These People: So Misunderstood, They Really Do Deserve Our Understanding

PittsburghAfterDark

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Flames of hate
By Luke David, Evening Standard
20 May 2005
Muslim protesters today called for the bombing of New York in a demonstration outside the US embassy in London.

There were threats of "another 9/11" from militants angry at reports of the desecration of the Koran by US troops in Iraq.

Some among the crowd burned an effigy of Tony Blair on a crucifix and then set fire to a Union flag and a Stars and Stripes.

Led by a man on a megaphone, they chanted, "USA watch your back, Osama is coming back" and "Kill, kill USA, kill, kill George Bush". A small detail of police watched as they shouted: "Bomb, bomb New York" and "George Bush, you will pay, with your blood, with your head."

Demonstrators in Grosvenor Square, some with their faces covered with scarves, waved placards which included the message: "Desecrate today and see another 9/11 tomorrow."

The protest was organised by groups including the Muslim Council for Britain and the Muslim Parliamentary Association of the UK. Their protest follows fury in the Islamic world over the claims in a Newsweek magazine that US soldiers at Guantanamo Bay had abused the Koran.

The magazine later withdrew the article and apologised but not before it triggered riots in Afghanistan in which 17 people died and 100 people were injured.

Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Martin Mubanga told the crowd he had seen a copy of the Koran "desecrated" during his time at Camp Delta.

He said: "This was one of the methods they used, throwing the Koran, my Koran, on the floor in my cell."

One of the protesters called for the release of radical Muslim cleric Abu Hamza. He shouted: "Your so-called democracy will fall under the sword of Allah. The day of judgment is coming."

The demonstration coincided with protests across the world. On the West Bank 2,500 Palestinians streamed out of mosques shouting "Death to America". In Calcutta, India, protesters burned, spat and urinated on the US flag. And in Somalia thousands chanted anti-US slogans.
Link

I wonder, how many replies will it take for me to be labled racist or bigot?
 
So we flush their book down the toilet one time....they've been burning our flag for years, so tell em to shut the fuck up.
 
What do you expect? We've illegally invaded & occupied a soverign nation with no ties to terrorism. We're bullying other countries all around the globe such as Venezuela. We support Israel. With war crimes popping up left and right from our soldiers, do you still expect them to "welcome us with flowers"?
 
Well, given that one of your posts had to be modded to censor your racist remarks, I don't care if you want to read me "Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good Very Bad Day." You're still a racist.

Relevant to the news post, I'm glad to see that the neoconservative agenda has been so successful in spreading democracy that freedom loving people and freedom haters alike are finally realizing that the Bush administration's techniques have worked so famously. Oh, hold on...what's that? Terrorist attacks triple from 2003 to 2004? My, who said that? It's our good friend Reuters! Everybody say hello!

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8303104&src=eDialog/GetContent

myke.
...PAD, I'm not sure how, in light of the Bush administration's methods of preemptive war, of "crusades," of "smoking them out of their holes," that these "evil doers" are fighting back louder and more frequently than ever can only be surprising to a complete fucking buffoon.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Title worded to suggest all muslims are terrorists or supporters, therefore PAD=bigot. Tell me, where do yo buy your sheets?[/QUOTE]

The title of the story, or this thread ?

I fail to see how "these people" is a racist, or bigotted bias. The story is about people professing terrorists acts, so maybe PAD just hates terrorists who walk around shouting how they want to kill americans and behead George Bush. Nothing wrong with that, I guess. I might like to meybe invite some of "those people" over to my house so they could bomb me and my family into oblivion. Better yet, what's your address?
 
[quote name='bmulligan']The title of the story, or this thread ?

I fail to see how "these people" is a racist, or bigotted bias. The story is about people professing terrorists acts, so maybe PAD just hates terrorists who walk around shouting how they want to kill americans and behead George Bush. Nothing wrong with that, I guess. I might like to meybe invite some of "those people" over to my house so they could bomb me and my family into oblivion. Better yet, what's your address?[/QUOTE]

My troll alert was just raised to code red.
 
[quote name='camoor']My troll alert was just raised to code red.[/QUOTE]

It must take a biggot to know trolls from regular people. You can put away you Gaydar too, I don't swing that way.
 
[quote name='bmulligan']The title of the story, or this thread ?

