Rove to Voters: Vote Republican, or They'll Investigate Us!

dennis_t

CAGiversary!
This is an interesting strategy, but I can't help but think it's going to backfire. When this many people are unhappy about the direction the country's going in, they might welcome some oversight from, well, the people who have been supposed to provide oversight all along. I think folks are sick of the Rubber-Stamp Republicans covering for Bush's incompetence.

WASHINGTON, May 5 — To anyone who doubts the stakes for the White House in this year's midterm Congressional elections, consider that Representative John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the Democrat who would become chairman of the Judiciary Committee if his party recaptured the House, has called for an inquiry into the possible impeachment of President Bush over the war in Iraq.

Or listen to Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, who would run the Senate Judiciary Committee if the Democrats took the Senate. Mr. Leahy vowed in a recent interview to subpoena top administration officials, if he got the chance, to answer more questions about their secret eavesdropping program and what he considers faulty prewar intelligence.

The prospect of the administration spending its last two years being grilled by angry Democrats under the heat of partisan spotlights has added urgency to the efforts by Karl Rove and Mr. Bush's political team to hang on to the Republican majorities in Congress.

Newly shorn of the daily policymaking duties he took on after the 2004 campaign and now refocused on his role as Mr. Bush's chief strategist, Mr. Rove is facing an increasingly difficult climate for Republicans, and an increasingly assertive Democratic Party.

The ambitious second-term agenda he helped develop has faltered even with a Republican Congress. His once-grand plans for creating a broadened and permanent Republican majority have given way to a goal of clinging to control of the House and Senate.

The prospect of Democrats capturing either, however, may be one of the best weapons Mr. Rove has as he turns to what he has traditionally done best: motivating his party's conservative base to turn out on Election Day.

Heading into the election, many conservatives are disheartened by the war in Iraq, upset at what they see as a White House tolerance for bigger government and escalating federal spending, and divided over issues like immigration. The abrupt resignation on Friday of the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Porter J. Goss, promised to feed the impression of an administration that is off balance.

But White House and Republican officials, trying to turn vulnerability to advantage, say conservatives could be united and re-energized by the possibility that Democrats could put Mr. Bush and his policies on political trial by winning control of even one chamber of Congress.





http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/08/w...=1147147200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
 
The Republicans are quite thoroughly fucked, and they know it. Their hopes of maintaining a majority in the House are pretty much non-existant, and even the Senate is looking dicey. Their only real goal at this point is to at least prevent the Democrats from gaining super-majority status so that they can at least fillibuster any investigations to a stand-still. The 2006 elections are going to be the dirtiest, nastiest, most lie-filled election in American history as the Republicans try to hold on to any scrap of power they can.

This topic, by the way, is the perfect time to throw the excuses the Bush administration uses for its wiretapping back in its face: if you don't have anything to hide, why worry so much about being investigated? Why, the way the Bush administration is freaking out about the very idea of investigations, you might think they were covering some things up.
 
bread's done
Back
Top