JolietJake
Banned
[quote name='lilboo']Well, yeah. It would be. I mean it's an observation. If you walked downtown in Birmingham, AL and you saw that..then it's OK to classify as the people in downtown as white rednecks or whatever you want to call them because that IS what YOU saw. There's a difference in saying "ALLLLL whites" are like that or "ALLLLL whites from Alabama are like that", hell, "ALL WHITES FROM BIRMINGHAM ARE LIKE THAT".. No. However, IF the majority of the white people from Birmingham that YOU saw WERE like that.. well, your just saying what you see. What's wrong with that?
know what you're saying, i mean, i grew up in rural LA with a lot of racial tension, and i've heard my family members come visit me here in seattle and say stuff like "if our blacks acted like your blacks, i wouldn't have a problem with them"... and that sorta thought is just divisive, race is not affecting their behavior so it's wrong to classify the behavior of a social group by that group's predominant race..But where I live..I do notice a difference in areas where the majority of blacks are. In my parents area, all the black people are just... black people. They are people. They are just whatever. They blend in with the society around them. The majority of the ones from Philly really stood out and they were the kind you didn't want as a neighbor. Again, I ask, what is wrong with wanting certain things and observing stuff?
Boo, if you just stop saying "black people" and just say "people", i'd mostly agree with you. The way people act has nothing to do with their race, it's how they were taught to act. If you want to know why they act a certain way, look back at their parents and how they were raised and influenced.
People from different backgrounds act differently, i've met rude people from basically every race on earth, but i don't lump their entire race in with them.