]
We made a list of things in class once of all the things that were useless, man nipples were one of them. But the only one that really comes to mind is the appendix, but maybe that's because I've been bombarded with that fact since I was little. >:0
[quote name='XchikaXchikaX']well, i got my clit pierced cuz i lost a bet on the world series several years ago ( you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/quote]
Oh ow. Do not want. I can't even begin to fathom why people want their genitals pierced.
you redsox). i'd had it for a while and it hadn't been "optimally positioned" if you know what i mean, so I didn't ever think about it, kinda forgot it was there. then, I had to have an MRI and about an hour before, i realized it was there and I hadn't tried to ever remove it, so I figured i should try to remove it. i remember when i had it done to begin with, the guy said he was tightening it extra tight because of its location and that it can get "friction" down there. anyways, i couldn't get it out. the thing was so tight, i had to find a peircing place around here and have them remove it for me because it had been tightened with pliers back in the day. it was rather embarassing.[/quote]Oh ow. Do not want. I can't even begin to fathom why people want their genitals pierced.
crystalklear64
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 7 (100%)
[quote name='Hex']Oh ow. Do not want. I can't even begin to fathom why people want their genitals pierced. [/QUOTE]
Increased pleasurez?
[/QUOTE]Increased pleasurez?
sblymnlcrymnl
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 95 (99%)
[quote name='Miss Sunshine']We made a list of things in class once of all the things that were useless, man nipples were one of them. But the only one that really comes to mind is the appendix, but maybe that's because I've been bombarded with that fact since I was little. >:0[/QUOTE] What about the uvula? Doesn't seem to have a purpose either.
- Status
bread's done