"Palin hates the environment" from Alaskan professor

Koggit

CAGiversary!
Feedback
3 (100%)
I thought this was really interesting.

Climate change. Although Alaska is ground zero in the crisis of global warming, Palin has done virtually nothing to address the problem except hold meetings and appoint a "climate sub-cabinet" that likewise has done little. Lots of talk, no action. Although in the past two years the Arctic summer sea ice shrunk to the lowest levels ever recorded, Palin apparently does not believe it is human-induced or cause for alarm. She was asked to establish an Alaska Office on Climate Change, an Alaska Climate Response Fund (based on a tax on Alaska oil production) and emissions reduction targets for Alaska, but has taken no action on those requests.

Polar bears. This summer, Palin filed suit against the Bush administration over the federal listing of polar bears as threatened, saying that her opposition was based on a "comprehensive scientific review." But when asked to release the scientific review, she refused. The document, later obtained by the public (from the federal government), clearly shows that, contrary to Palin's assertions, the state of Alaska's marine mammal scientists agreed with the federal conclusions that the polar bears are in serious trouble because of global warming and loss of their sea ice habitat, and that they would be gone from Alaska by 2050. Palin clearly decided to oppose the listing in order to protect Arctic oil and gas development, then publicly misrepresented the basis for her decision, and then tried to conceal all of that. Having run for office on a platform of honesty and transparency, this behavior was neither. Her extreme position here puts her to the political right of the Bush/Cheney administration.

Endangered species. Earlier this year, Palin approved a $2 million state appropriation for a conference on the "economic impacts" of the Endangered Species Act, designed to persuade the public that ESA listings were too costly and unwarranted. Recently she agreed to use the money instead to fund the state's lawsuit against the Bush administration over the polar bear listing -- a likely violation of the state constitutional provisions on appropriation. She opposes additional species listings and other protections in Alaska, where many species are at risk because of climate change and other threats.

Predator control. Palin approved and expanded the state's aerial predator control program, where wolves are shot from aircraft and bears hunted from aircraft and killed upon landing. This year, her state biologists even dragged 14 newborn wolf pups from their den and, having already shot their parents, then shot each of the pups in the head at close range. Last year, her administration offered a $150 bounty for each wolf killed until the bounty was ruled illegal by the courts. Hundreds of wolves are killed each year by this antiquated state program that has no scientific justification whatsoever, but rather is designed to appease Palin's urban sport hunter supporters.

Pebble mine. Palin aggressively opposed the "clean water initiative" on the August ballot in Alaska (which then failed), favoring instead foreign mining company desires for fewer government regulations controlling their toxic effluent into salmon streams. She has supported virtually any and all mining proposals that have come her way, even likely the enormous Pebble gold and silver mine proposed in the Bristol Bay watershed. That plan put at risk the largest runs of sockeye salmon in the world, where this summer fishermen caught more than 27 million salmon.

Oil and gas drilling. Palin has supported oil and gas drilling plans anywhere in Alaska, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the central Arctic, the entire Arctic Ocean, and in fish-rich Bristol Bay and Cook Inlet. On her watch, regulation and government oversight of Alaska oil facilities is terribly lacking, and she has declined to establish a citizens' advisory council to provide more effective public oversight of the expanding oil and gas operations in Arctic Alaska.

Exxon Valdez oil spill damages. Palin refuses to push Exxon to pay the government for the unanticipated environmental injuries from the disastrous 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. Almost 20 years later, the private case is still unresolved and the governments likewise have yet to collect full payment from Exxon. Shortly before Palin took office in 2006, the governments presented Exxon with a demand to pay $92 million for this additional environmental damage, but her administration has since not pressed the issue nor taken Exxon to court to collect the money. Meanwhile, Exxon reaps record profits from Alaska.

Trans Pacific shipping. Palin repeatedly has been asked by coastal residents and organizations to enhance the safety of merchant shipping through Alaska's Aleutian Islands, a primary shipping route between Asia and North America, but she's done nothing. Citizens want better vessel tracking, powerful rescue tugs along the route and a risk assessment. While her predecessor funded a scoping study, the Palin administration has not appropriated one dime to improve shipping safety through the Aleutians, and says it will take no further action to reduce risk for several years into the future.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/377955_palinenvir07.html?source=mypi

It seems the majority of her 'decisions' benefit industries with powerful lobbies... coincidence?
 