I fail to see how "these people" is a racist, or bigotted bias. The story is about people professing terrorists acts, so maybe PAD just hates terrorists who walk around shouting how they want to kill americans and behead George Bush. Nothing wrong with that, I guess. I might like to meybe invite some of "those people" over to my house so they could bomb me and my family into oblivion. Better yet, what's your address?[/QUOTE]

The titled of his thread. You, and everyone else, know PAD's history. We know he finds it ridiculous, and has repeatedly said it, at the concept of understanding islam, muslims, and why many hate us. He has made topic titles referring to comments people made, and he has recently crossed into blatantly racist comments. He has made statements about how he was thrilled to kill "islamofascists" when he claimed to have been a gulf war veteran (odd comment since he would have fought a secular government, and defended the more religious one), he has made repeated updates of his "religion of peace" posts, and recently with different names, with the intent to show muslims, and islam, as a hateful, vile religion. There is a clear history to this. There are two ways to interperet that title, one as I did. The other as directly referring to these people, but that would be an awkward way of wording it unless he meant it in jest (ie. we need to understand why they hate us, but these wackos over here aren't the ones I'm referring too), and extremely uncharacteristic of PAD and his posts, even stranger at a time when he is becoming more blatantly racist, not less. To say the title did not have a bigotted meaning would be to ignore the consistent pattern and style of PAD's posts.

These People: So Misunderstood, They Really Do Deserve Our Understanding​
 
[quote name='bmulligan']It must take a biggot to know trolls from regular people. You can put away you Gaydar too, I don't swing that way.[/QUOTE]

LOL what? And what does gayness have to do with any of this?
 
[quote name='camoor']LOL what? And what does gayness have to do with any of this?[/QUOTE]

Maybe PAD was dating a muslim guy who dumped him saying homosexuality and premarital sex was a sin against allah. Maybe his bigoty is just all revenge for having his heart broken?
 
Nah, I wasn't dumped by a muslim guy. Then again, you really aren't that smart to make the accusation you just made are you?

I mean, how could someone be dumped by a guy that thought homosexuality was a sin to begin with?

Guess I was right to call you all a bunch of short bus riding wonder tards after all.

I really only hate people that want to kill me, you and see our country go down in flames. Aparrently in your books we need to understand these people and be tolerant of their religion. You're all so very, very clever. Just what will you do if thousands of Americans are killed again?

Say we deserved it? Blame me for posting the truth about islam? How about blame Bush? Amazing how you will tolerate people with murder in their hearts, words and actions but think Christians are a far greater threat to your way of life.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Nah, I wasn't dumped by a muslim guy. Then again, you really aren't that smart to make the accusation you just made are you?

I mean, how could someone be dumped by a guy that thought homosexuality was a sin to begin with?

Guess I was right to call you all a bunch of short bus riding wonder tards after all.

I really only hate people that want to kill me, you and see our country go down in flames. Aparrently in your books we need to understand these people and be tolerant of their religion. You're all so very, very clever. Just what will you do if thousands of Americans are killed again?

Say we deserved it? Blame me for posting the truth about islam? How about blame Bush? Amazing how you will tolerate people with murder in their hearts, words and actions but think Christians are a far greater threat to your way of life.[/QUOTE]

I don't think any of us argued that we should "tolerate" terrorist organizations, I think the few on this board would (with the clear exception of you) not suggest that "muslim=terrorist," and many of us would love to see al-qaeda and its leadership gone for good.

Show us where our posts in this thread prove what you're arguing - that we think christians are a greater threat than terrorists. While you're doing that, I'll be reading this article about Pat Robertson's suggestion that 'activist judges' are more threatening than al qaeda, the third reich, and the confederacy on George Stephanopolous' program - oh, there's a video! http://mediamatters.org/static/video/thisweek-200505020003.mov)

Go back and read the Reuters link I posted; that is my concern about this administration's approach to terrorism - more terrorist activities are becoming, for the moment, the result. I don't see how our actions can be considered to be 'successful' when more terrorists activities are happening. Would you keep your job as a manager at a factory if accidents tripled in the 2 years following a large push to reduce them to 0?

