[quote name='punqsux'][quote name='QuiteBitterBeing'][quote name='punqsux']to the people who bashed it in this post:
have you played it for what it is? its a pencil and paper rpg presented on the ps2 with amazing visuals. its a really fun game, and id like to know specific reasons y people dont like it, and dont say "because its not final fantasy" because it never claimed to be.[/quote]
First, the combat system was lackluster. Sure, it's not a FF, but it doesn't even come close to FF. The static shit didn't appeal to me. Each RPG has it's "own", but this one falls to the bottom. The game's presentation is just too simple. The menus just keep coming. Unlimited Saga is a flawed RPG, period.[/quote]
it never should have come close to FF, its a VERY diffrent kind of rpg, that really hasnt been attempted on consoles before.
ill agree the combat system is nothing amazing, but it works fine for what it is.
im not going to try and get things to appeal to you, you can like and dislike what you want.
i thought the presentation was great, and the menus come up because its a pen+paper style role player, and thats just how it works. thats like saying "megaman is a good game except that he has to make all those jumps"
i dont think its flawed at all. its not perfect, but a flawed game imo means its unplayable (tomb raider:aod, summer heat beach volleyball)[/quote]
When I say "Sure, it's not a FF, but it doesn't even come close to FF" I'm speaking in terms of quality. Flawed IMO is a game not worth playing.