Rapture is tomorrow...

What Clak? Even the homeless white guy at the bottom of society is racist to dohdough. It leads to the question, what could homeless white guy possibly do to not be racist? I guess stay at the bottom rung of society, so that he ensures he is not taking advantage of the racist society?

I mean come on. Tearing down other people is not the way you fix things. You work together to build everyone up.

That is dohdoughs ideology though, all white people are racist because even when people do attempt to help minorities, they are still racist because they are white. It really makes no sense. I guess white males are all sexist, racist, and intolerant, because they are not crusading for equality with no regard for their own lives. In this regard I guess blacks are racist, because they are not working to fix the system to be equal for american indians. Edit: Oh wait that violates the "only white people have the power to change things" rule. I would love to hear what civil rights leaders would say when you attempt to tell me "that minorities don't have the power to change things for themselves, let alone other minorities"

Just because a woman has the potential to not get a job because of some sexist prick, does not mean I am sexist because I have a job.

Again pure ridiculousness.
 
[quote name='perdition(troy']Let me answer your question. No one has any idea how easy it is or how difficult it is to be black if they are white, how easy or how difficult it is to be white if they are black, or how difficult it is to be female if you are male, or how difficult it is to be male if you are female. You can't choose the pussy you come out of, but you can make the most out of your life is you desire to do so.[/QUOTE]
You didn't answer my question and there are actual quantifiable barriers based on class, race, and socio-economic status. Saying that you can can be President if you work hard enough is bullshit. But you already knew that.
 
[quote name='dohdough']You didn't answer my question and there are actual quantifiable barriers based on class, race, and socio-economic status. Saying that you can can be President if you work hard enough is bullshit. But you already knew that.[/QUOTE]

Why is there white poverty if whites simply have to work hard to succeed? Is all white poverty their own fault? Oh wait, NOW we add in classism. That is right. Noone affects your own life more than somebody else. AmIRight?
 
I'm not going to try and explain anything because it would be futile. I understand what he means. Doh can keep trying if he wants. I'll let the captain say it for me.
What we've got here is... failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
 
[quote name='dohdough']No. We've gone through this several times already.[/quote]

You say that racism requires power - and in this situation, the black guy, who's conscious and has a weapon, has all the power, where the unarmed, unconscious white guy has absolutely none.

Your perception is wrong. You interpreted the article completely wrong. And you even agree that racism without power is meaningless.

I don't know if I'd say it's meaningless. It's not meaningful. There's got to be a middle ground in there where someone.

Exceptions do not make the rule. Pulling out the "you're the racist because you think all thugs are black" is a bullshit argument. There are millions of black muslims in this country, but that doesn't stop the perception of a muslim being that of a Middle Easterner.

So... the fact that hillbilly can be applied to anyone of any color doesn't matter because it's typically only applied to white people.

Yeah, I totally see the inroads you're making to end racism prejudice.
 
[quote name='Clak']I'm not going to try and explain anything because it would be futile. I understand what he means. Doh can keep trying if he wants. I'll let the captain say it for me.[/QUOTE]

By his definition of racism we are all wrong. However his definition of racism is critically flawed.
 
[quote name='Knoell']Why is there white poverty if whites simply have to work hard to succeed? Is all white poverty their own fault? Oh wait, NOW we add in classism. That is right. Noone affects your own life more than somebody else. AmIRight?[/QUOTE]
So you want to jump from institutional racism to white privilege? You might as well try to teach someone multiplication without knowing how to add. I'm going to address you ludicrous non-points though.

Racism does not mean that there won't be any poor white people. Racism and white privilege don't work that way. It means that a poor white person will be better off than a poor black person through access to social services, infrastructure, treatment, wages, hiring preferences, etc.

And when was the last time you went to a propective employer and told them at an initial interview that they are required to hire you. You're a real dumb fuck.

[quote name='UncleBob']You say that racism requires power - and in this situation, the black guy, who's conscious and has a weapon, has all the power, where the unarmed, unconscious white guy has absolutely none. [/quote]
Funny how I keep saying power on an institutional level, yet you keep wanting to insist that power operates on an individual level. It doesn't. It operates on a macro level. Anyone can be an asshole, but with racism, you get different reactions to it. This is played out especially in the area of our judicial system.

