Explain the relevance of the party affiliation of KKK members from 49+ years ago to the modern iteration of the two main political parties. After you do that, explain which of the two parties more closely represents the ideology of the KKK today. Then, if you can get through a couple of sentences without veering off into insults and goalpost-shifting, tie it all back to see if your critique of the Democratic Party from 50+ years ago is fair to apply to the modern-day Democratic Party. I'll even give you bonus points for addressing the Southern Strategy(I know you won't though).Disingenuous? Other people in this thread (not you) were talking about race.
tl;dr(cause I know you didn't): How is your point about the membership of the Democratic Party from 50+ years ago not disingenuous when you're heavily implying that they're the exact same way today?
I'm addressing YOUR points; not someone else's. All you've done in this thread is make insults and use "liberal" as a pejorative descriptor. Maybe you should read your own goddamn posts before slinging around insults and making strawman arguments.Go back to page one. Perhaps you need to get some of that "reading comprehension"? You reacted without thinking. Must be a HUGE chip on your shoulder. Typical liberal behavior though. Be proud.
And in case my initial couple posts were going over your head(although it seems like all of them are and I bet this one will too despite spelling everything out), I was satirizing your posts until you decided to jump off the deep end with you comment about the Democratic Party from 50 years ago.
You're probably just trolling this thread anyways, so I'm out unless you provide anything of substance.
Last edited by a moderator: