[quote name='TimPV3']Nobody factors in the percentages of the $10 more they're paying now than in last generation. You're irrelevant bitching is forgetting the SNES and N64 era, where everything was $65. Consumers are stupid, and they will buy.
And with the new retail set at $29.99, why would used game prices dip down to $17? They'll stop right at the $27 mark, but since you like to bitch about percentages, I guess you can sit at home and cry that it's a 10% decrease of the new price, as opposed to a 15%, even though it's the same
ing $3 off.[/quote]
Wow. I don't even know where to start. Yes, I do:
I
am irrelevant bitching. Thank you. I needed a new tagline.
I provided an analysis as to why $30 is much worse overall, using several reasons in addition to percentages. That you chose to dismiss
all of it as "bitching" reflects more on you than me.
Knock yourself out buying $30 games, rationalizing that because it's better than
the N64 era that it's somehow relevant now, for something completely different. Just to show how awful an analogy that is in one small way, I'll note that the N64 era occurred
after a major recession. After. Not during. Since you like that era so much, you do the math.
Oh wait. You did. And it sucked. Never mind.
Used prices dip far lower than $30 because of stores like Gamefly and GS, with their regular 25% off coupons, 35% with Edge.
Like this week's. When it is possible to get a comparatively vast number of games at the sub $20 price point, including all the GH games (35% off 26.99 would be $17.54), why is anyone going to be excited at $30?
That was the point. The $30 price point fails in
several ways at the primary reason for having GH: to spur sales. If a $30 price point induces people to buy used copies instead, it fails even harder. Sony may be in the hole, but they're not going to get any better if they don't move games.
But you go ahead. Support Sony by buying $30 GH games. Someone has to.