Quackzilla needs to change his avatar to a picture of him performing fellatio on a PSP.
It's a neat idea, and $2 isn't bad. I don't think that the "I can get it for free if I download it illegally" holds as an argument, especially if you consider the success Apple has had in the music market facing the same kind of competition. I won't partake in it, myself (I already own an iPod), but this will (perhaps) inevitably lead to movie downloads via iTunes, something entirely cool IMO. Would you pay $5 to download new releases to watch on your iPod?
For
's sake, Quack thinks that paying $15-$25 for UMD movies (which I have nothing against, BTW) is a genius idea, but $2 for a
ing television show is too much? You are easily the single dumbest frequent CAG I've encountered.
Of course, if they strip the advertisements from the shows, that's some major incentive (though, what do you think of legal tv downloads that include/force you to watch ads, so long as they were free?).