Finally, it would appear that one to two people made jokes about your sexuality, and your response is "no wonder you all are (something typically hateful and disrespectful)." I'm glad to see that two person's comment satisfy your ability to say "all of you," and I now understand how your mind works in generalizing all christians as repressed heroes and muslims as horrible terrorists. Such a simple world to live in, then, is it not? I'm very jealous of your ability to trollop through life so blissfully ignorant of complexity.

myke.
...I don't like fundamentalist anything; it just stands to say that, at this moment, the christian right is becoming much more overtly politically active outside and inside capitol hill; this has a more immediate impact on me as a person, and I do feel threatened. I similarly despise the patriarchy inherent in most practitioners of the muslim faith (though I find it *hilarious* that christians ever bring this up as though they've done nothing of the sort); given the stance of muslims in this world against us, though, I can wait to want to destroy their patriarchal attitudes until they have a more equal footing relative to society (one in which terrorist activity no longer remains that most readily available form of negotiation for them).
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']I really only hate people that want to kill me, you and see our country go down in flames. Aparrently in your books we need to understand these people and be tolerant of their religion. You're all so very, very clever. Just what will you do if thousands of Americans are killed again?

Say we deserved it? Blame me for posting the truth about islam? How about blame Bush? Amazing how you will tolerate people with murder in their hearts, words and actions but think Christians are a far greater threat to your way of life.[/QUOTE]

Okay, if anyone thinks PAD is not a racist after reading this is an idiot.

He just said all muslims are terrorists.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Okay, if anyone thinks PAD is not a racist after reading this is an idiot.

He just said all muslims are terrorists.[/QUOTE]

And you try to get across a message of all conservatives are douche bags in all your posts.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark'] Amazing how you will tolerate people with murder in their hearts, words and actions but think Christians are a far greater threat to your way of life.[/QUOTE]

No, I'd say neocons masquerading as christians and the general ignorance of 51% of the American public are the bigger threat.
 
[quote name=' Posted By Me']

Maybe PAD was dating a muslim guy who dumped him saying homosexuality and premarital sex was a sin against allah. Maybe his bigoty is just all revenge for having his heart broken?[/quote]

[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Nah, I wasn't dumped by a muslim guy. Then again, you really aren't that smart to make the accusation you just made are you?

I mean, how could someone be dumped by a guy that thought homosexuality was a sin to begin with?

Guess I was right to call you all a bunch of short bus riding wonder tards after all
[/QUOTE]


Ya know, only an idiot would take that seriously and not as a joke, and it seems like you took it seriously.

Blame me for posting the truth about islam?
Click to expand...

Point, set, match. PAD seems to like proving our point.
 
[quote name='Rich']And you try to get across a message of all conservatives are douche bags in all your posts.[/QUOTE]

I'd rather have people think I'm a douche bag than a terrorist
 
[quote name='mykevermin']...I don't like fundamentalist anything; it just stands to say that, at this moment, the christian right is becoming much more overtly politically active outside and inside capitol hill; this has a more immediate impact on me as a person, and I do feel threatened. I similarly despise the patriarchy inherent in most practitioners of the muslim faith (though I find it *hilarious* that christians ever bring this up as though they've done nothing of the sort); given the stance of muslims in this world against us, though, I can wait to want to destroy their patriarchal attitudes until they have a more equal footing relative to society (one in which terrorist activity no longer remains that most readily available form of negotiation for them).[/QUOTE]

Agreed.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']
Originally Posted by PittsburghAfterDark
I really only hate people that want to kill me, you and see our country go down in flames. Aparrently in your books we need to understand these people and be tolerant of their religion. You're all so very, very clever. Just what will you do if thousands of Americans are killed again?

Say we deserved it? Blame me for posting the truth about islam? How about blame Bush? Amazing how you will tolerate people with murder in their hearts, words and actions but think Christians are a far greater threat to your way of life.
Click to expand...
Okay, if anyone thinks PAD is not a racist after reading this is an idiot.

He just said all muslims are terrorists.[/QUOTE]


Actually his anger was directed at the 'people who want to kill me'. Perhaps he meant to say "their version of the truth about islam" later on and you are just interpreting it as "racism" (which it's not becuase islamism is not contained within 1 race or culture of people) with your hypersensitive racism indicating radar device.

So, fundamentally, you are wrong when you cry racism. Find another term or just continue to display your ignorance.
 
[quote name='bmulligan']Actually his anger was directed at the 'people who want to kill me'. Perhaps he meant to say "their version of the truth about islam" later on and you are just interpreting it as "racism" (which it's not becuase islamism is not contained within 1 race or culture of people) with your hypersensitive racism indicating radar device.