I don't know if I'd say it's meaningless. It's not meaningful. There's got to be a middle ground in there where someone.
Fine, so if it's not meaningful, that means that it's not effective in a meaningful way. KINDA LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

So... the fact that hillbilly can be applied to anyone of any color doesn't matter because it's typically only applied to white people.
Don't play dumb with me. How often is the term "gangbanger" with a white person.

Yeah, I totally see the inroads you're making to end racism prejudice.
If black "racism" is not meaningful, then by definition, it's not as important as actual white racism, which is quite meaningful. When black people subjugate white people, I'll be with the white people. Until that happens, white people should STFU unless they want to help with equality. Kinda like how you're actively trying to keep things the way they are.

[quote name='Knoell']By his definition of racism we are all wrong. However his definition of racism is critically flawed.[/QUOTE]
According to all of your statements, you are completely wrong, bob is half-wrong and is exhibiting a defense mechanism, and troy is just as batshit as you are.

What I'd like to see is you pointing out where my definition is critically flawed. Let's see if it'll make any sense. I doubt it though, but I'm an optimist.
 
[quote name='Clak']I'm not going to try and explain anything because it would be futile. I understand what he means. Doh can keep trying if he wants. I'll let the captain say it for me.[/QUOTE]
These are minor league questions and arguments. I also wouldn't be a good anti-racist if I didn't call people out on their bullshit. But I mostly do it for the LULZ and I know others get a kick out of it as well.:cool:
 
[quote name='dohdough']So you want to jump from institutional racism to white privilege? You might as well try to teach someone multiplication without knowing how to add. I'm going to address you ludicrous non-points though.

Racism does not mean that there won't be any poor white people. Racism and white privilege don't work that way. It means that a poor white person will be better off than a poor black person through access to social services, infrastructure, treatment, wages, hiring preferences, etc.

If black "racism" is not meaningful, then by definition, it's not as important as actual white racism, which is quite meaningful. When black people subjugate white people, I'll be with the white people. Until that happens, white people should STFU unless they want to help with equality. Kinda like how you're actively trying to keep things the way they are.


According to all of your statements, you are completely wrong, bob is half-wrong and is exhibiting a defense mechanism, and troy is just as batshit as you are.

What I'd like to see is you pointing out where my definition is critically flawed. Let's see if it'll make any sense. I doubt it though, but I'm an optimist.[/QUOTE]

First off, you are getting out of context. You are claiming racism as what is holding blacks down. I then said if this is true what is holding whites down? And suddenly classism is the factor that is affecting white people so badly. Could this not mean that classism is holding black people down in conjuction with racism rather than individually? There are a multitude of contributing factors to a persons situation. To say racism is to blame for all poor black peoples problems is ridiculous.

So getting back to the original argument, you are saying because white people subjugated black people it isn't racism if a black person says all white people should die? Got it. It is just getting even. AmIRight?

Great news everyone, if a black man kills a white man that he hates, it was only because the white man was holding him down. It does not matter if the white person directly did anything to hold him down. By being white he is just as guilty as someone who was actively holding him down. Fair is fair, AmIRight?

Your definition is critically flawed because you believe all white people are racist, and all black people are victims. You believe racism is a one way street. It isn't, black people can discriminate and hate white people too.

It is still racial discrimination if a black man decides not to hire a white person because he is white. IT IS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.

If you want to water down the definition of racism down, and claim that by default all white people are racist because they are white, go right ahead. Do not expect other people to accept that though.

And if someone doesn't hire me, I do not speculate the hateful reasons they probably didn't hire me for. I call them jackasses and grab the newspaper. How many people are up for one job these days? 20? 30? 40? 50? Racism is not the reason black people do not get hired, it is statistics. You take 19 white marbles and put them in a bag, and one black one. Then you pick one marble out of the bag, What are the chances that you picked the black marble? Is the person picking out of the bag racist? Does the person hiring hate whites because he didn't hire the other 18 white people?

This isn't an argument of whether racial discrimination occurs. It most certainly does, but it is an argument on whether it occurs 100% of the time as you suggest. It does not.
 
Speaking of statistics and outliers, I'm curious about two stats (and not in the mood to go fishing through Google or such)...

What percentage of Americans are white vs. the percentage that's minority?
What percentage of American millionaires are white vs. the percentage that's minority?
 