This is how you "take on" big oil. She's planning to give them so much money that they collapse in on themselves.

And since you can't see the genius of her plans you attack her! I think we should wait and see and not question things until after any horrible predictions have come true. Then we can discuss what we should have done instead.
 
[quote name='SpazX']This is how you "take on" big oil. She's planning to give them so much money that they collapse in on themselves.[/quote]

Why are you in a wheelchair, sir?

My wallet was so heavy it broke my spine.
 
This is an opinion piece with no sources listed, soooo...

Climate change. Although Alaska is ground zero in the crisis of global warming, Palin has done virtually nothing to address the problem except hold meetings and appoint a "climate sub-cabinet" that likewise has done little. Lots of talk, no action. Although in the past two years the Arctic summer sea ice shrunk to the lowest levels ever recorded, Palin apparently does not believe it is human-induced or cause for alarm. She was asked to establish an Alaska Office on Climate Change, an Alaska Climate Response Fund (based on a tax on Alaska oil production) and emissions reduction targets for Alaska, but has taken no action on those requests.

I really don't think this will change many conservatives minds. I guess he's just justifying liberals disliking Palin.

Polar bears. This summer, Palin filed suit against the Bush administration over the federal listing of polar bears as threatened, saying that her opposition was based on a "comprehensive scientific review." But when asked to release the scientific review, she refused. The document, later obtained by the public (from the federal government), clearly shows that, contrary to Palin's assertions, the state of Alaska's marine mammal scientists agreed with the federal conclusions that the polar bears are in serious trouble because of global warming and loss of their sea ice habitat, and that they would be gone from Alaska by 2050. Palin clearly decided to oppose the listing in order to protect Arctic oil and gas development, then publicly misrepresented the basis for her decision, and then tried to conceal all of that. Having run for office on a platform of honesty and transparency, this behavior was neither. Her extreme position here puts her to the political right of the Bush/Cheney administration.

This is one of those, I'd like to see a source ones, and I could see this hurting her, but only a little.

Endangered species. Earlier this year, Palin approved a $2 million state appropriation for a conference on the "economic impacts" of the Endangered Species Act, designed to persuade the public that ESA listings were too costly and unwarranted. Recently she agreed to use the money instead to fund the state's lawsuit against the Bush administration over the polar bear listing -- a likely violation of the state constitutional provisions on appropriation. She opposes additional species listings and other protections in Alaska, where many species are at risk because of climate change and other threats.

See above, I'd assume it would be the same source, and the misappropriation of funds would be more damaging than an opposition to polar bear listings.

Predator control. Palin approved and expanded the state's aerial predator control program, where wolves are shot from aircraft and bears hunted from aircraft and killed upon landing. This year, her state biologists even dragged 14 newborn wolf pups from their den and, having already shot their parents, then shot each of the pups in the head at close range. Last year, her administration offered a $150 bounty for each wolf killed until the bounty was ruled illegal by the courts. Hundreds of wolves are killed each year by this antiquated state program that has no scientific justification whatsoever, but rather is designed to appease Palin's urban sport hunter supporters.

This seems silly, appeasing urban sport hunters? C'mon... The bounty is one thing, but he's claiming there's no need for population control he could at least reference a study.

Pebble mine. Palin aggressively opposed the "clean water initiative" on the August ballot in Alaska (which then failed), favoring instead foreign mining company desires for fewer government regulations controlling their toxic effluent into salmon streams. She has supported virtually any and all mining proposals that have come her way, even likely the enormous Pebble gold and silver mine proposed in the Bristol Bay watershed. That plan put at risk the largest runs of sockeye salmon in the world, where this summer fishermen caught more than 27 million salmon.

Opposing the clean water initiative, that seems like it might be one of those, she opposed one proposal but supported a modified proposal that isn't mentioned (like mccain voting against vet benefits), but again he doesn't have any source soooo.

Oil and gas drilling. Palin has supported oil and gas drilling plans anywhere in Alaska, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the central Arctic, the entire Arctic Ocean, and in fish-rich Bristol Bay and Cook Inlet. On her watch, regulation and government oversight of Alaska oil facilities is terribly lacking, and she has declined to establish a citizens' advisory council to provide more effective public oversight of the expanding oil and gas operations in Arctic Alaska.