So, fundamentally, you are wrong when you cry racism. Find another term or just continue to display your ignorance.[/QUOTE]

Fundamentally nothing; PAD speaks in absolutes, at least that's how it seems. You're criticizing Quackzilla for reading into PAD's words by positing your own interpretation. If you weren't putting words in his mouth, you wouldn't start off a sentence by typing "Perhaps he meant to say...". So, this technique isn't going to win you any debate club awards, that's for sure.

With that in mind, let's try a little experiment. I'm going to type a sentence, and I encourage PAD to respond with nothing more than a simple "true" or "false."

Here goes...

"There is no such thing as a good muslim."

myke.
...eagerly awaiting your response.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']I'd rather have people think I'm a douche bag than a terrorist[/QUOTE]

So you defend Quack but not PAD?

No double standards here, folks.
 
[quote name='Rich']So you defend Quack but not PAD?

No double standards here, folks.[/QUOTE]

Not defending, saying it was a bad example. Calling all followers of a religion terrorists, and calling all followers of a political ideology douche bags are on entirely different levels. And, calling someone a terrorist is much worse than douche bad.

Also, bmulligan, he got censored by shrike in this one http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52333, and punqsux (with comments by stealthy) in this one http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52249
 
[quote name='bmulligan']Actually his anger was directed at the 'people who want to kill me'. Perhaps he meant to say "their version of the truth about islam" later on and you are just interpreting it as "racism" (which it's not becuase islamism is not contained within 1 race or culture of people) with your hypersensitive racism indicating radar device.

So, fundamentally, you are wrong when you cry racism. Find another term or just continue to display your ignorance.[/QUOTE]

Wow, you are so closeminded in your republican beliefs that you will defend a blatant racist just because he calls himself a republican.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Wow, you are so closeminded in your republican beliefs that you will defend a blatant racist just because he calls himself a republican.[/QUOTE]

Blasting militant islam is not racist. There is no "muslim" race. You really are a tard.

"There is no good mulim."

That statement is false. There are plenty of good ones. They're dead.

I keeeed I keeeeed!
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Blasting militant islam is not racist. There is no "muslim" race. You really are a tard.

"There is no good mulim."

That statement is false. There are plenty of good ones. They're dead.

I keeeed I keeeeed![/QUOTE]

Since when have you ever made a distinction, before now, between Islam and militant Islam? And, besides, racism is often used to refer to prejudice outside of racial prejudice.
 
Yeah, PAD was attacking the religion of Islam as a whole, he only flip flopped and changed his stance after we called him out as a racist.

And besides, it became a racial issue when you called Arabs "camel humping towel heads who don't deserve our respect".
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Since when have you ever made a distinction, before now, between Islam and militant Islam? And, besides, racism is often used to refer to prejudice outside of racial prejudice.[/QUOTE]

We've been down this road before. PAD is elaborating out of necessity, because too many people are saying that his arguing in absolute terms is incorrect, lazy, and racist. It is racist on the behalf of PAD because his most recent post has been his only attempt to say something akin to, "What I *really* meant to say was..."

We can now return to your regularly scheduled overgeneralizations.

myke.
...is what you just posted what PAD had said in the other thread, or something you're just generalizing?
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Yeah, PAD was attacking the religion of Islam as a whole, he only flip flopped and changed his stance after we called him out as a racist.
[/QUOTE]

And you attack the entire right side as a whole.
 
[quote name='Rich']And you attack the entire right side as a whole.[/QUOTE]

Yes, that is why I voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.

I only attack the far right and fanatics.

It only seems like I attack republicans as a whole because the fanatics make up a majority of the republicans in the government.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Yes, that is why I voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.

I only attack the far right and fanatics.

It only seems like I attack republicans as a whole because the fanatics make up a majority of the republicans in the government.[/QUOTE]

:lol:

The 2000 Primary. McCain isn't even on the right, he just needs a platform to run under. He's as centrist as it gets, and as such, he has my full support for '08.

If Kerry was elected, liberal fanatics would make up the government. I get the feeling you wouldn't be attacking the liberals in office.

Though I don't support either extreme, at least the extreme right is FOR the country.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Yes, that is why I voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.

I only attack the far right and fanatics.

