Saddam: I alone was responsible

alonzomourning23

CAGiversary!
Feedback
26 (100%)
When I read this I immediately thought of Bush, and how different this is from Bush's "It's everyones fault but mine" attitude. Hell, put bush on trial where his life is at stake and he'd probably claim Jesus did it before admitting responsibility.

Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has told his trial in Baghdad that he alone should be made to answer for the actions of his regime.


At the end of a second straight day of prosecution evidence, he said the court should not be trying anyone else - a reference to his seven co-defendants.
Earlier, he admitted razing the farms of those convicted of trying to kill him in the town of Dujail in 1982.

The trial, which resumed amid fresh violence, was adjourned until 12 March.
Three bombs exploded in Baghdad on Wednesday, killing more than 20 people.

More than 400 people have been killed and scores wounded in the current spate of sectarian violence that began after a bomb attack on a Shia Muslim shrine in the city of Samarra last Wednesday.

Bullets

A businesslike court session was enlivened at the very end by Saddam Hussein's extraordinary intervention, says the BBC's Jim Muir from the court. Having listened to the documents and testimonies - many of which implicated his fellow defendants in the killings of 148 Shia Muslims from Dujail - he told the court it should be trying him alone.


But he insisted that he had done nothing wrong, as those who were executed had been found guilty of trying to assassinate him.

"If it was a crime to refer for trial those accused of shooting at the president, then try me and save a lot of trouble," he told the court.

"I am Saddam Hussein. I was in charge, and just because things have changed, I am not going to say someone else was responsible."

The 63-year-old former president said he had ordered the destruction of orchards belonging to villagers convicted over the failed attempt on his life in Dujail.

"I razed them... we specified the farmland of those who were convicted and I signed," Saddam Hussein told the court.

He described seeing bullets pass before his eyes during the attack on his convoy during a visit to Dujail, and said God had saved him.

Further indictments?
Earlier, chief prosecutor Jaafar al-Moussawi had presented documents and letters that he said linked the former president to the Dujail massacre.


The court saw death certificates of nearly 100 villagers, who were hanged after being convicted by a revolutionary court.

Documents showed transfer orders revealing how their families, including babies just a few months old, were shipped off into the desert after their homes and farms were seized.

One letter revealed that four of the accused were executed by mistake, while two were released by mistake.

Another, purportedly from the Iraqi secret service, said nearly 50 of the accused had died during interrogation rather than by hanging.

The judge has adjourned the trial for 11 days, during which time the court will decide whether to indict former Interior Minister Saadoun Shaker, as requested by the prosecution.

The trial, which began in October, has so far heard 26 prosecution witnesses.
The defendants deny the charges.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4763228.stm
 
ohno6nr.gif
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']I'm glad that you understand the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship.[/quote]

Cool.

Now go look up the way Bush and his lackey Yoo interpret the phrase about Congress having the exclusive power to declare war and tell me which system resembles the modern US government more accurately.
 
AM23, let me get this straight. You are praising Saddam for taking responsiblity for the things he was responsible for, including genosyde, gassing Kurds, rape, murder, etc.. Once again, I don't even like Bush but you guys are such fucking idiots about it. No, trying to make Saddam look better than Bush does not work. It only makes you look like a jackass. For the record though, Saddam is not admitting guilt he is just being defiant. Big difference.

Wait, were you one of those guys with signs praising Saddam before the war?
 
[quote name='KrAzY3']Wait, were you one of those guys with signs praising Saddam before the war?[/QUOTE]

I would love to see those actually.
 
[quote name='camoor']Cool.

Now go look up the way Bush and his lackey Yoo interpret the phrase about Congress having the exclusive power to declare war and tell me which system resembles the modern US government more accurately.[/QUOTE]

You should probably go have McKinley, T Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, Reagan, and Bush Sr. to interpret that too. We are asking president's questions, right?
 
[quote name='KrAzY3']AM23, let me get this straight. [/quote]

This could be a first. Will you do it? Let's see.......

You are praising Saddam for taking responsiblity for the things he was responsible for, including genosyde, gassing Kurds, rape, murder, etc.. Once again, I don't even like Bush but you guys are such fucking idiots about it. No, trying to make Saddam look better than Bush does not work. It only makes you look like a jackass. For the record though, Saddam is not admitting guilt he is just being defiant. Big difference.

Wait, were you one of those guys with signs praising Saddam before the war?

.......nope.

It's not making saddam look good, it's that a dictator like saddam can take responsibility when he's fighting for his life, yet bush can't seem to do it with the most trivial things (one semi-exception).

Though saddam did admit to the acts. There's a difference between admitting to something and admitting to a crime. It's like someone who murders in self defense, you can say you killed them but that in doing so no crime was committed. That was his argument.
 
[quote name='munch']You should probably go have McKinley, T Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, Reagan, and Bush Sr. to interpret that too. We are asking president's questions, right?[/quote]

It takes time to erode those pesky constitutional checks and balances.

If you put a frog in boiling water, he hops out.

If you put him in lukewarm water and keep slowly raising the temperature, he'll eventually boil to death.
 
[quote name='camoor']Cool.

Now go look up the way Bush and his lackey Yoo interpret the phrase about Congress having the exclusive power to declare war and tell me which system resembles the modern US government more accurately.[/quote]

Who funded the war again? I'm pretty sure Bush STILL asks for funds to keep our troops over there.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']Who funded the war again? I'm pretty sure Bush STILL asks for funds to keep our troops over there.[/quote]

So Bush can unilaterally send troops anywhere he wants, they can just be stranded without support at a later date if Congress disagrees.

Brilliant, I'm sure political power struggles that put the troops in grave danger are exactly the types of checks and balances our forefathers envisioned.
 
[quote name='camoor']It takes time to erode those pesky constitutional checks and balances.

If you put a frog in boiling water, he hops out.

If you put him in lukewarm water and keep slowly raising the temperature, he'll eventually boil to death.[/QUOTE]

I'm not defending Bush, but I'm also not acting like there weren't precedents already set, like you seem to be doing.
 
bread's done
Back
Top