1:
My instructions stated were:
Here's the video, please right click it and click watch on youtube, and follow the instructions.
--------------
Now, you're saying my instructions weren't clear enough.
is it my that you didn't watch the video for the instructions?
2:
a. LottaGames: "So if you're not doing it for subscribers then I'm entering here, thanks. Let me know if I win.
b. Me: Learn to read/listen next time man:
This is a celebration for reaching 400 subscribers, this is him giving back to his already current subscribers, but it's also open to new subscribers.
Not to mention this rule is said at least 3-5 times between the 2 videos, and is mentioned in the description:
"1. Subscribe to ELTheGeek and HybridGamingNation"
"If you do not meet all of the requirements, you are ineligible to win"
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, that might sound rude/blunt, but that's because it's in text, and text can be percieved as rude and blunt 24/7.
3.
LottaGames: "I didn't watch the videos. He said it's not for subscribers so I left an entry here. If that's not good enough then I'm not signing up."
---------------------------------------------------
His excuse for not following the rules to the giveaway is that he read it isn't to gain subscribers, and it isn't, but the rules were in the video, which he refuses to watch for no reason whatsoever, to see that the rules are quite simple; and if he had watched the videos, none of this would be happening now.
4.
Me: "The give away is to give back to his subscribers, if you're not one of his subscribers, you're ineligible to compete.
Your loss, a free game is simply a click away.
You might want to lose your false sense of internet pride one of the days, buddy.
PS: Next time you enter a give away, how about you actually follow the rules."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, once again, what might sound rude/blunt here is only because it is in text. I told him to loose his sense of internet pride that he has for not wanting to watch a video or subscribe, when it could benefit him.
Now, if that insulted him, that's pathetic on his part, cause it wasn't intended to insult him, or to be rude; and if it really did insult him - then I'd imagine he gets insulted when dogs look at him with their head tilted sideways.
5.
a. You(Needler): (Quoting me)"Now, before you say we're doing this to get subscribers for our channels; NO, we are not; this was ORIGINALLY meant for our existing subscribers, and as a celebration for ELTheGeek reaching 400 subscribers."
b. Me: "It's been stated multiple times that new subscribers are welcome, because unlike alot of other channels, we are generous and actually care for our subscribers.
Continue nitpicking and you will be marked ineligible to compete in this giveaway, and future giveaways; PERIOD, subscriber - or not"
---------------------------------------------
Now, for this, you're saying that by your knowledge that it's not for new people. When clearly if you hadn't cut out the rest of the quote here:
"This is solely to inform people that they can win a free copy of Bulletstorm or Killzone 3.
So, if you would like to enter for the chance win a free copy of Bulletstorm or Killzone 3, please click the link, and follow the videos instructions to be entered to win." - You would've stated the part that says that OTHERS CAN ENTER ASWELL.
And as to the "Nitpicking", was it rude? possibly, but I say no in this case, because at that period in time, I thought the person who posted that was Lotta, instead of you; which I only recently discovered was you(Needler) shortly before I posted this post, and that, I apologise for.
The next post from you about my Ego needless to say needs no explanation, as I thought this was still Lotta - and, the statement I replied with was infact true.
5.
LottaGames: "Yeah, the rules were not clear and implied I could enter here. Instead the first post was a lie and it IS intended to raise subscriber count.
So I choose between subscribing for some goofy movie or losing a free game. I think I don't want the game then. Not worth it. "
---------------------------------------------------
Now, if he had WATCHED THE VIDEO as directed, he would've seen how clear the rules were - but no, he has to much pride to watch the rules, and then continues to call me a liar and a fraud, simply because he hasn't watched the video.
The rest I don't even need to get into because it's recent enough to where you can see it and understand from there.
And also, there was no 3rd person, I haven't deleted not one post on this forum, nor do I know how to.
Also, sorry for the messiness of this post, I'm not forum savvy enough to do multi-quotes.
