Which tv should i buy?

Get the Samsung. The response time on that LG is 8ms, which sucks. The Samsung is still 6ms, which doesn't seem like a huge difference, but 8ms is just intolerable, I'd say.
 
[quote name='CoffeeEdge']Get the Samsung. The response time on that LG is 8ms, which sucks. The Samsung is still 6ms, which doesn't seem like a huge difference, but 8ms is just intolerable, I'd say.[/quote]

Agreed.

I've always been a Samsung owner so I'm a little bias. But, I've never had a problem with my Samsung... I just love em.

Although I am a 71f owner... fuck'n TBE. :roll:

Why does the LG say "Ultrafast 5 ms response time
Creates smooth transitions between fast action scenes for fluid movement."
Click to expand...
Haha.
Cause it impresses old people.
 
I was going to buy that Samsung myself back in October but I went with a Panasonic instead.
So I say Samsung between those two.
 
[quote name='crushtopher']Why does the LG say "Ultrafast 5 ms response time
Creates smooth transitions between fast action scenes for fluid movement."[/QUOTE]

Best Buy are lying donkey boners.

Horse's mouth says 8ms:
http://us.lge.com/products/model/detail/tv|audio|video_lcd flat panel__32LG30.jhtml

[quote name='DarkNessBear']I've always been a Samsung owner so I'm a little bias. But, I've never had a problem with my Samsung... I just love em.[/QUOTE]

Well, I'm not biased. I'm going by pure specs here.
 
[quote name='Magehart']Samsung for LCD's; Pannys for Plasmas. Outside of that you're just trying to compromise.[/QUOTE]

Brand hiveminding is stupid.
 
[quote name='CoffeeEdge']Brand hiveminding is stupid.[/quote]

Perhaps. But for middle class TV's those two are the best in their respective categories.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top