Would you support a ban of the face veil in the United States?

rabbitt

CAGiversary!
Feedback
7 (100%)
The place of Muslim garb in the US is a discussion I haven't seen enough of. There's a few too many things being kept off the table (regarding religion, and, especially Islam), but eventually we will have to come into contact with them.

The topic is, would you support a ban of the veil or burqa in the United States?
 
I don't remember one. If somebody can drudge one up, I suppose we can close this, but the closest topic I can remember is a discussion of the ban in France.
 
[quote name='Rex_Banner']Yes.

You're in america now, you have rights as a human being. Take the shit of your face.[/QUOTE]
Respecting other cultures, fuck yeah!
 
[quote name='rabbitt']I don't remember one. If somebody can drudge one up, I suppose we can close this, but the closest topic I can remember is a discussion of the ban in France.[/QUOTE]

Well that was probably it.

[quote name='Rex_Banner']Yes.

You're in america now, you have rights as a human being. Take the shit of your face.[/QUOTE]

Damn, you're some kind of posterboy for doublethink aren't you?
 
[quote name='fullmetalfan720']Respecting other cultures, fuck yeah![/QUOTE]

culture =/= religion

Watch out for this one, folks. It's easy to be tricked.
 
[quote name='SpazX']



Damn, you're some kind of posterboy for doublethink aren't you?[/QUOTE]

Explain how what I posted is double think.
 
[quote name='Rex_Banner']Explain how what I posted is double think.[/QUOTE]

You're in America, you have rights, so stop doing that, you're not allowed.
 
[quote name='SpazX']You're in America, you have rights, so stop doing that, you're not allowed.[/QUOTE]

Exactly, however, never quoted that last part.
 
[quote name='Rex_Banner']Exactly, however, never quoted that last part.[/QUOTE]

English is not your first language, right?
 
[quote name='SpazX']English is not your first language, right?[/QUOTE]

DEEEERR NO!! LULZ DIZZ GUI ISZnT l33t lik3 m3. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
[quote name='Jesus_S_Preston']I'd support a ban of anyone with an avatar.[/QUOTE]

I'd support a ban of anyone on the CAGcast
 
Is this thread now irony?

[quote name='whoknows']I'd support a ban of anyone on the CAGcast[/QUOTE]

I'd support a ban of anyone who has ever jacked off wearing condoms.
 
[quote name='rabbitt']I wonder if there's a chance of having an actual discussion.[/QUOTE]


JimVarney3.jpg
 
[quote name='Jesus_S_Preston'] I'd support a ban of anyone who has ever jacked off wearing condoms.[/QUOTE]


[quote name='rabbitt']I wonder if there's a chance of having an actual discussion.[/QUOTE]

I'd support a ban of anyone going off topic
 
[quote name='whoknows']I'd support a ban of anyone going off topic[/QUOTE]

I'd support a ban of anyone going on topic.

And godzilla
 
1) Is it a cultural or religious thing? 'Cuz I dunno which it is.

2) If it's not harmful or provoking, why would we ban it?

3) Are yemulkes (sic) cultural or religious? And depending on the answer, are they only considered different from face veils because there's no negative connotation about them?

4) purple monkey dishwasher
 
[quote name='rabbitt']culture =/= religion

Watch out for this one, folks. It's easy to be tricked.[/QUOTE]

The practice existed before the founding of Islam. It's not part of their religion, but rather their culture.
 
This may sound hypocritical but I would say in public use no. When it comes to ID's etc, Id say they have to show their face. If pulled over wearing one, show your face and ID etc and its all good.
 
[quote name='fullmetalfan720']The practice existed before the founding of Islam. It's not part of their religion, but rather their culture.[/QUOTE]

The practice was adopted into Islam and is now a part of the religion, wherever it was originated. Further, covering the entire face isn't explicitly demanded in the Qur'an. Covering the hands and face is considered an extreme interpretation of Islam, even by most Muslim standards.

Certainly banning the face veil wouldn't be offending any specific culture outside of the Byzantine Empire. And, as most Muslims don't hold it necessary, indeed, consider it 'overkill' of sorts, banning the face veil would only be stifling the most extreme interpretations of the Qur'an and Hadith, which I think is a goal of secular society.
 
[quote name='rabbitt']The practice was adopted into Islam and is now a part of the religion, wherever it was originated. Further, covering the entire face isn't explicitly demanded in the Qur'an. Covering the hands and face is considered an extreme interpretation of Islam, even by most Muslim standards.

