[quote name='sn0b0ards'][quote name='epobirs']
I think you have a distorted concept of how much information is held within 38 kilobytes. That is just 38,000 characters in ASCII, less in Unicode. Leaving off the definition data and just creating a list of unique words within contemporary English, if you figure an average of five characters per word, this only offers 7600 words. A very minimal dictionary. Work in all the definition data and thesaurus entries, etc. and you've got something a good deal larger before you've even gotten into the issue of translation. A decent database of contemporary English is going to run closer to a megabyte.
Which isn't a problem. Games like Mario DS already consume about 10 megabytes and the DS cartridge design allows for substantially more. The current spec offered by Nintendo goes up to 1 gigabit AKA 128 megabytes. Currently that would make for a very pricey game but Nintendo is expecting the cost to bring it within reason within the DS's lifetime. They can offer larger capacities but that is the maximum for which all the engineering has already been performed and can be readily ordered by third party publishers. It's entirely possible if certain types of data intensive applications become popular we'll much higher capacities.
[/quote]
First of all, I have a very extensive knowledge of how much information is held in different amounts of data, but apparently you don't because 128 MB is no where near 1GB. There are 1024 Megabytes in 1 Gigabyte.
I do this stuff for a living kid. The reason I said 38KB was because my team was going to implement a spell checker for a linux project, and someone mentioned the size - it can be as small as 38KB to still have an effective listing of the most common english words. Yes a full library with more like 300K words would be more like a Megabyte, but my point was to show you do not need much space for it. (although a megabyte still is not much)[/quote]
Ha ha, it's always amusing that the more wrong a person is, the more vehemently they attack others.
1 gigabit is not equal to 1 gigabyte, but 1 gigabit certainly does equal 128 megabytes. So the 'kid' was right, and you were wrong... nyah nyah nyah