[quote name='Knoell']First off, you are getting out of context. You are claiming racism as what is holding blacks down. I then said if this is true what is holding whites down? And suddenly classism is the factor that is affecting white people so badly. Could this not mean that classism is holding black people down in conjuction with racism rather than individually? There are a multitude of contributing factors to a persons situation. To say racism is to blame for all poor black peoples problems is ridiculous. [/quote]
It is. Good thing I never said anything like that. Feel free to move the goal posts some more though. Its funny when you squirm.

If you can't understand how a concept like racism working on its own, how do you expect to understand intersectionality. You can't understand classism without racism and vice versa. This is painfully obvious because you take rare events and act as if they're common place that prove you right, when in reality, you're off your freaking rocker.

So getting back to the original argument, you are saying because white people subjugated black people it isn't racism if a black person says all white people should die?
Yes, I thought that was pretty obvious by now.

Got it. It is just getting even. AmIRight?
No. Even would mean 400 years of slavery, illiteracy, broken families, rape, executions, and all that nice stuff black people enjoy/-ed all that time. If white people acted right to begin with, we wouldn't have this issue, but you know how white people are.:roll:

Great news everyone, if a black man kills a white man that he hates, it was only because the white man was holding him down. It does not matter if the white person directly did anything to hold him down. By being white he is just as guilty as someone who was actively holding him down. Fair is fair, AmIRight?
Does the white guy suddenly stop being white when he's homeless? Does the black guy? Does the black guy hate white people for no reason? I've said it before, you don't have to consciously hate someone, as a white person, to perpetuate racist attitudes and actions. But hey, feel free to blame the victim of racism, the black guy, for lashing out his percieved oppressor. With your logic, the slaves were racist for hating their masters.

Your definition is critically flawed because you believe all white people are racist,
I've met a couple that aren't.

and all black people are victims.
Well, they are.

You believe racism is a one way street.
Yup. I've said that several times already.

It isn't, black people can discriminate and hate white people too.
You already know how people educated on racism define it and yes, black people can discriminate and hate against white people, but its not because they have the power to systemaically disenfranchise virtually the entire race. Not even close. It's because they're VICTIMS OF RACISM. Is a rape victim sexist if they hate men?

It is still racial discrimination if a black man decides not to hire a white person because he is white. IT IS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.
Sure, but its still not racist. When it's easier for a black man with a criminal record than a white man with no record with similar education and experience to get a job, then we can revisit this. Regardless, you've got a bit of a persecution complex going on.

If you want to water down the definition of racism down, and claim that by default all white people are racist because they are white, go right ahead. Do not expect other people to accept that though.
Me having a more nuanced view of racism is watering it down because a dictionary is far more important than 150+ years of research? I must've wasted all those years in school because I could've learned everything there is to know about something from a dictionary.

And if someone doesn't hire me, I do not speculate the hateful reasons they probably didn't hire me for. I call them jackasses and grab the newspaper. How many people are up for one job these days? 20? 30? 40? 50? Racism is not the reason black people do not get hired, it is statistics. You take 19 white marbles and put them in a bag, and one black one. Then you pick one marble out of the bag, What are the chances that you picked the black marble? Is the person picking out of the bag racist? Does the person hiring hate whites because he didn't hire the other 18 white people?
Hey, you were the person that said that an individual has more control over their lives compared to the society they live in, not me.

And your analogy is shit because that's not how racism works. If that were true, then the prison system wouldn't be 50% black.

I'm going to jump ahead and go to the next step: You could say that black people tend to be poor, but there are more poor white people than black people. You might think you got me on this one, but you don't. This is where white privilege comes into play which states that a white person will have better outcomes than non-white people. But this is a concept that you refuse to acknowledge.

This isn't an argument of whether racial discrimination occurs. It most certainly does,
And I never said it doesn't.

but it is an argument on whether it occurs 100% of the time as you suggest. It does not.
And I never said it did, but you're the one that focuses on scenarios that happen less than 1% of the time. That's pretty much statistically insignifigant.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Speaking of statistics and outliers, I'm curious about two stats (and not in the mood to go fishing through Google or such)...