It only seems like I attack republicans as a whole because the fanatics make up a majority of the republicans in the government.[/QUOTE]

Do you live in a state that lets anyone vote in any primary, or are you a registered Republican?

The Republican party is, for the most part sompletely centered on their neocon agenda; sure, a great portion of it falls in line completely with the general ideologies of the Republican party. Consider, however, the treatment of those Republicans who have stood up, even for a moment, to what the Republicans in power (whether they represent the majority of people is another story):

Arlen Specter
George Voinovich
Jim Jeffords
John McCain

Also, consider the democrats that they side with; the Republicans are willing to work together with the Democrats who represent their ideology in totem (consider that old wacky Dixiecrat Zell Miller). On the contrary, if the Democrats worked the same style of "bipartisanship" that the Republicans did, they would filibuster all judicial nominees, instead of voting 197 out of 207 into their appointed positions. Look, the Republicans have a 95% success rate of getting judicial nominees accepted since Bush has taken office; how moderate is it to try to change the rules of congress to make sure that *every goddam one* of them gets approved?

myke.
...it's easy to ridicule Republicans in power for being fascist kooks who favor big business over the individual's interest, because that's *what they do.* On the other hand, I feel sympathy for someone who believes that the Republican party has their best interests in mind (which only is true if you are in the top 1% of wage earners; I'd love to hear how much any of Bush's plans have benefitted you if you're in the other 99%).
 
[quote name='Rich']Though I don't support either extreme, at least the extreme right is FOR the country.[/QUOTE]

Uhh, if the extreme right is PRO-USA, why are they allied with Saudi Arabia and it's royal family?

19 of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, about four times as many than from Afganistan.

No, the far right is pro-oil, anti-USA; which is why they can kiss my ass and burn in hell.



And by the way, the voter registration papers did not ask for political affiliation (I live in VA).
 
[quote name='Rich']Though I don't support either extreme, at least the extreme right is FOR the country.[/QUOTE]

I'm afraid that automobile magnets don't immediately qualify as being "for" the country.

I don't understand this horseshit simple-minded mentality that liberals are "against" America. You know what I'm against? I'm against Oligarchy; what we have in our government, left and right, is pure cronyism and special interest. You live in a democracy, yet how likely is it that you could ever gain an audience with one of your state senators? Sure, you could talk to Daisy at the office, but that's as far as you're going to get. The point is this: there are people who do have access that you do not. That is neither surprising nor disturbing. What is, in my opinion, is the belief that people's access to people in positions of political power is completely contingent upon the amount of financial capital they hold. They shape tax policy; they shape environmental restriction; they shape trade agreements; they shape what our government values enough to deliberate on the floor; they shape our social security policy; they shape our international policy. What was the last thing you actively had a hand in creating, politically speaking?

Where is your access? Where is your power? You live in a democracy, dammit, how dare you capitulate while claiming the greatness of the hand that helps feed those who are already well-fed?

The fundamental question is this: At what point in time has the Bush administration, or any Republican-sponsored bill proposed in the last 5 years, helped the people at large to the detriment of big business?

myke.
...if I hear a goddamn word about how wonderful tax breaks are, I'm going to start a fucking collection to purchase a vasectomy, so you fucking whelp offspring won't have to grow up in a world covering debt that we continued to amount; tax cuts are only beneficial if you don't have any children (then you don't need to give a shit about who pays taxes after you die).
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Uhh, if the extreme right is PRO-USA, why are they allied with Saudi Arabia and it's royal family?

19 of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, about four times as many than from Afganistan.

No, the far right is pro-oil, anti-USA; which is why they can kiss my ass and burn in hell.



And by the way, the voter registration papers did not ask for political affiliation (I live in VA).[/QUOTE]

Pro-oil > flag burning far left.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']
...if I hear a goddamn word about how wonderful tax breaks are, I'm going to start a fucking collection to purchase a vasectomy, so you fucking whelp offspring won't have to grow up in a world covering debt that we continued to amount; tax cuts are only beneficial if you don't have any children (then you don't need to give a shit about who pays taxes after you die).[/QUOTE]

VASECTOMIES FOR EVERYONE!!!
 
