Another instance of Nintendo "doing Nintendo." As one who grew up an NES kid, still likes Mario and Zelda, and has picked up every Nintendo console through the Wii U, I haven't jumped aboard the Switch train (yet).
I'm not much into handheld, so the pick-up feature of the Switch doesn't do anything for me. If/when I pick up a Switch, it'll stay docked 99% of the time. The fact that the Switch has been a Wii U-port fest hasn't done much for me, either. Yes, I realize it has other good-great Nintendo games, but the one I'm most interested in (Bayonetta 3) seems like it's at least another year away. And no, I didn't fall for Breath of the Wild like others did.
In other words, I'm in no hurry, and Nintendo's announcement makes this an easy pass for me.
I'll stick with my PS4 for another year (or more). In earnest, I'm probably still more likely to pick up a PS5 first (no rush there, either; will wait until those become readily available).
I was curious about the rumored "pro" version. I wondered if Nintendo would use it to correct hardware issues and improve performance. But as it did with the Switch Lite, it looks like NIntendo has (again) opted to do as little as possible. I get the whole "don't fix what isn't broken" mentality. I suppose Nintendo's approach is, "Why bother making hardware advancements when you're selling well anyways." Consumers seem more than happy to buy just about anything Nintendo slaps its logo on these days.
I admit I've disliked the path Nintendo has taken much of this generation, though am not at all surprised by it. Its adopted many of the same publishing tactics that the industry's lowest denominators do (e.g., releasing incomplete games, hyping up micro-transactions, and preying on FOMO by setting up fake supply/demand issues), and seems like its happy to take the cheapest (and most profitable) course possible at practically every turn (e.g., Wii U ports, bare-bones ports, the Lite).
We all know this industry is as greedy as any other, but Nintendo often displayed a reticence to go down these "race to the bottom" paths. I guess Nintendo decided to go "all-in" this generation. It's making hand-over-fists, so I get the risk-adverse, minimum approach. Regardless, I guess I find that reality a bit disappointing, even if there was no justification to think any more highly of Nintendo from that perspective.
Again, I like Nintendo, and its games are usually solid. As I mentioned, I'll probably pick up a Switch in another year or two. I do think the Switch-love is a bit much (and strange), with consumers still willing to happily overpay for old games, and give Nintendo huge passes for its marketing tricks. I don't share the same affection for this "new" Nintendo, which IMHO, is now much more akin to deploy the same hijinx all the other big (and bad) publishers do.
Sorry for the long rant. All of this is to say that I'm (still) passing on the Switch.