What percentage of Americans are white vs. the percentage that's minority?
What percentage of American millionaires are white vs. the percentage that's minority?[/QUOTE]
Well if you're too fucking lazy to google the latest census or wiki it, then I don't know why you even bothered to post at all. I know the racial breakdown of the US by percentage, but I'm not going to tell you. How about you tell me what you think it is since you're too lazy to look it up. I don't know the second part, but I can guarantee that it doesn't jive with the population.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Speaking of statistics and outliers, I'm curious about two stats (and not in the mood to go fishing through Google or such)...

What percentage of Americans are white vs. the percentage that's minority?
What percentage of American millionaires are white vs. the percentage that's minority?[/QUOTE]
:rofl:
 
[quote name='dohdough']Well if you're too fucking lazy to google the latest census or wiki it, then I don't know why you even bothered to post at all. I know the racial breakdown of the US by percentage, but I'm not going to tell you. How about you tell me what you think it is since you're too lazy to look it up. I don't know the second part, but I can guarantee that it doesn't jive with the population.[/QUOTE]

I don't know if I'd call it lazy. I was up late Friday night, finishing up Wind Waker again. Had to work a 9 hour shift early Saturday morning. Came home and mowed the lawn, then, took the wife out to dinner after she got off work. Got home late and had to get up early again this morning - so, sure, at the point I posted that last night, I wasn't in the mood to spend the time looking it all up.

I figured, incorrectly, I guess, that someone here might already have this information and be able to share it. I know, it's crazy - that someone would think people would use the internet to share information and all.
 
[quote name='dohdough']Well if you're too fucking lazy to google the latest census or wiki it, then I don't know why you even bothered to post at all. I know the racial breakdown of the US by percentage, but I'm not going to tell you. How about you tell me what you think it is since you're too lazy to look it up. I don't know the second part, but I can guarantee that it doesn't jive with the population.[/QUOTE]

Doesn't jive? I feel we've went back in time.
128783316863352331.jpg
 
[quote name='Knoell']By his definition of racism we are all wrong. However his definition of racism is critically flawed.[/QUOTE]
All I said was that I understand what he means. You don't (or won't, whatever) and say it's flawed. I'm not going to wade into it, because I know better. I've all but given up on trying to change anyone's mind about anything, once we reach adulthood that's just too hard to do, at least without resorting to sleazy tactics and outright lies.
 
I didn't have the info, but I could find it easily, so anyway:

2010 Pop:
72.4% white, 12.6% black, 0.6% native, 4.8% Asian, 6.2% other, 2.9% multiple

Of those, 16.3% are Hispanic/Latino (mostly white)

The millionaires thing is quite a bit harder to figure out, they usually do the $100,000 cutoff for households or top 10% for individuals (which is less than $100,000) and this is all only annual income, so it wouldn't really get at the question. It also isn't necessarily broken down the same way. Millionaires would be in the top 0.3% or something.

I'm too lazy to go further than that, so in the top 10% - 86.7% white (non-Hispanic I think), 6.8% Asian, 5.2% Hispanic, 5.1% black.

And that would be wikipedia's info from 2006. I doubt the very very top is skewed in favor of non-whites more than that, probably less.

So if you can find just millionaires then that would be nice. What's the point anyway?
 
[quote name='Clak']All I said was that I understand what he means. You don't (or won't, whatever) and say it's flawed. I'm not going to wade into it, because I know better. I've all but given up on trying to change anyone's mind about anything, once we reach adulthood that's just too hard to do, at least without resorting to sleazy tactics and outright lies.[/QUOTE]

I understand what he means. He is wrong though. Read his last response and tell me how it is sane.

This pretty much sums it up:

[quote name='dohdough']
Does the white guy suddenly stop being white when he's homeless? Does the black guy? Does the black guy hate white people for no reason? I've said it before, you don't have to consciously hate someone, as a white person, to perpetuate racist attitudes and actions. But hey, feel free to blame the victim of racism, the black guy, for lashing out his percieved oppressor. With your logic, the slaves were racist for hating their masters.

[/QUOTE]

We shouild not blame a black man for killing an innocent white man who has not done anything to the black man. Oh wait he has done something, he is white. How does he have any credibility in your eyes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just because you don't understand what someone means, and you don't btw, doesn't mean they're wrong. That's all I'm going to say because I'm not getting pulled into this.
 
