[quote name='epobirs'][quote name='mykevermin'][quote name='epobirs']The men I described made it in the world on the basis of their ability. They have no patience for other blacks who believe it isn't possible and that greatly reduces their dating pool where black women are concerned. It isn't as though the average white woman was a good match either. These were guys whose work was a major part of their lives and not just a job. Their prospective mates needed to be able to appreciate that work, so dating amongst colleagues and other high achiever groups helped a lot.[/b][/quote]
So, in other words, they wouldn't be seeking spouses at all? If neither black nor white women are suitable spouses, what in the world is your argument?
By the way, you believe that we must live in a meritocracy!
myke.[/quote]
Work harder on the reading comprehension or the cap and gown will be revoked. They obviously did seek mates but as indicated limited their search to women in fields that required similar levels of achievement to their own. That narrowed the field quite a lot but as also indicated the results were favorable.
No meritocracy here. The Man has been holding me back all these years. Wily bugger somehow tricked me into making all those mistakes and bad choices. You betcha.[/quote]
Someone gets snippy late at night, don't they? I'll do my best to avoid anything childish (which, for me, is going to be rather difficult).
So your sarcastic remarks further reaffirm that we live in a nation/culture/whathaveyou that is defined by meritocratic acheivement. You genuinely believe that people reflect their work ethic, intelligence, education, and upbringing (to what extent you believe this holds true, I can't claim). That's fine, most US citizens believe that if people "put their mind to it, they can do anything."
However, your argument puts the proportion of black females into a set of classes that largely excludes them from the "intellectual classes," for want of a better phrase. As a result, those black males in the upper echelon of work status in the United States have, without any involvement of their own, a severe constraint against finding a black female as a suitable spouse (the value the male places on status, and the relative lack of females who fulfill the qualifications that come with that), without any involvement of the male.
Why is it that black females are underrepresented in these areas, then? We should expect, if meritocracy rules *truly* hold, a perfectly even distribution of people in various socioeconomic classes according to their proportion in the overall population; if blacks are 12-15% of the population, they should occupy (by virtue of random assignment) 12-15% of any given identifiable "class."
So how do we explain this discrepancy? (and by we, I mean "not me").
myke.