I honestly can't stay quiet with all this stupid shit is being said about PC gaming.
[quote name='Malik112099']It is just simply WAY easier for the average consumer to buy a console and the games conveniently packaged with said console's name all over them. You buy the game, pop it in, it runs perfectly. This isn't the case with a PC. Installs? Directories? Resolutions? Full Scale AA? Shadows? Low, Medium, High, Custom? Consoles are TOO easy nowadays...
[/quote]
I guess its to hard for the average consumer to buy a PC game from the pc gaming section of the store with the other pc games.
Ive never seen someone buy a Playstation 3 game to try and play it in their xbox, and why in the hell would someone buy an Xbox game to think they can play it on their PC?
Console games do it run perfectly, they are also ridden with bugs just like some PC versions are.
Thats great if you are so stupid its hard to do a couple of mouse clicks and not know how to put 1 dvd in, and wait for an install.
It's not like you a writing the game in assembly.
Most PC games have an auto dectect setting to set the graphics at the level that is appropriate for your machine. Only people that know what AA,AF,etc go into the settings to mess with them. You dont start up the game to be approached with all these settings.
PC games are just as easy as a console, unless you are just too stupid to realize what a patch is.
A PC in a home theater setup is just plain impractical unless you buy a super small case and the specific components which fit, which is just too costly and a pain. I challenge you to build a $350 PC which runs games like Bioshock, COD4, Mass Effect or Assassin's Creed without a hitch. When console hardware is first released it is almost always sold at a loss while PC components are all sold for a profit.
I take your challenge.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=237787
That thing will run bioshock at a higher NATIVE resolution then your 360 will, and run it faster then your 360 will.
When ME comes out on PC, it will run better, and with less bugs and more stable framerate, then the 360 version is.
ME and Ass Creed were probably some of the buggiest console games ever. I will wait the 6 months so you 360 people can beta test the final PC version.
PC hardware makers have to make a profit because they dont get a slice from every pc game sold.
This is why PC games are 10-20 dollars cheaper on the average then the console counterparts.
Consoles are cheaper because they are mass produced, and with every game sold, the publisher has to give around 10 dollars to the hardware manufacturer(as a liscence fee).
Also, the PC is PC gaming's biggest enemy. I can use the PC to pirate games for itself! Yeah, you can pirate games on a console but the risk is MUCH higher (bricking the console as opposed to downloading a game that you can't get to run). It also takes a hell of a lot more time and balls to open up a console and mess with stuff you aren't familiar with - especially for Joe Bob Consumer.
Joe Bob Consumer has no clue what a torrent is, or how to crack a PC game, or how to read an .nfo, and most things.
Joe Bob consumer is an ignorant mother that thinks you need $100 HDMI cables, and that 1080p is "Full HD".
Pirating Games on a console is just as easy, as a pc, most consoles dont even need modchips to get it done.
It does not take alot of "balls" to open up a console, because they are mostly PCs whith everything solderd onto one PCB.
[quote name='dragonsho']If pc gaming was dead then there wouldn't be 50,000+ people playing Diablo 2, a game that's almost 10 years old, at any given time.
[/quote]
This.
Just because PC gamers stick with a game for hundreds of hours, and continue to enjoy it, and not play 3 hours of a 360 game and then trade it in for less then half of what they payed, does not mean that PC gaming is dead. It means that people on PCs dont see the need to always play the "flavor of the week" and then move on.
There are tons of people playing pc games, it's just that it isn't in the lime light like the consoles. Maybe because they've been around for so long or maybe people just want to think their console is better (i.e. fanboys) so they started a rumor that pc gaming is dead.
Its all cause of NPDs.
[quote name='thater']Thing is, that is the problem with PC gaming. Why hasn't something come out in the last almost 8 years (Diablo 2 released summer 2000) that can pull those gamers away from Diablo 2? Developers of so called AAA titles are striving for the best looking graphics which will not run on that 8 year old pc that can still run Diablo 2.
[/quote]
Its beacuse people still enjoy playing Diablo 2. On PC devs support their games, and release patches, instead of getting raped for 60 more dollars the next year to fix the problems with the previous games.
Now with consoles, games like Katamari Damacy, Loco Roco, Disgaea and others can find their way onto store shelves and get exposure and sales without AAA marketing behind them. There is a chance for these "Mid-Range" games on consoles.
Its true that you can't get Japanese Games on a PC, but we get all the indie games, and most of the time they are free.
People will pay for good games that they know they are getting from a trusted source. I think some of piracy comes from people not wanting to pay for a game that they are not sure how well it will run on their machine. Honestly, if you expect everyone to have to shell out $250-$300 for a new video card every six months to play your newest game, you have to expect some of them will not have the $50 left to pay for your game. I, for one, can't afford to upgrade like that, so I can't even run these new games.
This is crazy talk.
You could have bought a 8800gts 320mb, over a year and a half ago for less then 300 dollars, and you could still be playing the latest games at near max specs.
This is the problem. People always think that you need a 300 dollar graphics card every 6 months to play PC games. You could buy a 9600gt for around 180 dollars, and play every pc game for the next 3 years without a problem.
Im done trying to defend the pc around here because most of you console idiots dont understand what PC gaming is all about.
Go play your Gears at 1024x768 with 2x AA, and barely managing to get 30fps.
Ill play it on my PC at 1980x1200 with 16AF, and 8XAA, running at 60fps.
Ill also play the extra content you console gamers didnt get.
I also play online for free.
I also play it with my xbox 360 controller since thats what the game was designed for.
I will also play it on my 65" DLP TV.
[quote name='Chacrana']I think devs are finally starting to realize that people don't necessarily want something super-pretty - they want something fun.
, I don't think anyone would mind sacrificing graphical fidelity for great gameplay.[/quote]
I think this is what Nintendo was going for with the Wii, but 95% of the stuff that is not made by Nintendo is pure shit.
Its the average person that just wants pretty grphx, and devs spend to much time on that shit instead of just making
all awesome gameplay.