[quote name='Clak']Just because you don't understand what someone means, and you don't btw, doesn't mean they're wrong. That's all I'm going to say because I'm not getting pulled into this.[/QUOTE]

You don't have to respond, I just hope you realize the root of all this came out of someone saying all christians should die/go away. The fact that I have to argue about how that is a bigoted, wrong, and terrible thing to say, says something about dohdoughs ideology.
 
[quote name='SpazX']What's the point anyway?[/QUOTE]

I was curious as to what the ratio is. We're told we should ignore outliers and the exceptions to the rule - and it's been my experience that *anyone* being a millionaire is an outlier.

"Rich old white guy" is chanted around here like Beetlejuice, yet if we're supposed to ignore the exceptions, there are no rich white guys to worry about.

[quote name='IRHari']I hope a mod closes this dogshit thread.[/QUOTE]

There's an "X" in your upper, right hand corner. Click that, and it'll be just like a mod closed the thread. :D
 
[quote name='UncleBob'] There's an "X" in your upper, right hand corner. Click that, and it'll be just like a mod closed the thread.
icon_biggrin.gif
[/QUOTE]

As usual, you're wrong. Take a guess as to why.
 
[quote name='IRHari']As usual, you're wrong. Take a guess as to why.[/QUOTE]

Because you can't manage to stay out of a topic you have no interest in?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Because you can't manage to stay out of a topic you have no interest in?[/QUOTE]

I believe him and DoughDumb are cut from the same cloth.
 
[quote name='UncleBob'] Because you can't manage to stay out of a topic you have no interest in?[/QUOTE]

I'm using a Mac, dumbass. I see no 'X' button in the upper right corner.

I was interested when we were making fun of the crazy apocalypse predicting dude. Like, what this original thread was about. Now that we're way off topic talking about white people and black people, yeah, this thread needs a shutdown. Idiocy on both sides.
 
"The property of this country is absolutely concentered in a very few hands, having revenues of from half a million of guineas a year downwards. These employ the flower of the country as servants, some of them having as many as 200 domestics, not labouring. They employ also a great number of manufacturers, and tradesmen, and lastly the class of labouring husbandmen. But after all these comes the most numerous of all the classes, that is, the poor who cannot find work. I asked myself what could be the reason that so many should be permitted to beg who are willing to work, in a country where there is a very considerable proportion of uncultivated lands? These lands are kept idle mostly for the aske of game. It should seem then that it must be because of the enormous wealth of the proprietors which places them above attention to the increase of their revenues by permitting these lands to be laboured. I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable. But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. The descent of property of every kind therefore to all the children, or to all the brothers and sisters, or other relations in equal degree is a politic measure, and a practicable one. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right. The earth is given as a common stock for man to labour and live on. If, for the encouragement of industry we allow it to be appropriated, we must take care that other employment be furnished to those excluded from the appropriation. If we do not the fundamental right to labour the earth returns to the unemployed. It is too soon yet in our country to say that every man who cannot find employment but who can find uncultivated land, shall be at liberty to cultivate it, paying a moderate rent. But it is not too soon to provide by every possible means that as few as possible shall be without a little portion of land. The small landholders are the most precious part of a state."

Guess who said it.

http://factsandotherstubbornthings.blogspot.com/2011/06/yglesias-on-classical-liberals.html
 
[quote name='Msut77']Guess who said it.

http://factsandotherstubbornthings.blogspot.com/2011/06/yglesias-on-classical-liberals.html
[/QUOTE]

FYI that site keeps trying to get my computer to download stuff. I suggest not clicking it.
 
[quote name='camoor']FYI that site keeps trying to get my computer to download stuff. I suggest not clicking it.[/QUOTE]
You might already have something malicious on your computer. I get nothing weird on my end.

I shall now go further off topic and turn this into an IT help thread.

No need to thank me my fellow CAG's.

knoell: I see that you have a new sig. How cute. If only you linked the quote instead of c'n'p-ing it like a coward so that someone couldn't track back to the thread an see how out of context it was. But hey, if you choose to be nothing better than a colostomy bag, don't get pissed when people say you're full of shit.
 
[quote name='Msut77']Guess who said it.

http://factsandotherstubbornthings.blogspot.com/2011/06/yglesias-on-classical-liberals.html
[/QUOTE]
There are people in the comments there actually defending the idea that kings rule by divine right.

Yeesh.
 
