[quote name='blandstalker']Okay, I had my say about E.T. already. Raiders is a bizarre game, but I think it's really pretty neat. For a 2600 game, there were a lot of screens and a lot of different gameplay elements. It was hard, and it didn't explain itself, but you could figure it out. It had its own weird but internally consistent logic.
Of course, my friends hated it.
I still say E.T. and Raiders are playable. Here's
an excellent article on E.T. that I agree with. When you consider the 2600 games that are just unfair or broken or horrible, horrible travesties (Swordquest, Ssssssnake, Sky Skipper, Super Cobra, Laser Blast, Space Jockey), it's unfair to put E.T. or Raiders anywhere in their league. Spend 5 minutes with any of these games and you'll be
begging for E.T.
And those are only the bad 2600 games I "played". There were many more, especially right around the crash, that were far, far worse.[/QUOTE]
I always tried Raiders as a kid and couldn't figure it out, maybe I should try it again with an emulator.
What was wrong with Space Jockey? I loved that game with my Atari and don't remember any big problems with it.
I am with you about ET. I got it when it came out and beat it a few times. Sure it is boring in hindsight but not really better or worse than many things that were out during the time. Christ, most Atari games couldn't be beat and ET could so that has to at least say something.