The World Is About To End, Bush Takes Responsibility

Ikohn4ever

CAGiversary!
Feedback
5 (100%)
Bush: 'I take responsibility' for U.S. failures on Katrina

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.

"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government and to the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility," Bush said during a joint news conference with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

Bush said he wants to know what went right and what went wrong so that he can determine whether the United States was prepared for another storm, or an attack. (Watch the president's statement -- 1:32)

"I'm not going to defend the process going in, but I am going to defend the people who are on the front line of saving lives," Bush said. (Full story)

Earlier in the day, the White House announced the president will address the nation Thursday night about recovery efforts in the Gulf Coast.
New Orleans may lose 160,000 homes

Katrina and the floodwaters that swept through New Orleans may have damaged 160,000 homes beyond repair, an official with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Tuesday.

Col. Richard Wagenaar said that one of the local government's biggest challenges would be letting residents return to look at their homes.

Water flowed into the city from Lake Pontchartrain through five breaches in three levees after the storm hit August 29, leaving 80 percent of the city submerged. (Watch Wagenaar describe the levee repairs -- 3:34)

Workers should be able to pump the remaining water out of the city by the end of October, said Wagenaar, the New Orleans district commander of the Corps of Engineers.

"It's set up by neighborhoods," he said. "Some of them will be done by early October, other ones by mid-, late October -- if everything goes right, Mother Nature doesn't give us any rain and our pumps continue working."

Wagenaar said the process would speed up once water recedes around the city's main pumping station -- Pump Station No. 6 -- and its 1920s-era pumps can go back online. That's not expected for another two weeks. (Watch the efforts to pump New Orleans dry -- 2:40)

He said that workers were focusing on making "semi-permanent" repairs to the levee system that protects the low-lying city -- that could take two or three months. More permanent fixes would be made once investigators have determined why the levees failed.

The Corps of Engineers hasn't completed surveys of the levees outside the city, but Wagenaar said they appeared to be badly damaged. Some areas remain inaccessible and can only be looked at from the air.

"The levee at the Mississippi River and Gulf outlet is virtually gone," he said. In the event of another hurricane or strong tropical storm, St. Bernard Parish, east of New Orleans, would "have zero protection on one side of their parish at this time."

Ninety percent of the 10-mile-long, 17-foot-high levee on the east flank of the river is gone, leaving only a small, 60-foot-long levee intact.

"Should another storm come in, it could do more damage than it already has," Wagenaar added.
Bodies found in hospital

Rescue workers have removed 45 bodies from a downtown New Orleans hospital that was surrounded by floodwaters from Katrina, a spokeswoman for the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals said.

The bodies were recovered Sunday from Memorial Medical Center, spokeswoman Melissa Walker said.

Tenet Healthcare Corp., the company that owns the hospital, said in a statement that "a significant number had passed before the hurricane." (Watch the grim process of recovering victims -- 1:34)

Tenet spokesman Steven Campanini wrote that the hospital was told Wednesday "that we were on our own to evacuate, [and] we brought our own helicopters to take the patients out."

He said, "Every living patient was evacuated by Friday afternoon."

The statement said that once all of the patients were evacuated, officials brought in guards to secure the hospital until the coroner could remove the bodies.

Officials have confirmed 279 deaths in Louisiana in the wake of the hurricane.
Other developments

# The acting head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency told reporters Tuesday that the agency would focus on getting evacuees out of shelters and into more permanent homes. David Paulison, a 30-year veteran of fire and rescue work, was appointed Monday after Michael Brown resigned. (Watch Paulison discuss FEMA's plans)

# Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco lashed out at FEMA on Tuesday for what she said was a "lack of urgency and lack of respect" involving the recovery of bodies of Hurricane Katrina victims. Blanco said she ordered the state to sign a contract with Kenyon International Monday, after Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff failed to live up to a promise to sign a contract with the organization.

# New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin said Tuesday if an EPA water quality report comes back with the expected good results, he will reopen parts of New Orleans, including the French Quarter, for business next week.

# Authorities were considering launching a criminal investigation into the failure to evacuate St. Rita's Nursing Home in St. Bernard Parish. Thirty-four residents died when the facility was flooded. Repeated attempts by CNN to reach the nursing home's owners for comment have been unsuccessful. Authorities said they too have been unable to find them.

# The Department of Homeland security reportedly plans to send a team of about 30 investigators and auditors to the Gulf Coast to make sure that relief aid is spent properly, according to The Associated Press.
 
Satan-Bush.gif


Here is the source of the problem, stop worshipping Satan!

cp_bushsatan.gif
 
Bush didn't actually take responsibility for anything. Just look at the words around his "I take responsibility" - "to the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right" So, what exactly IS the federal government's job in a situation like this?

The reality is that if you'd get into any specifics - "why didn't the federal goverment do X" - I guarantee you that you're always going to get the same answer - "That's not the federal government's job, that was the state/local government's job". Bush once again says something sort of meaningful, but if you think about it for even a few seconds, you realize that he said nothing at all.
 
[quote name='Drocket']Bush didn't actually take responsibility for anything. Just look at the words around his "I take responsibility" - "to the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right" So, what exactly IS the federal government's job in a situation like this?

The reality is that if you'd get into any specifics - "why didn't the federal goverment do X" - I guarantee you that you're always going to get the same answer - "That's not the federal government's job, that was the state/local government's job". Bush once again says something sort of meaningful, but if you think about it for even a few seconds, you realize that he said nothing at all.[/QUOTE]


You're wrong. If you're looking for fault, you will find it. If you're looking for good, you will find that as well.

For years now, the democrats have been screaming for Bush to take responsibility for something. He actually says the words "I take responsibility", and it's still not good enough.

How much more clear does the President need to make it? You tell me, what is an acceptable answer? Is there one, or will you complain no matter what?
 
Well, for one thing, he could try saying "I take responsibility" without surrounding it with weasel words.

For another, he could give a specific example of what went wrong that he's taking responsibility for (preferably along with a plan of action to prevent that mistake from happening again.)

This is 'taking responsibility' in the same sense that "I'm sorry you're so stupid" is an apology.
 
[quote name='Derwood43']You're wrong. If you're looking for fault, you will find it. If you're looking for good, you will find that as well.

For years now, the democrats have been screaming for Bush to take responsibility for something. He actually says the words "I take responsibility", and it's still not good enough.

How much more clear does the President need to make it? You tell me, what is an acceptable answer? Is there one, or will you complain no matter what?[/QUOTE]


I think the issue is this may weasel out of it. Like earlier, when he said the response was "not acceptable", then eventually he weaseled out and said everyone was doing a great just.
 
bread's done
Back
Top