[quote name='Clak']There are people in the comments there actually defending the idea that kings rule by divine right.

Yeesh.[/QUOTE]

Divine right eh? Man, somebody should just go and kill all the christians...
 
Not sure why it wasn't linked, but there you go. Maybe I will put a "click here to see entire discussion" in there too. I wouldn't want people to miss out on the entire scope of your insanity.

Edit: It seems I am at my 500 character limit. The link will have to do.
 
[quote name='Knoell']Not sure why it wasn't linked, but there you go. Maybe I will put a "click here to see entire discussion" in there too. I wouldn't want people to miss out on the entire scope of your insanity.

Edit: It seems I am at my 500 character limit. The link will have to do.[/QUOTE]
It wasn't linked for the same reason it wasn't linked the first time: You purposely didn't link it cause you know you'd look like an idiot, and rightfully so, if people knew the context.

You say that all discrimination is equal and I say that it isn't if you don't have the power to enact it. You might as well argue that thinking about beating someone with a baseball bat is the same as actually beating someone with a baseball bat. I'm pretty sure that this tips the insanity scale on your side.

PS_0772W_CAN_EXPLAIN_t.jpg
 
[quote name='dohdough']You say that all discrimination is equal and I say that it isn't if you don't have the power to enact it. You might as well argue that thinking about beating someone with a baseball bat is the same as actually beating someone with a baseball bat.[/QUOTE]

No, you've argued that racism doesn't exist if you don't have the power within society to act upon it (even if you have the individual power to act upon it).

You're argument is that a minority beating someone with a baseball bat isn't racism even if that individual is screaming out racial slurs the entire time.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']No, you've argued that racism doesn't exist if you don't have the power within society to act upon it (even if you have the individual power to act upon it).[/QUOTE]
Actually, I've argued both, but you two fucks keep shifting the goddamned goal posts. What you say I'm arguing is a result of what you quoted.

And I'm going to get to that apart about that individuals ability...

You're argument is that a minority beating someone with a baseball bat isn't racism even if that individual is screaming out racial slurs the entire time.
No. You just added that for the first time now and therefore, changing context..ie MOVING THE GODDAMN GOAL POST AGAIN.

I have another wrench to throw into this machine:

Now I had already said that the racist white homeless person has some mental issues and probably substance abuse problems which is exacerbated by homelessness. I got no argument from that. Then you fucks threw in a prejudiced black homeless person into the scenario that beat the racist white homeless person as if the black person had full control of his actions, when he mostlikely shares the same mental and substance abuse issues along with all the baggage that being a black person entails.

Secondly, here's something that still wasn't addressed: Does a racist white homeless person with mental and substance abuse problems suddenly STOP BEING WHITE with all that it entails? Does the same apply if the person is black? If that's too damned complicated for you, think about what it means to be white and what it means to be black in any number of contexts. They are simply not fucking equal and to apply some sort of individualist equivalence fallacy is pretty fucking stupid. Unless you want your kids treated like black people, then maybe you two should shut the fuck up.

edit: Individual choice doesn't mean shit if there isn't a system to back it up.
 
[quote name='dohdough']Actually, I've argued both, but you two fucks keep shifting the goddamned goal posts. What you say I'm arguing is a result of what you quoted.

And I'm going to get to that apart about that individuals ability...


No. You just added that for the first time now and therefore, changing context..ie MOVING THE GODDAMN GOAL POST AGAIN.

I have another wrench to throw into this machine:

Now I had already said that the racist white homeless person has some mental issues and probably substance abuse problems which is exacerbated by homelessness. I got no argument from that. Then you fucks threw in a prejudiced black homeless person into the scenario that beat the racist white homeless person as if the black person had full control of his actions, when he mostlikely shares the same mental and substance abuse issues along with all the baggage that being a black person entails.

Secondly, here's something that still wasn't addressed: Does a racist white homeless person with mental and substance abuse problems suddenly STOP BEING WHITE with all that it entails? Does the same apply if the person is black? If that's too damned complicated for you, think about what it means to be white and what it means to be black in any number of contexts. They are simply not fucking equal and to apply some sort of individualist equivalence fallacy is pretty fucking stupid. Unless you want your kids treated like black people, then maybe you two should shut the fuck up.

edit: Individual choice doesn't mean shit if there isn't a system to back it up.[/QUOTE]

For those just tuning in, it is apparent that DohDough is just a racist who uses the politics and controversy threads to spew his opinions and thoughts.
 