[quote name='Rich']Pro-oil > flag burning far left.[/QUOTE]

Ok, some radical somewhere burned a flag. How is this worse then the fact that 1500 patriotic soldiers have died so that we can lock down a source of oil, in a war that was sold to the American people under the guise of spreading Democracy?
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Blasting militant islam is not racist. There is no "muslim" race. You really are a tard.

"There is no good mulim."

That statement is false. There are plenty of good ones. They're dead.

I keeeed I keeeeed![/QUOTE]


There's the saying that there's truth in any joke. The truth in that "joke" that you told was that you must actually believe it to some certain extent, otherwise you wouldn't have said it. The simple fact that you would think of something like that is proof enough.

While a racist joke is nothing as serious as a violent act against that person it still has the effect of creating division. Sure you can say, "well I was only kidding" but regardless of whether you say that or mean it, the result is fundamentally the same.
 
Wow... I'm not reading any of that crap... Lets just agree PAD is a right wing fundamentalist nutjob and all agree to just ignore him.

Myke- You've got to hate him more than you do me.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Yeah, PAD was attacking the religion of Islam as a whole, he only flip flopped and changed his stance after we called him out as a racist.

And besides, it became a racial issue when you called Arabs "camel humping towel heads who don't deserve our respect".[/QUOTE]

I never said this about arabs. I said that "these camel humping towel heads really deserve our respect".

If you're going to quote me get it right

I'm not changing my stance, they're still camel humping towel heads.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']I never said this about arabs. I said that "these camel humping towel heads really deserve our respect".

If you're going to quote me get it right

I'm not changing my stance, they're still camel humping towel heads.[/QUOTE]

Seems like you just negated your "they're not all bad" comment. And since he's talking about arabs, he's also a racist (someone said he isn't since he was talking about muslims before).
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Arabs aren't a race either. Keep trying though, you'll get it soon enough![/QUOTE]

They're an ethnic group, but nobody, save a few, uses the term 'ethnicist.'

You remind me of someone who wanted the entire population of an ethnic group/race dead and heavily favored christianity...man, who was he...funny walk and all...lots of complicit followers...I can't seem to remember.

myke.
...how about *you* come up with a term to describe your intellectually lazy, overgeneralized dichotomy? "Asshole"? "Fascist"? "fucking Asshole"? In the meantime, I'll just use what's most appropriate: "Nazi."
 
Asshole works. You can call me asshole all day long. I really don't care.

You know what's so great about the dichotomy with the people you're defending while attacking me? I don't want them dead yet they want you dead.

You're going to be very, very hard pressed to find a militant sect of Judiasm that was waging terrorist warfare against Germans in the 1920's and 1930's. You're going to be harder pressed still to find a silent majority of Jews supporting such non-existent terrorism.

So basically you're saying; because I dislike a group of people that are tacitly approving of killing Americans and westerners by silence or active participation I am equal to a political party that scapegoated a religion for every social ill their nation experienced?

Go re-read your history before you make blanket statments that put your intellect in league with a jackass.

Have a nice one!
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Asshole works. You can call me asshole all day long. I really don't care.

You know what's so great about the dichotomy with the people you're defending while attacking me? I don't want them dead yet they want you dead.

You're going to be very, very hard pressed to find a militant sect of Judiasm that was waging terrorist warfare against Germans in the 1920's and 1930's. You're going to be harder pressed still to find a silent majority of Jews supporting such non-existent terrorism.

So basically you're saying; because I dislike a group of people that are tacitly approving of killing Americans and westerners by silence or active participation I am equal to a political party that scapegoated a religion for every social ill their nation experienced?

Go re-read your history before you make blanket statments that put your intellect in league with a jackass.

Have a nice one![/QUOTE]

You don't 'dislike' a group of anything. You have a blatant and almost offensive vendetta against the entirety of the Arab people. I'm going to call all Americans oppressive, offensive, obnoxious, demeaning and bigotted assholes because of your actions... Hell, while I'm at it, all Irish are drunks, all black people are lazy, every German wants to kill all Jews, gays and ethnic minorities and the Polish are chronically retarded.

:roll: Whoo-ray for generalizing statements! :roll:

I always thought we should call the diffent colors breeds. It works for every other animal on the planet...
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Go re-read your history before you make blanket statments that put your intellect in league with a jackass.[/QUOTE]

You called all Muslims "camel humping towel heads" and claim to be exposing the "truth" about Islam as a whole, and yet you are accusing someone else of making blanket statements?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top