SEC employees accessed porn while financial system burned

[quote name='RAMSTORIA']your hand evidently[/QUOTE]

Better than most government positions that require raping taxpayers in the bum without lube.
 
It was a stimulus package.

Seriously though the only thing surprising about this was that 40% of the porn surfers were women.

The Bush admin had the SEC on ice for 8 years, some watched porno, I'm sure the rest were using facebook, Itunes, or solitaire to pass the time.

Just watch the media and the 'party of no' focus on this salacious bullshit instead of the Wall Street crooks who take billions in exchange for moving around electronic blips. Let's not live in the past - it's about time we take down the system that sucks 1/3 of America's wealth without adding anything. Split up the big banks, create some real competition, and obliterate "too big to fail"
 
[quote name='cindersphere']Really?[/QUOTE]

Yes. They're getting paid $100,000, no doubt have their own private office, and they're jerking off to porn while they should be policing the stuff that caused the financial meltdown in the first place.

These businesspeople are scum.

I guess I wasn't too far off in the other thread when I said that they only have their own private offices so they can jerk off when they should be working.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Nero diddled while Rome burned.[/QUOTE]

I thought he played the fiddle. I need to check the history books again..
 
[quote name='Strell']How many riddle fiddles could Nero diddle if Nero could diddle riddle fiddles?[/QUOTE]

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Oy, you. Take Chuplayer and high tail it out of the vs forums.[/QUOTE]

Oh get lost. I'm not part of the juvenile joking that's going around in this topic. I'm genuinely upset by these businesspeople squandering their time and pay on anything but doing their job.
 
[quote name='GenPirate']I wonder if she is into butt sex, I would have loved to have been her boss (discipline is key).[/QUOTE]

Does this mean you will be changing your username to AssPirate?
 
[quote name='camoor']It was a stimulus package.

Seriously though the only thing surprising about this was that 40% of the porn surfers were women.

[/QUOTE]

I dunno if it is surprising to me. Women can be every bit the horndogs men can and lets face it, in this day and age exploring sexuality through porn is much safer than one-night stands.

The only thing that surprises me is surfing for porn at work. We all know what porn is for and I don't see how anyone can enjoy looking at it in a place you can't masturbate freely at work 1800 times, unless they have a locked office I guess.
 
Apparently Goldman Sachs' emails were leaked by Carl Levin, and it shows Goldman employees (the ones behind it anyway) reveling in what they were doing.

Now conservatives are up in arms.

Conservative:"You can't indict Goldman based on this! We're all entitled to a trial, this is America!"

Liberal:"Just like the trial that ACORN was entitled to, right?"

Conservative:"....go fuck yourself"
 
Are you defending ACORN or just trying to make a case for hypocrisy?

20 bucks says that bow tie wearing economist in the vid likes him some porn. For hell' sake, he's wearing a bow tie!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not defending ACORN, but defending the idea that everyone gets a trial. ACORN had their funds stripped based off of NO trial, doctored videos, and the actions of a few individuals.

The same exact defense I made above is being made for Goldman. Yeah, it's hypocrisy because these are the same people who condemned ACORN and now are rushing to defend Goldman (or they're at least defending the idea of a trial.)

Bob, would LOVE to hear your views, considering you were one of the biggest ACORN bashers in the respective thread.
 
Bob didn't bash ACORN at all. He just made baseless accusations based on a sketchy video made by a sketchy dude. Nothing wrong with that at all.
 
[quote name='IRHari']Not defending ACORN, but defending the idea that everyone gets a trial. ACORN had their funds stripped based off of NO trial, doctored videos, and the actions of a few individuals.

The same exact defense I made above is being made for Goldman. Yeah, it's hypocrisy because these are the same people who condemned ACORN and now are rushing to defend Goldman (or they're at least defending the idea of a trial.)

Bob, would LOVE to hear your views, considering you were one of the biggest ACORN bashers in the respective thread.[/QUOTE]

I have absolutely no problem with - and would be thrilled if our government would - taking away all federal funds from G/S without any kind of a trial what-so-ever.

Happy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top