[quote name='dohdough'][quote name='UncleBob']You're argument is that a minority beating someone with a baseball bat isn't racism even if that individual is screaming out racial slurs the entire time.[/QUOTE]
No. You just added that for the first time now and therefore, changing context..ie MOVING THE GODDAMN GOAL POST AGAIN.[/QUOTE]

Four days earlier...

[quote name='dohdough'][quote name='UncleBob']Okay, so homeless black guy is angry, drunk and has a knife. Walks up to another homeless guy - also drunk, passed out and white. Black guy stabs white guy to death, screaming "Kill Whitey". In this situation, the black guy had all the power he needed, while the white guy had zero power.

Racism in your view?[/quote]
No. We've gone through this several times already.[/QUOTE]


FIRST TIME EVER.... four days ago...
 
[quote name='Jabrim']For those just tuning in, it is apparent that DohDough is just a racist who uses the politics and controversy threads to spew his opinions and thoughts.[/QUOTE]
I think you've confused me for yourself. I'm not the one actively participating in the racist farce of an institution called our justice system that punishes black people and Latinos harsher and longer acting as an overseer. I'm not a sociopath that thinks they're all "scum" and think they deserve all the punishment they get. You are.
 
[quote name='dohdough']I think you've confused me for yourself. I'm not the one actively participating in the racist farce of an institution called our justice system that punishes black people and Latinos harsher and longer acting as an overseer. I'm not a sociopath that thinks they're all "scum" and think they deserve all the punishment they get. You are.
[/QUOTE]

Preach on Malcolm, you ignorant excuse for a man.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Four days earlier...

FIRST TIME EVER.... four days ago...[/QUOTE]

"Whitey" is a racist slur? Uhhh...no. Oh...and thanks for reminding me about the angry and drunk part. So in other words, he was mentally impaired and you don't give a reason for his lashing out at a seemingly "random" white person. Just because one drunk and angry black person kills a racist homeless white person doesn't mean that black people as a group have more institutional power than white people as a group. Just because your manager may be black doesn't mean that he's higher on the racial heirachy of this country than you. Just because Oprah is a billionaire doesn't mean that any black woman raised in an abusive home can do what she did. If you TRULY think that black people and whites have the same challenges in life, you don't live in the real world.

You bringing it up four days ago doesn't mean shit if the purpose of moving the goal posts is all the same. It doesn't make my entire argument invalid. Not that you've addressed anything beyond discrimination is equal no matter who it's coming from. I guess rape victims are sexist if they hate men.:roll:
 
[quote name='Jabrim']Preach on Malcolm, you ignorant excuse for a man.[/QUOTE]
How about you rub your two brain cells together and tell me what's ignorant about you calling them scum and implying that they deserve all the punishment they get because you "work with" them on a daily basis?

Or how about you tell me how I'm ignorant?

I'd prefer you do the later, but you'll probably just throw another "librul convict lover" my way and call it a day because you can't put 3 sentences together to explain your views. Don't blame me cause your arguments are weaksauce.
 
[quote name='dohdough']"Whitey" is a racist slur? Uhhh...no.[/quote]

In the phrase "Kill Whitey", yes. If someone was chanting "Kill Blackie", would you consider that racist?

Oh, I get it, racial slurs can't exist if they're about white people because you can't be racist against white people.

Just because one drunk and angry black person kills a racist homeless white person doesn't mean that black people as a group have more institutional power than white people as a group.

Interesting. The only thing I said about the second homeless guy is that he was drunk, passed out and white. And you automatically assume that he's racist. I guess because he's white?

If you TRULY think that black people and whites have the same challenges in life, you don't live in the real world.

I don't - and never said I did.

Just like I don't believe two white people or two black people have the same challenges in life in this country. We're a myriad of different peoples, all with different challenges that we face. What defines us is how we answer those challenges .

Not that you've addressed anything beyond discrimination is equal no matter who it's coming from.

I don't believe that.
I've said I don't believe that.
You've acknowledged that I said I don't believe that.

Can you at least try to have an honest discussion?

I guess rape victims are sexist if they hate men.:roll:

Umm... Question - Let's say I was beat up - often - by a group of black kids in school. Would it then be okay for me to project my hate/fear of these few black kids on all black people?
 
