We are so boned

Ikohn4ever

CAGiversary!
Feedback
5 (100%)
GAO Slams Bush on Terrorism - Says Al Qaeda Attack Likely and We Have No Plan

Here is the title of a report from the Government Accountability Office on combating terrorism released today:
The United States Lacks a Comprehensive Plan to Destroy the Terrorist Threat and Close the Safe Haven in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas.
That is not some line buried in the report. That is the title. Wow.
This GAO report may be the most damning condemnation of the Bush administration's counter-terrorism efforts. The report goes on to say that the Bush administration has failed to develop any plan to address the Al Qaeda threat. Worse, the report finds that Al Qaeda is now able to attack the United States and represents the "most serious" threat to this country.
The report's opinion of the Bush administration efforts speaks for itself:
The United States has not met its national security goals to destroy the terrorist threat and close the safe haven in Pakistan...
Not only have we not met our goals but we have no plan to meet our goals:
No comprehensive plan for meeting U.S. national security goals in the FATA has been developed, as stipulated by the National Strategy for Combating Terrorism (2003), called for by an independent commission (2004), and mandated by congressional legislation (2007). Furthermore, Congress created the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) in 2004 specifically to develop comprehensive plans to combat terrorism. However, neither the National Security Council (NSC), NCTC, nor other executive branch departments have developed a comprehensive plan that includes all elements of national power--diplomatic, military, intelligence, development assistance, economic, and law enforcement support--called for by the various national security strategies and Congress.
Al Qaeda can now attack the United States:
"we found broad agreement, as documented in the unclassified 2007 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), State and embassy documents, as well as among Defense, State, and other officials, including those operating in Pakistan, that al Qaeda had regenerated its ability to attack the United States and had succeeded in establishing a safe haven in Pakistan"
Al Qaeda in Pakistan is the most serious threat:
al Qaeda's central leadership, based in the border area of Pakistan, is and will remain the most serious terrorist threat to the United States... al Qaeda is now using the Pakistani safe haven to put the last element necessary to launch another attack against America into place...
Al Qaeda is using the Pakistan tribal areas to put the finishing touches on its plans to attack the United States. A DNI assessment from earlier in 2008 reports troubling findings:
al Qaeda is now using the Pakistani safe haven to put the last element necessary to launch another attack against America into place, including the identification, training, and positioning of Western operatives for an attack. It stated that al Qaeda is most likely using the FATA to plot terrorist attacks against political, economic, and infrastructure targets in America "designed to produce mass casualties, visually dramatic destruction, significant economic aftershocks, and/or fear among the population."
It is really not a good thing to have incompetent people running this country.










all the money and lives for nothing
 
Frankly, I don't think you need to be a national security expert to know we're going to get hit again eventually. As evidenced by the large number of people who believe that George Bush is doing a good job keeping us safe because we haven't been hit again (and those same people should be quite grateful to me too, because I personally keep every American from being killed by falling meteorites), we've prioritized the appearance of security over genuine security every step of the way since 9/11.
 
I believe John DiIulio was the first person to use the phrase "Mayberry Machiavellians" in regard to this administration. How right he was.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']I believe John DiIulio was the first person to use the phrase "Mayberry Machiavellians" in regard to this administration. How right he was.[/quote]

Oh yeah I totally agree, b/c who wouldn't know who John DiIulio is and what he meant by "Mayberry machiavellians" right?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DiIulio

Now, full disclosure, I probably wouldn't know his name if I weren't familiar with his criminological research beforehand.

But, if you know what "Mayberry" refers to (I suspect most Americans do), and also what is meant when one is described as "Machiavellian," then you can put two and two together, can't you?
 
[quote name='mykevermin']http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DiIulio

Now, full disclosure, I probably wouldn't know his name if I weren't familiar with his criminological research beforehand.

But, if you know what "Mayberry" refers to (I suspect most Americans do), and also what is meant when one is described as "Machiavellian," then you can put two and two together, can't you?[/quote]

Isn't Mayberry from Green Acres? A show that even with my 26 years was barely around even when I was a toddler, so I doubt many CAGs know it. I could be wrong about what show it is from though.

A green acres location where ends justify the means?
A green acres location where it is better to be feared than loved?

I've studied Machiavelli in The Prince and still have no idea what you're getting at.

EDIT: Oh, the Andy Griffith show. Okay, it's slightly less outdated. Now I get it; yep, it's clever and accurate to the Idiot Son of an Asshole and his cronies.
 
Worst case scenario: We'll lose another part of the Bill of Rights. There are still 8 of the original 10 left.

The terrorists still don't have nuclear weapons unless the terrorists' suppliers have gotten really stupid.

Stay away from San Francisco this fall and you'll be fine.
 
I've never watched teh Andy Griffith show. And Sofa, I live in one of those types of areas too, yet we ought to still care, even though it may not affect us directly.
 
Of course we'll get hit again, duh. And it will be a doozy, likely.

How else is the government going to gain more control except through an afraid populace asking for it's help? Whether it be famine or terrorist attacks, it won't matter.

Watch what happens between August and November carefully. You heard it here first :).

It will be amusing, as always, to watch the partisan finger pointing after the next attack.
 
[quote name='pittpizza']Looks like Big Brother is doing a good job keeping people like Thrustbucket afraid...lol, suckers.[/QUOTE]

Wow, you are quickly rising up there to the ranks of Msut77 as far as meaningless posts based on complete misunderstandings....

Where did I insinuate I was afraid exactly? Or do you some how mix up the meanings of "amused" with "fear"?
 
bread's done
Back
Top