1. Walmart is trying to build a business for used products. The more they have the better for them.
2. Other stores allow multiple trades, if Walmart limits it to one than they are losing. They need to match or be better than other stores.
3. A bunch of people trading in 1 copy per game isn't much better. Either way TIV's will drop due to so many people trading in the same game. Be quick about trades and that won't happen to you.
4. Just as buying a game for dirt cheap is a deal, so is trading in games. You don't think getting a new release game for half off is disgusting, so why should trading in games be any different. Both is a way to save / make money.
5. The program will not die just b/c people trade in games. Walmart expects this and wants it to happen. They can lose some money on these deals cause in the long run they will have an overstock of cheap used games that will eventually (let's hope not) ruin any other stores used game sales.
2. I feel as though they should have started with 1 copy, then based on feedback and success of the program, bump it up accordingly. Their primary business isn't buying and reselling electronics - all they want to do is horn in on Best Buy, Amazon and Gamestop's territory. As long as WM gets a piece of the trade-in pie, WM is content. And hey, if Gamestop or Best Buy were to be impacted negatively in some way (read: Gamestop shuts down lol), that's even moar win.
3. People trading in 1 copy keeps the value floating. If 100 people traded in 1 copy of GoW, the value would hold. If 100 people traded in...5+ copies each of GoW, the value would plummet. It would be a red flag, and the supply/demand would fluctuate so that supply is way more than the demand. Granted, the sample size is way bigger than 100 people, but my statement still stands.
I'm not sure how WM came up with the prices for NNK and GoW, but it would have been sad if it was the result from a group of "experts."
I hear sirens, the morality police have arrived. Or as I like to call them the sour pusses...
People really don't see anything wrong with trading in 5+ copies at a time? Especially if their only logic is "Wal-mart deserves this" or "Wal-mart can handle this loss?"
They should just beat BB and go for 4 copies of the same game, of the same system, in a one-year period or whatever it is now. Walmart wins through and through.