[quote name='mykevermin']Can you do anything other than cite largely-mythological "welfare queen" creatures so as to falsely discern between "deserving" and "undeserving" citizens? Can you do anything but make it a minority issue (since you had to throw in "can't-speak-English)? A gender issue (since we know only women are responsible for having children, as evidenced by your "cow-whore" argument)?
In other words, in all your vitriol, what have you to prove your case, other than hypothetical anecdotes conjured, not from reality, but from the stereotypes in your mind, to emotively bring people in to your women-and-minority-and-immigrant hate festival?
Take a

ing powder. Rub one off. Have a stiff drink (I know it's still early). But get off your high horse of righteousness when you're nothing but full of shit.[/QUOTE]
This is highly amusing coming from you, myke. Your stereotypical, self-righteous, anecdotal rants about the inequities of the minority capitalists who exploit the worker for undeserved and unshared profit are mirrored in your reply to your detractor.
Your idea about who is deserving of equal subsidy must be a Party formula secret. You've provided no proof for your definition of fairness and equity of wealth distribution except for your own skewed notion that the worker deserves equal footing with the capitalist because they exist, neglecting the inherrent differences between men and their capacity, capability and initiative. We may be equal under the law, but we are not all equal.
So have another drink on me and wallow in your festival of hate for those that create more than they can consume and enjoy the spoils that come with it. I know if you try hard enough and focus your hate you can eliminate all the hardships of life and the unfairness that creation brings to people who do not own the factories. I'm sure in time we can all be the romanticized robotic subjects of the State and wallow in solidarity as we wait in line for our daily bread and vodka ration.