Certainly banning the face veil wouldn't be offending any specific culture outside of the Byzantine Empire. And, as most Muslims don't hold it necessary, indeed, consider it 'overkill' of sorts, banning the face veil would only be stifling the most extreme interpretations of the Qur'an and Hadith, which I think is a goal of secular society.[/QUOTE]

I tend to see it as a cultural thing, because as you said it isn't in the Qur'an, and it is only practiced in certain areas, in the Middle East.

It is hardly ever worn in the US, so what is the point in banning it? Also, where in the Constitution it allows for regulating dress? Unless you are going to ban it at a local level by making it qualify as "indecent" dress, I don't see how it would be constitutional to ban it. Even then, who does it really harm, if a woman is wearing it?
 
Also, considering so many that champion "Seperation of Church and State", how would banning a religious dress code that harms no one not conflict with the First Amendment?
 
No, they can wear their sexy outfits...Cobra Commander wills it.
 
I'll take the libertarian side on this one. Let them wear it. It doesn't harm me or anyone else. If someone wants to wear underwear on their head, let them. But I also have the right to make fun of them in public.
 
[quote name='rabbitt']The practice was adopted into Islam and is now a part of the religion, wherever it was originated. Further, covering the entire face isn't explicitly demanded in the Qur'an. Covering the hands and face is considered an extreme interpretation of Islam, even by most Muslim standards.

Certainly banning the face veil wouldn't be offending any specific culture outside of the Byzantine Empire. And, as most Muslims don't hold it necessary, indeed, consider it 'overkill' of sorts, banning the face veil would only be stifling the most extreme interpretations of the Qur'an and Hadith, which I think is a goal of secular society.[/QUOTE]

I think they should ban the head scarf, and nuns have to wear bikinis.

Rabbitt, I know you mean well dude, but your interpretation of Islamic interpretation is probably unneccessary. It's not considered "extreme" by muslims at all. I've heard both views defended with good evidence...by very intelligent muslims. My personal stance based on the evidence and discussions is that it's not required and is optional. If a woman feels better wearing it, makes her feel more devout, that's great. Since no other religious or cultural dress is banned in the US, then this one shouldn't be either.

(and something that is constantly misunderstood on these boards is that there is Islamic (religious) culture. There is also regional culture, but much like the Jews being both an ethnic group and a religious group, Islam is a way of life, and a religion. There is a preferred way to do darn near everything in Islam.)
 
[quote name='fullmetalfan720']I tend to see it as a cultural thing, because as you said it isn't in the Qur'an, and it is only practiced in certain areas, in the Middle East.

It is hardly ever worn in the US, so what is the point in banning it? Also, where in the Constitution it allows for regulating dress? Unless you are going to ban it at a local level by making it qualify as "indecent" dress, I don't see how it would be constitutional to ban it. Even then, who does it really harm, if a woman is wearing it?[/QUOTE]

The full face veil can't be a cultural thing if only the most 'devout' Muslim women 'choose' to wear it. And a note on their 'choice,' while we're at it. It can hardly be considered a choice by Muslim woman, among so much that is not up to them, when they are bullied by their male peers and imams, in some cases threatened with acid to the face. It's an ironic and dismissive insinuation to say that they have choice in their garb in a religion dominated by masochistic beliefs.

On that note, your last sentence comes off a bit more masochistic than I think you intended it to be, but is precisely in line with how Islam views the situation and the point I was trying to make. Notice that only half of the population is mandated to cover itself up under Islam. It would be facile at this point to say that their track record with women's rights is deplorable at best.

Anyone with a concealed face poses a threat to public safety. There are signs in front of banks and other institutions clearly stating that anyone wearing a mask or otherwise obstructing a full view of their face is in line to cause a public disturbance. It would only take minutes for me to be kicked out of any building if I came in wearing a mask.

Aside from (but in addition to) all of this, don't I at least have the right to see the face of everyone I come into contact with?
 
[quote name='rabbitt']The full face veil can't be a cultural thing if only the most 'devout' Muslim women 'choose' to wear it. And a note on their 'choice,' while we're at it. It can hardly be considered a choice by Muslim woman, among so much that is not up to them, when they are bullied by their male peers and imams, in some cases threatened with acid to the face. It's an ironic and dismissive insinuation to say that they have choice in their garb in a religion dominated by masochistic beliefs.

On that note, your last sentence comes off a bit more masochistic than I think you intended it to be, but is precisely in line with how Islam views the situation and the point I was trying to make. Notice that only half of the population is mandated to cover itself up under Islam. It would be facile at this point to say that their track record with women's rights is deplorable at best.

Anyone with a concealed face poses a threat to public safety. There are signs in front of banks and other institutions clearly stating that anyone wearing a mask or otherwise obstructing a full view of their face is in line to cause a public disturbance. It would only take minutes for me to be kicked out of any building if I came in wearing a mask.

