[quote name='electrictroy']Naked bodies are NOT pornography. Especially not the "College Girls" issue I was requesting (which are just amateurs). Good God. Some of you would see a "photos from nudist beach" and call it porn. That's just... stupid. Incredibly stupid. Naked bodies are just naked bodies. The End.
It doesn't become pornography until the sex starts.
troy[/QUOTE]
Pornography is sexually explicity material that is meant to produce arousal. Now, somehow I doubt you mean to look at College girl issues of playboy for a purpose beyond becoming sexually aroused.
That being said, I find it a lot easier to define all nudity as sexually explicit and pornographic, but being able to distinguish different levels of pornographic content, hence the terms "softcore", "hardcore" and other such terms.
It seems obvious that you wish to obscure these definitions. Claiming that at some point art becomes pornography, but that they are mutually exclusive. Or that photography can be non-pornographic, but both sexually explicit and meant to produce arousal. At which point, I question your definition.
However, quite simply art can be pronographic, and pornography can be art. It all happens in degrees. Is a painting of a woman naked and spreading her legs any less artistic than a painting of a woman just being topless? You aren't going to sit there and jerk off to it, but, it certainly is sexually explicit and can be arousing.