So millions and maybe billions of people >

U2K Tha Greate$t

U2K Tha Greate$t

Banned
Depend on the governments and leaders of this world for " Protection ".

Well thats yall first mistake, your second mistake is thinking they will bring peace to this world. Your last mistake, is following the separation between " Chruch and state " laws.

If you think i'm wrong, just watch how this world plays out. Its rough out there yall, can you hang on?

* goes back to throne *
 
^ I doubt it, trust me on that one. I was just saying, people should "nt put thier trust in the world leaders, excuse me, so call world leaders of this land and other lands. They cant protect us, so why depend on them?
 
[quote name='U2K Tha Greate$t']They cant protect us, so why depend on them?[/QUOTE]

Because they are far more real than the gods who's will they claim to follow.
 
You want protection? Buy a bullet proof vest, a helmet and hide in your basement for the rest of your life. No anthopomorphic entity in the sky is going to shield you from harm any more than a politician. Now stop posting stupid threads.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']Because they are far more real than the gods who's will they claim to follow.[/QUOTE]


:applause: Thats what i was waiting for someone to say, thank you.

And for the rest of yall, who dont agree with me, thats alright, i still love you, and i aint mad at cha. I was just sharing my views on the things within this world, you may not agree, and thats cool too.

Peace, and make sure you keep it.
 
I'm still trying to decide if what I feel towards your statement is disagreement.

For instance, if a friend were to tell me that the very finest Crass album is "Yes, Sir, I Will" then I would disagree with him, and say "No, it is 'Penis Envy.'"

If the same friend were to tell me that the very best cheap beer is Pabst Blue Ribbon, I would disagree with him, and say, "No, it is Miller High Life."

On the other hand, if his infant child were to soil his diapers, bonk his head on the coffee table, and utter something along the lines of "weebiewoopsibluh" to me, then I would find that to be something I could not disagree with.

In short, in order for me to disagree with something, I would require, first and foremost, a point of contention ("Yes, Sit, I Will," and Pabst Blue Ribbon) that is both a declarative sentence and intellectually coherent. I'm afraid, then, that based on those two criteria (sentence and coherence), anything you've said thus far is null and void due to a complete and utter lack of coherence.

You're far more like the infant than the poor sap who likes Pabst, in sum.

So, I suppose that, for technical reasons, I can not disagree with you (nor can I agree, however).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top