The PS2 is dominating with very good exclusive titles!

I think this is how it is.

PS2 makes some of the best single player games ever
(r&C,J&D,ff.gt.gta,the list goes on)

Xbox the best multi (halo halo and halo)

GC comes out with a good game everynow and then (legend of zelda could be the best game ever though.... It looks AWESOME!)
 
[quote name='Scorch']I think it's funny that you run out of hate for XBox Live so you start bashing the game and system. Since when is a game P2P when there's more than two people? You have to pay to play online on most PC games, usually game by game, and for your internet connection.[/quote]

I think what he meant by P2P is that a lot of Xbox multiplayer games use P2P technology instead of a client/server technology that most PC games use. P2P relies on the host user's broadband connection which is typically not as robust as a "server" in a online PC game.

As far as having to pay to play for most PC games, actually, that's not really true at all. There are no FPS games for PC that I am aware of that cost extra for online play. It is a feature that is built into most current FPS (not to mention sports and racing) PC games. In fact, that is why the majority of these games are purchased - to be played online.

MMORPGs are a different story, but you have to pay monthly fees to play them on consoles as well.

To play the typical PC game online you need a PC and a broadband connection. These are the same requirements for playing a typical online-enabled PS2 game (I don't know anyone who purchased broadband access simply for their PS2). To play online with the Xbox, you obviously have to pay for the Xbox Live service as well. I'm not willing to spend that extra amount of money just to enable my console to be playable online. $70 is a little too much for me - hey, I'm a cheapass! Sure Xbox Live is a much more standardized online experience compared to the PC (and PS2), but most PC (and PS2) users deal with the hodge-podge system they have because it's free.

Until PS2 (or PS3) starts charging for basic broadband access, I'll hold off on buying an Xbox. There just aren't enough exclusive games (that aren't FPS games - I don't do traditional FPS games on consoles) for the Xbox to warrant me spending $150. And any FPS game that's worth it's salt on the Xbox gets ported to the PC or came out on the PC first.
 
[quote name='Skitzle']I think this is how it is.

PS2 makes some of the best single player games ever
(r&C,J&D,ff.gt.gta,the list goes on)

Xbox the best multi (halo halo and halo)

GC comes out with a good game everynow and then (legend of zelda could be the best game ever though.... It looks AWESOME!)[/quote]

Yeah, I actually jumped up when I saw the video for it back in May. It was probably the biggest announcement/surprise for me in gaming history, despite how obvious it should have been. The game already looked complete, imagine how it's going to look/be when it's finally finished a year from now.
 
[quote name='Skitzle']I think this is how it is.

PS2 makes some of the best single player games ever
(r&C,J&D,ff.gt.gta,the list goes on)

Xbox the best multi (halo halo and halo)

GC comes out with a good game everynow and then (legend of zelda could be the best game ever though.... It looks AWESOME!)[/quote]

I think the GC has the better multiplayer. Sure, Xbox has Halo, but I find myself, and my friends, playing more games together on the GC. XBL is the best online multiplayer though, IMO.
 
[quote name='lebowsky']

To play the typical PC game online you need a PC and a broadband connection. These are the same requirements for playing a typical online-enabled PS2 game (I don't know anyone who purchased broadband access simply for their PS2). To play online with the Xbox, you obviously have to pay for the Xbox Live service as well. I'm not willing to spend that extra amount of money just to enable my console to be playable online. $70 is a little too much for me - hey, I'm a cheapass! Sure Xbox Live is a much more standardized online experience compared to the PC (and PS2), but most PC (and PS2) users deal with the hodge-podge system they have because it's free.

Until PS2 (or PS3) starts charging for basic broadband access, I'll hold off on buying an Xbox. There just aren't enough exclusive games (that aren't FPS games - I don't do traditional FPS games on consoles) for the Xbox to warrant me spending $150. And any FPS game that's worth it's salt on the Xbox gets ported to the PC or came out on the PC first.[/quote]

Though with the new model you PS2-PC analogy is technically correct, it used to be you had to pay about $40 (for the network adapter) to play your PS2 online.
 
[quote name='Duo_Maxwell'][quote name='lebowsky']

To play the typical PC game online you need a PC and a broadband connection. These are the same requirements for playing a typical online-enabled PS2 game (I don't know anyone who purchased broadband access simply for their PS2). To play online with the Xbox, you obviously have to pay for the Xbox Live service as well. I'm not willing to spend that extra amount of money just to enable my console to be playable online. $70 is a little too much for me - hey, I'm a cheapass! Sure Xbox Live is a much more standardized online experience compared to the PC (and PS2), but most PC (and PS2) users deal with the hodge-podge system they have because it's free.

Until PS2 (or PS3) starts charging for basic broadband access, I'll hold off on buying an Xbox. There just aren't enough exclusive games (that aren't FPS games - I don't do traditional FPS games on consoles) for the Xbox to warrant me spending $150. And any FPS game that's worth it's salt on the Xbox gets ported to the PC or came out on the PC first.[/quote]

Though with the new model you PS2-PC analogy is technically correct, it used to be you had to pay about $40 (for the network adapter) to play your PS2 online.[/quote]

Ah, you're right. How quickly I forget. But that's a $40 one time fee as opposed to a recurring annual fee for Xbox Live.
 
[quote name='Nirvanaguy777']every system has its up and downs no one systems DOMINATES over any other[/quote]

dreamcast got dominated.... even though i thought it was a good system
 
bread's done
Back
Top