[quote name='bmulligan']So if Jessee Jackson had said the exact same thing, would it have been considered racist?
Isn't being "behaving in a subservient manner to White American" corporate interests the reason you people hate capitalism and politicians in the first place?
The pejorative nature of the term "uncle tom" is fundamentally different than calling a black person a $$$$er. It's a traitorous labeling of a betrayal to one's own group, not directed at someone because he is a member of the group. The racism in the comment wasn't the "Uncle Tom" label, it's the notion that because he is black, he is obligated to represent african-americans' interests before the interests of the american people. Or, in this case, the interests of the american people who elected him and the corporations that run politics.
I don't think Nader intended it as a pejorative but, the bandwagon has already been filled with group-thinkers, and we all know the brakes on that train don't work.[/QUOTE]
I was mostly with you until the last point. The idea that "intent" is necessary for racism to be the case is simply incorrect. I'm sure Food Lion was full of good intentions when they had a month-long sale on watermelon and fried chicken in celebration of black history month so many years ago, but good intentions don't immediately mean "free from racist scrutiny."
But good on ya for discerning b/w Uncle Tom and $$$$er. I didn't think you had that kind of intellectual capacity.