[quote name='Quackzilla'][quote name='epobirs'][quote name='Quackzilla']Actually, seeing how everything is tightly secured it should be more durable than the DS, which has a fragile screen.[/quote]
Were you giggling when you wrote that or did you really keep a straight face? Are you actually trying to suggest the clamshell design of the DS, used in a vast range of products with similar screens to great satisfaction, is somehow placing the screen at some added risk compared to the perpetually exposed PSP screen? Such nonsense really isn't advancing the conversation.
[/quote]
Are you oblivious to physics?
Clamshell designs do not protect impact damage at all.
Following Newtons first law of motion, inertia, the internal components will stay in motion after the unit hits the ground. If they are not properly secured they will break.
And can someone tell me what the problem is? A video game site reports some dead pixels, fanboys start speculating, and all of a sudden the PSP launch is a total disaster with a 100% manufacturing flaw rate?
Wtf?[/quote]
While that is true, you ignore the fact that if something gets dropped on a PSP it has a good chance of hitting the screen. Whereas with the DS if something gets dropped on a DS odds are it is closed so it won't crack the screen. And if you think that a protected screen can't get hurt by something small getting dropped on it, you need to take a look at my cellphone. It had a key ring with 2 keys on it dropped from a height of no more than 1.5 feet and that thing damn near exploded. And that is a tiny screen. Think of what the PSP's huge screen could have happen to it.
Obviously you are the fanboy here. I'm surprised nonggamer (or whatever the hell his name is) hasn't come in yet. He's probably praying this isn't true and making voodoo dolls targeting those who posted in here.