[quote name='MarioColbert']You know, I think the best ways to display your intelligence and pomposity is on an Internet forum. In fact, I am about to do just that. And I'm going to use mykevermin as an example, because he belongs to this rare minority of CAG forum users that seem to really like flame wars. I'd use Metal Boss, but he's a MACHINE, and that makes him a liberal. Furthermore, his talks about Bush losing the people's vote sets him just where he needs to be: next to Hillary Clinton and Jack Thompson, singing Kum-Ba-Ya My Lord.
Now, on the surface, this appears to be an angry adolescent statement of a person who "can form a coherent string of sentences that follow each other in a logical fashion", correct?
Here comes the clue train, last stop is YOU, mykevermin. The previous statment is:
What does that refer to?
So, let's put it back together:
1. First sentence: You're the pretentious academe who didn't feel the need to condescent who Pavlov was, and that is what makes you an asshole.
2. You are happy to be that asshole
3. You can make sentences follow each other in a logical fashion.
I ask you, mykevermin: what is the relation of sentence number 3 to sentence number 2 and number 1? The use of the word "asshole" is not enough. Your third sentence is about your proficiency with "coherent sentence-based writing" while the previous two deal with your lack of response to Pavlov and being an asshole...
Listen, oh dear child of English proficiency and fair believer in a supremacy clause... If you want to connect the sentences LOGICALLY, try defining a "theme." You're much better with that when it comes to accusing Strell of being a fanboy:
I'm glad your sentences are complete, just as are your logical fallacies. If your words were a piece of code, the Internet would die.[/QUOTE]
It's in reference to absolutely nothing if you want to ignore Strell's posts, the one I quoted in the post you quoted, as well as others in this thread. If you want to take apart my posts as if it existed in some vacuum devoid of context, well, then you're certainly going to find questions about it that don't make sense (because, simply, you're willfully ignoring those circumstances that led me to that post). You want to act as if my post was some spontaneous occurrance, rather than a reaction to something else.
You seem to fancy singling me out, as you've done it on several occasions. I don't mind, but I do find your gimmick awfully boring, and truthfully neither funny nor enlightening. I suspect you'll be gone in short order, either due to a lack of reaction from others on this site, from your preference to stop role-playing, or from some other circumstance. When I said, earlier, that you were no Narrator's Apprentice, I meant it.
Consider this a lesson on how to make yourself a worthwhile and wellknown character in under 30 posts. I challenge you to do the same in 100.