[quote name='BigDirty'][quote name='larrytrain']Are some of you for real?
I hope to god the people complaining the most are not adults, that would just be pathetic.
You're blatantly ripping off Target, yet you somehow justify it as if you're really going to buy $100+ in other goods every time you go there when your sole purpose is to save $20-$30 on the cost of a game.
Get real. If Target (or any store for that matter) sold all their merchandise for 30-60% under WHOLESALE they would not be in business.
There's a difference between a good deal, a loophole, and taking advantage of someone (or a store). And, that's what you are doing with these rainchecks.
The fact is you only have yourselves to blame for your 'poor customer service' experiences. I think it's outrageous to make this claim when you are purposely committing fraud.
Stop whining. If you can't afford to pay full retail when a game is released, either stop buying games at that point or get a job that will let you.[/quote]
[quote name='Trakan']
This is Target's store policy. They offer it. Nobody is ripping Target off. You tell people to quit their whining, and now you're whining. Nobody is purposely committing fraud. If Target doesn't like this policy, they can choose to discontinue it, but until they do, people will use rainchecks.[/quote]
The implied fraud comes in when a person gets the raincheck for an item that they never intended to purchase. Target reserves the rights to discontinue at any time, or to not issue to particular consumers, especially those who regularly abuse them.
Larry pretty much covered the bases, maybe not elegantly, but did. And when you're caught, realize that the game is over, especially if you actually plan on ever stepping into another target, ever. Keep up the pace of trying to fight it and work the system, a letter of PNG might not be to far behind.[/quote]
Question is how is it implied fraud if they provide an out for the raincheck to be used for substitute product? If they are legally providing a way out for a customer to use it on another similar item, such as another game, how is it implied fraud? They're making the determination that you would never use it for that title, though that's making an assumption on another person's behavior that is not a good idea to make.
If they didn't have a sub. clause on the raincheck, I can understand them getting bent out of shape on it, though they are the ones with the established policy that allows for the use off of the original product. If there wasn't such an out on the raincheck, I'd think it's a different matter.