[quote name='dohdough']How about you rub your two brain cells together and tell me what's ignorant about you calling them scum and implying that they deserve all the punishment they get because you "work with" them on a daily basis?

Or how about you tell me how I'm ignorant?

I'd prefer you do the later, but you'll probably just throw another "librul convict lover" my way and call it a day because you can't put 3 sentences together to explain your views. Don't blame me cause your arguments are weaksauce.[/QUOTE]

Your distorted views on life are what makes you ignorant, that and your obvious hatred for anyone other than that of a black man, who in your opinion has such a horrible life. It apparently, is everyone's fault that black people are born black and should be given an easier life thus because they are black. You are like most of the "cattle" of the world who constantly talk but, never do anything. You can spew your thoughts on a keyboard and speak as though you care about your race which is obviously black, I say "your" race because as I said earlier you are an extremely deluted man who has racist issues that goes beyond anything on this forum can deal with.

I don't have to argue with you, to me this isn't arguing, this is me wasting time while I download a game on X-Box live. This is the first time I have ever heard anyone tell anyone their arguement is "weaksauce". Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you?
 
This is so hilarious on so many levels.

[quote name='Jabrim']Your distorted views on life are what makes you ignorant,[/quote]
What about my views is distorted? I've made many points that are able to be debated, but you haven't addressed a single goddamned one.

that and your obvious hatred for anyone other than that of a black man, who in your opinion has such a horrible life.
This is incorrect. I've stated that being a person of color automatically makes life more difficult to comparable whites in the same economic class.

It apparently, is everyone's fault that black people are born black
Being born a certain race should not have a large effect on peoples lives. Too bad it does.

and should be given an easier life thus because they are black.
Well obviously YES. They should have it as easy as white folk after bridging the systematic oppression that was forced on them. And not just black people, but all people of color.

You are like most of the "cattle" of the world who constantly talk but, never do anything.
I used to be a community activist and now I'm back in school to learn how to help more people rather than being an overseer like you. I'm fighting the system to be more just and you're enabling it. I don't think you really understand the words you are typing.

You can spew your thoughts on a keyboard and speak as though you care about your race which is obviously black, I say "your" race because as I said earlier you are an extremely deluted man who has racist issues that goes beyond anything on this forum can deal with.
So I am "black" because I don't promote what is "white" because "white" makes "right." And since I don't promote "white," which you do, I'm racist and deluded. Uhhh...yeah...

I don't have to argue with you, to me this isn't arguing, this is me wasting time while I download a game on X-Box live. This is the first time I have ever heard anyone tell anyone their arguement is "weaksauce". Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you?
What's wrong with me? You are. But I don't think that's something you have the capacity to understand.
 
Does it bother you that you deny or won't admit you're own race on here? The internet allows you to be annoymous, so surely here you can admit to your own race? You also say you are a community activist, what community is that exactly? I would love to hear some of your inspiring words first-hand so that I may better understand my ignorant ways as a white privledged man who has done nothing but hurt the other races.
 
[quote name='Jabrim']Does it bother you that you deny or won't admit you're own race on here? The internet allows you to be annoymous, so surely here you can admit to your own race? You also say you are a community activist, what community is that exactly? I would love to hear some of your inspiring words first-hand so that I may better understand my ignorant ways as a white privledged man who has done nothing but hurt the other races.[/QUOTE]
You already labeled me as "black." There's no need to move beyond that since you haven't really done anything to warrant more nuance on that front. But like I said, it says more about you assuming I'm black when I've stated my race on other threads as well as assuming that anyone that supports any kind of justice and equity, for non-whites, as not being white. Which implies the whiteness is normal and anything that isn't white, isn't normal.

For the sake of this argument, I'm comfortable with being identified as "black." So for shits and giggles, I'm not going to say what race I am because what you're doing is backpeddling in the case I might be white. edit: Or go on about some tangent about white guilt or something crazy like being a self-hating white person.
 
You either are black or mixed one another. No one is comfortable in their color, you either are or you are not, I'm not "comfortable" being caucasian, I just am, it's life. I'm not researching prior posts to see what your ethnicity is, I just think it is funny that you make it such a big deal to such a simple fact of life.
 
bread's done
Back
Top