[quote name='jimbodan']I find it funny that if they had just beat up the kid instead of drawing him, they'd be in far less trouble.[/quote]
I think that speaks to a lot of the problems most of us have with this issue, free speech argument or not. If they kids had beaten the kid up (no knives or noose) they would have probably gotten suspended or maybe even just a simple detention, but i highly doubt the authorities would have gotten involved.
Also, kids drawing stick-figures beating each other up is nothing new to schools, and its a little ridiculous to charge 9 and 10 year olds with a felony. Have you guys forgotten that 9 and 10 year old kids are still in elementary school? not even middle school?
Look, i respect your ability to express yourself through your art or whatever you want to do, but i have to say this is a little different. I still think arresting the kids was a retarded move, but i don't think their drawings were protected by free-speech (whether inside school or not). The drawings depicted a specific threat to a specific individual, that's too much of a threat to be considered "art." Having said that, this was still something that the parents and school should have handled. This was a classic case of an over-eager assistant principal (or something like that, most likely) who wanted his career moves to look good and acted without fully considering his (stupid) actions.