The Democratic Candidate that Must be Embraced by True Liberals

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Texas Candidate Acknowledges Prostitution

© 2006 The Associated Press

DALLAS — A man running for state representative acknowledged that he once worked as a prostitute but said he's turned his life around and doesn't regret his past.

Tom Malin, who has also sold Mary Kay cosmetics and now markets electricity, conceded that his illicit past could cost him the nomination in the March 7 Democratic primary.

"I've made mistakes in my life, and I've stood before my creator and I've accepted responsibility for my behavior," Malin said in Friday's Dallas Morning News.

On his campaign Web page, Malin said he is "committed to giving our families a voice in Austin, with a focus on education, the economy, and restoring a 'spirit of ethics' to our State House."

He said he would stay in the race.

"I don't regret my past, nor do I wish to shut the door on my past," he said. "I think anyone who has made mistakes in their lives can be a viable member of community and society."

Malin, a former member of the Dallas Citizens Police Review Board, is a managing director for the marketing arm of a Dallas electricity provider, his Web site says.

Malin said he's been sober for 13 years after being addicted to alcohol and suffering an abusive childhood.

The Dallas Tejano Democrats endorsed Malin on Thursday, before learning of his past.

"Obviously we will have to reconsider our decision based on the new information," Chairman Domingo Garcia said.

Malin faces retired salesman Jack Borden in the Democratic primary. The winner will run against incumbent Republican Dan Branch in November to represent a district covering much of central Dallas.

Houston Chronicle
 
Ummm......... it said all that and mentioned little about his political views. If you want to talk about "true liberals" I don't think they care one way or another whether he was a prostitute or not. At least I know I don't.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Ummm......... it said all that and mentioned little about his political views. If you want to talk about "true liberals" I don't think they care one way or another whether he was a prostitute or not. At least I know I don't.[/QUOTE]
Or, you read to much into these stupid articles PAD posts.
 
He should have learned from Clinton's "I didn't inhale" and Bush's refusal to answer questions about his coke-laden past, clammed his yap shut, and remained politically viable.

That having been said, the amount of money the porn industry makes in one year suggests that most people's public views on sex and pornography suggest that the American public is full of shit.

Face it kids: in the future, if you continue to elect public officials who have no drug experience, deviant past, or bizzare sexual encounters, the more you're going to be electing a government that, in toto, is completely oblivious to how the majority of American people live. On the other hand, if your formative years resemble Keith Richards, then perhaps you're unsuitable for office.

Of course, if he were a Republican, PAD would have accepted the statement "I've made mistakes in my life, and I've stood before my creator and I've accepted responsibility for my behavior" at face value, and immediately considered him a politically viable candidate. Such as it is, he's a Democrat, and this whole thread is a moot point, given that PAD wouldn't endorse any Democrat, no matter how squeaky clean their past was.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Of course, if he were a Republican, PAD would have accepted the statement "I've made mistakes in my life, and I've stood before my creator and I've accepted responsibility for my behavior" at face value, and immediately considered him a politically viable candidate. Such as it is, he's a Democrat, and this whole thread is a moot point, given that PAD wouldn't endorse any Democrat, no matter how squeaky clean their past was.[/QUOTE]

That goes without saying. But I'm wondering what PAD's particular beef with this guy is? He says he's been sober for 13 years after an alcohol problem. Reminds you of Bush.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Face it kids: in the future, if you continue to elect public officials who have no drug experience, deviant past, or bizzare sexual encounters, the more you're going to be electing a government that, in toto, is completely oblivious to how the majority of American people live.[/quote]

Actually, I suspect that you'd instead wind up with a government filled with utter liars. Someone who says they have nothing to hide is lying through their teeth (well, unless they willing to tell you all sorts of disgusting details...) EVERYONE has parts of their lives they're not particularly proud of and wouldn't want paraded around publicly. its just part of being human.


Of course, if he were a Republican, PAD would have accepted the statement "I've made mistakes in my life, and I've stood before my creator and I've accepted responsibility for my behavior" at face value, and immediately considered him a politically viable candidate. Such as it is, he's a Democrat, and this whole thread is a moot point, given that PAD wouldn't endorse any Democrat, no matter how squeaky clean their past was.

Unless they're not running. Witness PAD's rather belated love of Hackett.
 
[quote name='elprincipe']What a reliable source :roll:[/QUOTE]
Yea, it's obvious the film was doctored and that scene never happened.:roll:
 
The smoking gun extremely reliable, not saying they are perfect but I have never heard of them pushing anything false.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']Texans have elected whores before like DeLay. Why should this guy be any different?[/QUOTE]

:lol:

So true.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']Texans have elected whores before like DeLay. Why should this guy be any different?[/QUOTE]

If Tom DeLay came to your house, would you buy Mary Kay cosmetics?
 
bread's done
Back
Top