The President with the lowest approval rating of all time is...

Ikohn4ever

CAGiversary!
Feedback
5 (100%)
Drumroll please.


This Guy
r2815245774jpgx199y345shi8.jpg

Worse than Watergate: Bush scores lowest presidential approval rating EVER!

The 2008 presidential race must be an incredibly welcome development for President Bush and his White House. That's because the American body politic can only really focus on one thing at a time, and so there's little time for anything else aside from the madcap antics of of Gilligan, the Skipper, the Millionaire and his wife, the Movie Star, the Professor and Mary Ann...and the rest. Some liberal blogs and right-wing talk radio are lined up in circular firing squads, and the op-ed columnists have trained their fire on Hillary's lonely teardrops or Barack's Church of the Poison Mind.


While no one was looking, the economy nosedived, gas prices have soared, the war in Iraq is as unpopular as ever and Osama bin Laden is still on the loose. And so while none of us were paying attention, our 43rd president just hit a major milestone.
George W. Bush is now the most unpopular president in recorded American history.
Worse than Richard Nixon in the days before he resigned in disgrace during Watergate, worse than Jimmy Carter during the Iran hostage crisis, much worse than Bill Clinton when he was impeached. Just as Roger Bannister raced through what once seemed the unreachable 4-minute mile, Bush has burst through a barrier once also thought impossible, below the 20-percent mark.
Check this out:
George W. Bush's overall job approval rating has dropped to a new low in American Research Group polling as 78% of Americans say that the national economy is getting worse according to the latest survey from the American Research Group. Among all Americans, 19% approve of the way Bush is handling his job as president and 77% disapprove. When it comes to Bush's handling of the economy, 14% approve and 79% disapprove.
Among Americans registered to vote, 18% approve of the way Bush is handling his job as president and 78% disapprove.
That is just mind-blowing. How does it compare to other presidents? There's no comparison.
Nixon, as he was hounded out of office in August 1974, never dipped below the mid-20s.
Here's a pretty good compilation of poll numbers from Roper. To summarize the highlights:
Clinton low: 36 percent, May 1993 (early missteps like Zoe Baird)
George H.W. Bush low: 29 percent, August 1992 (recession)
Reagan low: 35 percent, January 1983 (recession)
Carter low: 28 percent, July 1979 (high gas prices)
Ford low: 37 percent, January 1975 (economy, Nixon pardon)
Nixon low: 23 percent, January 1974 (Watergate)
Johnson low: 35 percent, August 1968 (Vietnam)
Lowest ever? That would be Harry Truman during the Korean War, in February 1952, at 22 percent.


And so now George W. Bush has shattered a record that has stood for 55 long years, and there's not any one reason. It's everything, although I suspect that liberals would more likely say Iraq and torture, conservatives would say immigration and runaway spending, and everyone would now say the economy.
It takes more than unpopularity to become the worst president ever, but this may be the straw that broke the camel's back on that front. It should remind us all what the 2008 election is all about, and it's not about Hillary's wardrobe or an off-the-cuff remark or who is the Second Coming of Ronald Reagan.
It's only about who can undo the damage of the last eight years. It's amazing so many people wanted such a difficult task.




the real question is how low can he go, especially if that cease fire ends in Iraq
 
Nice article Ikohn4ever.

So conservatives, whats wrong with this story?

Where is your tinfoil hat theory level1?

Whats your beef with the data BigT/thrust, where is it inaccurate?
 
WHATEVER, we are freeing people in Iraq and Afghanistan

THINK ABOUT IT, if they're not free they're gonna keep bombing us.

McCAIN 2008!
 
[quote name='mykevermin']The funny thing is that the economy hasn't even really started to tank yet.[/quote]

I have read a report that some economic analysts are predicting that 2009 will be worse than 2008. Bush will be out of office then....

Who knows...with Raul Castro taking over Cuba, there may be a economic incentive to lift the embargo. Of course, I serious doubt it will happen though.
 
If I'm reading that Roper link right, though, he also has ... the HIGHEST approval ratings of any of those presidents? Those numbers are from October 8 & 9, 2001, but still, 92%?
 
I'm confused.

Why isn't he being impeached, if America doesn't like what he's doing to America?

And why is Ellen Page's vein in her left arm so enormous?
 
[quote name='Koggit']I'm confused.

Why isn't he being impeached, if America doesn't like what he's doing to America?

And why is Ellen Page's vein in her left arm so enormous?[/QUOTE]

People don't get impeached just because you don't like them (all Clinton jokes aside).
 
[quote name='Koggit']I'm confused.

Why isn't he being impeached, if America doesn't like what he's doing to America?
[/quote]

How well did the impeachment work for the Republican Congress?

Bush is to non-conservatives as Hillary is to non-liberals.

The Democrats will score more points/seats with Bush staying in power.

Also, impeaching AND convicting Bush will make Cheney president.

Is the Congress going to impeach both of them at the same time?
 
Bush W. has 18%?

I estimate 15% of the population would approve even if a potato was president (as long as it was labeled democrat or republican)
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']People don't get impeached just because you don't like them (all Clinton jokes aside).[/quote]
You do know Clinton got impeached for lying under oath, not for his affair, right?
Even though he did lie for his affair... either way, you know what I mean.
 
[quote name='Autumn Star']You do know Clinton got impeached for lying under oath, not for his affair, right?
Even though he did lie for his affair... either way, you know what I mean.[/quote]

Yes, the "technical" offense was perjury, but can you find any logical rational to justify considering him for removal from office for that particular lie?

The real reason he was impeached was a combinaion of partisan politics and moral outrage about an out-of-wedlock affair that was, frankly, no one's business aside from the three people it involved.

Had there been a Democratic majority congress, or had his lie been about something of a non-sexual nature (but equally unimportant), he would not have been impeached.



And the reason Bush hasn't been impeached is because it is not such a great thing to do during war time, and also because that would just leave Cheney as President, and he's been seen to have been equally involved in the string of bad decisions and questionable statements leading up to our nation's current situation.
 
[quote name='Sleepkyng']who is ellen page?

another candidate?

you can't impeach someone from doing a bad job, unless they break the rules.

DOI![/quote]
Miss Page would be the young lady with the veiny arm.






And Bush lost any shred of credibility he had left in my eyes when he condoned treason by commuting Libby's sentance.
 
[quote name='Autumn Star']You do know Clinton got impeached for lying under oath, not for his affair, right?
Even though he did lie for his affair... either way, you know what I mean.[/QUOTE]

Re-read what I wrote again, very slowly.
 
bread's done
Back
Top