mario golf, zelda windwaker and fzero gc fact sealed ft

Will

Will

CAGiversary!
Feedback
105 (100%)
non players choice box. bought a few extras for trade bait from frys...looking for sealed or like new gc and xbox games in return. reply with a list of what youve got to offer.
 
I have Splinter cell pandora tomorrow. Mint complete, but it has the blockbuster sticker on the disc. I can probably remove it.

Interested in mario golf.
 
not interested in ex-rentals

[quote name='levi333']I have Splinter cell pandora tomorrow. Mint complete, but it has the blockbuster sticker on the disc. I can probably remove it.

Interested in mario golf.[/quote]
 
Prime example of why i dont check lists anymore. If you didnt wanna trade it, shouldnt have offered it on your list. Instead of wasting peoples time, just list what youre willing to offer.
 
Thanks but ill pass on those two.

[quote name='BITADE']Do you want The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind -- Game of the Year Edition
like new (XBOX)

XIII (PS2) NEW[/quote]
 
Since I don't know if you got my PM or if you even bother to check lists, I'll post what I'd be willing to give for either/or Mario Golf or Zelda WW

Amplitude(ps2) - Sealed
Wild Arms 3 (ps2)- Sealed
Resident Evil Dead Aim (ps2) - Mint
X-2 Wolverine's Revenge (xbox)- Sealed
Blood Wake (xbox) - Almost mint, case has a little ding on it, but disc looks good.
World Series Basebal 2k3(xbox) - Sealed
Metal Arms (xbox) - Sealed

I'm willing to trade multiple games for either Zelda or Mario Golf, except for Metal Arms and Dead Aim, those I'd only do 1 for 1.
 
Last time I checked, Mario Party 4 still sells for $50 new. As for VJ, Nachzeher was right - for me it's just worth a little bit more due to being a non-PC version and harder to find.

[quote name='Stink_Pickle']Youre right, my bad, a 19.99 or less game for a 19.99 or less game isnt fair...my apologies.[/quote]
 
I bought my copy of mario party 4 at my best buy for 14.99, 19.99 w/gamers card. I guess it would be just as easy to go buy another i need.
 
[quote name='Stink_Pickle']I bought my copy of mario party 4 at my best buy for 14.99, 19.99 w/gamers card. I guess it would be just as easy to go buy another i need.[/quote]

Most Best Buys probably don't even carry it anymore. I know BB.com doesn't. And why would you want two copies of the same game anyway. It's one thing when you buy two $5 games at a store, one for you and one for trade. But to try and trade someone for a game that you already have and then complain when they won't do it? That's just asinine. Your clinging to this subject, that should have been dropped long ago (face it; he doesn't see it as a fair trade, and your being rude isn't going to change things), just sounds to me like maybe you were trying to swap a game that you know will bring $15 max used for a game that you might be able to harangue $25 or $30 out of someone else with. And it made you angry that he didn't fall for it. I know I don't know your thoughts, but that's what it sounded like to me. You need to calm down. I've made many an offer on here that was turned down. The stuff you want to trade for belongs to them, not you. They get to decide. Not you. You only can decide for your half of the transaction. So just drop the issue.
 
LOL..thats the best line of crap ive heard in quite some time. Im putting a gamecube bundle together for my nieces and nephews. You aint gotta believe it if you dont want and thats fine. I dont see you bitching at the others keeping that line of argument going so screw you. Im not mad in the least bit he didnt wanna make the trade. Its the fact that people arent willing to make the offer based on what they think the games are worth to them, instead they say check my list, giving the impression everything on that list is available for the the game(s) they want. Big waste of time.
 
I don't care if you're putting a bundle together for the Sultan of Brunai. The point of what I said is that he doesn't want to do it and that's his prerogative. The games belong to him. Your purpose in purchase does not change that fact. And your vulgarities show just how defensive you are and how much you know you are wrong. And your calling your rants an argument is totally and utterly false. You are carrying on a pseudo-argument, maybe, just to make yourself feel better. And your last line makes no sense. Just because someone says, "Check my list," does not mean that they are not offering based on what the game is worth. That's exactly what he is doing. He doesn't see your game as worth it, so he's not offering. He didn't say, "Take anything on my list." He said "Check." So, hypothetical situation: if someone had a complete, mint, Steel Battalion for trade and it was on their list, and they asked someone for one of the $2 games from the Overstock deal, and they told them to "Check my list," you would expect them to hand over the Steel Battalion? That is an extreme case, but the same principle: differing views of value. Like I said, your claims are asinine.
 
if this is a pointless psuedo argument, why do you keep replying? Youll have to forgive me if i see a 19.99 game for a 19.99 game fair, if he doesnt, im fine with that. Again, its the part of people saying check my list, implying everything on that is ft vs being up front and saying "this is what im willing to offer" and dropping that list vs making people waste their time in hopes they pick the worst shit on their list vs something decent.
 
I never said pointless. Showing someone how they err has great merit, if they will listen. But I have given it a few tries and you continue to spout obscenities (again showing the level of defense and/or intelligence you have), which immediately makes almost anyone give you zero credit in what you have to say. Furthermore, you completely ignored the Steel Battalion analogy. It is more than completely reasonable for someone to expect 1 1/2 to 2 times the value of a game they want for a game you are asking for when they view their game at a higher value. That doesn't mean it's not on the table, just the requirements for the deal have not been satisfied. You have simply proven yourself to be a fanatic and have possibly taken credit away from yourself (I know I would be less likely to trust that you were shooting straight with me on a deal) with others who have watched your spinning the issue in this subject. He never said that he was unwilling to trade those games in any circumstance, he just didn't like the deal and decided to pass. And until you prove that he would never give those games up, there is nothing wrong with having them on the trade list. Trade lists do not always equal a one to one trade ratio.
Like I said, you are simply a fanatic and cannot be swayed by God Himself. And as such, the only thing I could possibly do is offer to buy you a coke if I ever saw you and drop the subject right now. Have a nice day. :beer:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top