[quote name='SL4IN']have you even played the games? I'm assuming not. Granted, the graphics don't look awe inspiring or as good as Gears of War (which I'm assuming is the standard to most people because when games don't look like that, people get all hot and heavy and start denouncing the graphics) but it's not a bad looking games. The animations are fluid, it runs really smooth and the graphics are decent.
can you please point me to another game that he acted like it was dog shit in the review? His tone wasn't needed and he made the games seem like it's the horrible piece of trash and eidos should be ashamed to make it. Please, please tell me the difference between this game and gears other than the graphics. what does have gears have that K&L doesn't? A slightly better cover system and slightly cooler looking guns? Gears still has a short story, language, unrelatable characters and an extremely slow moving pace. I fail to see how Gears is "end all be all" third person shooter.
Straight up, I played the game. I played a great deal of and enjoyed it. It's not worth $60, but at $40, i'd certainly pick it up, possibly even $50. It's a decent game. The animations run smooth, fire fights are fun, the story is interesting, the character development over the course of the game is really good, it's got very good voice acting and the actual gunplay is decent. And, you also have to love how the only level they showed in the video is the first chapter of the first level. yeah, I'm guessing Jeff didn't even bother to play this one.[/quote]
kane and lynch is one game, IIRC.
what does gears have that kane and lynch doesn't?
THE COLE-TRAIN BAY-BEEEEEEE.