[quote name='dothog']The "trying too hard" comment was vague. Sorry about that.
They try too hard in one sense in that I see more than I'd like of large, highly specialized pieces to give a build a slicker look. One example is the space shuttle. The entire nose, IIRC, is one huge molded piece. They could've easily put in 15-20 small pieces to approximate the rounded, slick look of that shuttle nose, but instead they took a shortcut (IMO). That nose is forever the "space shuttle piece," most kids aren't using that in their made-up builds.
They're LEGO, by their nature they are modular and versatile. Maybe people are sick of the brick look and they like one "finished" piece that flies in the face of everything being bricky. I'm new to town, I think that's lame, they're friggin LEGO, they're bricks, I'm not sculpting in clay and I don't expect it to look like it.
A nit pickier example of flash in the City sets is the Police Station. IIRC it's got a lower smaller building that connects to a larger building on the right. That larger building is composed mostly of huge windows -- windows everywhere. It's too futuristic, too stark. Especially for LEGO. Where's the brick in that sheet of windows? I realize this point is more aesthetic, as at least all those windows could easily be used in other builds.
But most of all, for what they're offering up now under the City theme (I've seen tons of cop stuff, a little firefighter, nothing too exciting for what they are), the City sets are unnecessarily pricey. I can see why the branded Star Wars and Harry Potter give a lousy return on bricks per buck, but why are the City sets -- or rather, what I've seen of them -- so expensive?
An example is the big yellow truck. It's not like it's an Imperial Cargo Transport or the Hogwarts Express Sleeping Car. It's a big, bland banana of a yellow truck. Why is it ~$35 for not even 300 pieces?
I guess I'm learning the ropes, here. Apologies for going on, but there's a bit more on the "trying too hard" comment. It's dodgy on look, utility, and price is a better way of putting it.[/QUOTE]
Yeah you are just being nit picky. :lol:
The "shuttle nose" is actually an airplane nose from a few years back. If you want a shuttle than buy the $100 one with 1000+ pieces. The reason the $30 shuttle uses that nose is it's cheaper than using several pieces that LEGO doesn't have in the factory right now. LEGO has a price point for a set and they use the cheapest pieces to get to that point. If you want a building that has bricks then buy the Creator houses or the huge $150 sets.
LEGO prices haven't gone up in 20 years, they were pretty much the same price from 1985 to 2005 even as oil prices rose. Recently LEGO prices have gone through the roof and no one really understands why the City sets this year cost so much, it really is insane. Wait until the new Harbor theme comes out, it's insanely priced. However everything had windows, and bricks, it's not like windows are new. Where were the bricks in the old style castles with huge piece walls? LEGO has always had some big pieces but no one complained when they were children. I think part of you is thinking about to happier, care free days and that LEGO was perfect when it wasn't. It's not perfect today, and it's not the same, but it evolved to a place where the sets aren't horrible. Someone here brought up the 1998 Town sets, look at Town between 1998 and like 2002, the sets are horrible, LEGO came very close to going bankrupt and being sold. LEGO used to make 120-150 sets a year, they now make 400-500 new sets a year. There is something for everyone, this year just happens to be a horrible year for City. You missed the great Coast Guard theme from a year years back. Plus Pirates wasn't too bad either, but PotC killed that.
Right now there is a ton of shit in the catalog (and I didn't get my free game!), it's probably the worst half a year for LEGO in awhile. The new PotC sets look good, but have no canons(!), the new Alien Conquest sets also look good, and the big tank set looks like classic space and new style mixed together. The new Kingdoms set, while stupidity named, look amazing, have bricks and are pretty well priced (for the most part).
With LEGO making so many more sets than they used to, so buy a Log Cabin, it has bricks and is cheap. Something for everyone.
Why doesn't LEGO make old sets? The molds could be broken for some pieces and are out of print. However someone asked LEGO why they don't make LEGO Legend sets like they used to in the early 2000s. The honest answer was that LEGO makes better sets now (once again the 1988-2002 years were really bad and remaking older sets isn't necessary, but also they don't sell as well as LEGO thought they would. Tastes in LEGO sets has changed and even all the adults going "We'd buy them" doesn't actually happen.
If you really want to know LEGO's thinking, look into reading the 2010 LEGO Annual Report. It's on their website, it's interesting to see what sells and what doesn't and what the companies thinking is. What I found most intersting is in 2007 the best selling set of the year was the fire station...
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=7945-1
Very few bricks (no side walls) and a lot of windows and open space, and it still sold well