This certainly won't hurt her within the party. More and more people are starting to think that some drilling could be beneficial.

Exxon Valdez oil spill damages. Palin refuses to push Exxon to pay the government for the unanticipated environmental injuries from the disastrous 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. Almost 20 years later, the private case is still unresolved and the governments likewise have yet to collect full payment from Exxon. Shortly before Palin took office in 2006, the governments presented Exxon with a demand to pay $92 million for this additional environmental damage, but her administration has since not pressed the issue nor taken Exxon to court to collect the money. Meanwhile, Exxon reaps record profits from Alaska.

I have to claim ignorance on this one. But why is it Palin's responsibility to collect the money from Exxon? There were several different settlement, and if someone could connect the dots, well ya know.

Trans Pacific shipping. Palin repeatedly has been asked by coastal residents and organizations to enhance the safety of merchant shipping through Alaska's Aleutian Islands, a primary shipping route between Asia and North America, but she's done nothing. Citizens want better vessel tracking, powerful rescue tugs along the route and a risk assessment. While her predecessor funded a scoping study, the Palin administration has not appropriated one dime to improve shipping safety through the Aleutians, and says it will take no further action to reduce risk for several years into the future.

So her predecessor funded a study... my guess is is Palin only funded a study, then this guy would criticize her her for that saying she should have done more.



Anyway, I'm not trying to defend Palin on any of these, but I hate opinion pieces that get waved around with no sources listed. Shouldn't be that hard to post a couple of links or at least reference a report or something. Plus at least several of those points just seem like liberal high-fiving ("See I knew we disagreed on global warming and drilling! *high five*)
 
[quote name='SpazX']This is how you "take on" big oil. She's planning to give them so much money that they collapse in on themselves.[/QUOTE]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlK62rjQWLk

Ramstoria, I appreciate your skepticism, but given what little we know about Palin, would you dare suggest she's in favor of promoting the environment to the detriment of big business? (which is more or less a logical necessity if you think that she isn't siding with the pro-business side of everything that hits her desk)
 
[quote name='fatherofcaitlyn']Why are you in a wheelchair, sir?

My wallet was so heavy it broke my spine.[/QUOTE]
I couldn't help myself.
 
[quote name='elprincipe']I can't speak to the other allegations until I learn more about them, but she is certainly right (although possibly politically wrong) on the polar bear issue. Polar bear populations are booming, not declining, and they are certainly not "threatened." The listing of the polar bear as a threatened species was stupidity. See here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1545036/Polar-bears-'thriving-as-the-Arctic-warms-up'.html[/quote]

Doesn't really matter - for the most part polar bears have just been a political prop anyway.

The majority of people cannot comprehend the chaotic and detrimental effects of global warming, but it's guaranteed they'll feel sad for a poor drowning polar bear (never mind polar bears are some of the meanest mammals in nature)
 
[quote name='mykevermin']

Ramstoria, I appreciate your skepticism, but given what little we know about Palin, would you dare suggest she's in favor of promoting the environment to the detriment of big business? (which is more or less a logical necessity if you think that she isn't siding with the pro-business side of everything that hits her desk)[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't suggest that in the least. I just take opinion pieces with a grain of salt.
 
[quote name='camoor']Doesn't really matter - for the most part polar bears have just been a political prop anyway.

The majority of people cannot comprehend the chaotic and detrimental effects of global warming, but it's guaranteed they'll feel sad for a poor drowning polar bear (never mind polar bears are some of the meanest mammals in nature)[/QUOTE]

polar_bear_global_warming.jpg
 
[quote name='speedracer']Mean? Do they have the capacity to be mean?[/quote]

Of course there is some personification there (I'm talking in layman's terms) but I do think it's somewhat valid to metaphorically describe intelligent animals by comparing their behavior to personality traits (this goes for all intelligent animals, especially for intelligent mammals and primates)

For example, you may have heard that most monkies are 'inquisitive', dolphins are 'playful', or certain birds like the pectoral sandpiper are 'promiscuous'. Unless we're going to talk using long latin phrases like a couple of biologists, these are all valid observations IMO.
 
bread's done
Back
Top