Aside from (but in addition to) all of this, don't I at least have the right to see the face of everyone I come into contact with?[/QUOTE]

OK, I get it, I get it. You don't know crap about Islam but want to have an opinion on it. That's fine. Just don't paint yourself as an expert or like you've spent time researching it.

The acid throwing abaya crap that went on in Afghanistan was condemned by the international muslim community. Nobody sane condones that. Believe it or not, in Islam, women have choices just like men do. Men are required to cover from the naval to the knees, and it's optional, to cover even more (like the loose fitting robes and head coverings many wear). If a muslim woman wants to wear a bikini and walk down the street in the US, she can. Just as she can wear an abaya.

Are nuns oppressed? Priests aren't required to wear the same headcovering? No, nuns are highly regarded and shown great levels of respect for choosing that type of modesty. Why should the world tell muslim women they're oppressed for dressing the same way?

If a bank wants to put a face covering rule in, they can. That's their right, just as a place of business can say no firearms are allowed and legal gun owners, at risk of trespassing, have to obey, even though they are legally allowed to carry elsewhere. If we don't like a business' practices, we can elect to take our business elsewhere.

How many domestic attacks have taken place when a band of assumed muslim women turned out to be crazy male bank robbers who were on a crime spree? Should I be scared that an elephant will break into my house and bludgeon me to death in my sleep? It's never happened before, but it might. That's a national security risk.

And I said if it makes the woman feel more devout, than good for her. I did not say it's a measure of ones' faith. I've known some scum of the earth people that have dressed in full "Islamic" clothing. The clothes don't make you a good person or a bad person. Some of the best women I've met have either not covered at all, or covered only their hair and neck.

And I'll close with personal experience. I spent some time in Saudi a few years back. You know, Wahabi (you must get a hardon every time you hear this buzzword) Land. This is the country where all women are oppressed. The posterchild country for hating women and forcing them to cover. In Mecca, the Great Mosque, the holiest site in all of Islam, women walk around with faces exposed, faces covered, loose head scarves that show their hair, and tight ones that cover it all. The woman's choice is respected at the holiest site on the planet for muslims. If it's not respected elsewhere, that's on those individuals, not the faith.

So keep telling me about what it's like to be muslim, or a muslim woman. You've got tons of credibility so far.
 
[quote name='rabbitt']Aside from (but in addition to) all of this, don't I at least have the right to see the face of everyone I come into contact with?[/QUOTE]

No.
 
No, in fact if I see one more gangsta with his shorts around his knees and his ass exposed I may starts wearing a veil just to keep from seeing it.
 
Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism.
 
[quote name='javeryh']Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism.[/QUOTE]

I love your sarcasm.
 
Only if I can ban people from wearing anything with a cross, Jesus, or any other religious icons/symbology/phrases on it, or having any of said things attached to their person/property in any way.
 
No I wouldnt support it because its stupid. Its a piece of clothing and part of their customs and heritage, there is nothing wrong with it. Im irish, that would be like saying I couldnt wear a kilt (not that I ever have) out places.

Now, I would support it in like the workplace. Ive seen news stories of like the police officer that was suing the police dept he got suspended from because he refused to take off his turban or something or another while on duty and thats just pure bullcrap. When your working and wearing a uniform or something like that then that stuff doesnt belong because your being paid to dress how your employer decides is accetable. Or removal of such items in high security areas also is acceptable.





[quote name='Rex_Banner']Yes.

You're in america now, you have rights as a human being. Take the shit of your face.[/QUOTE]

Banned! Thank fucking god.
 
As a non-american, I would like to offer an opinion that will most likely be rejected because we're just jolly old Canadians and I'm probably a tool. I think to demand to cover your face in a public place in an era where so many people are afraid of the threat of terrorism is maybe just a little ridiculous. People are paranoid enough already, I'm a visual minority(My folks are Indian immigrants) and with a very foreign name, I get a lot of shit. I don't wear a turban, don't dress in traditional attire but that doesn't stop anything.

Just my two cents.
 
But covering your face in public isn't really a safety risk. Sure, harder to identify if they rob a store etc., so I do get that angle.

But public places really have no security--especially in the US were hand guns are so prevalent.

No one is saying they shouldn't be removed when going through security checks in secured location. But no reason to ban them in open public. If there's some rash of people in face veils robbing banks etc., then we can revisit the topic I suppose.
 
[quote name='punklivz']what about if she had a veil and was breastfeeding in public OMG! lol jk.[/QUOTE]

Being that this is my personal fetish and the basis for the website I run - veiledandcrazykids.com - I would not be opposed. Girlsgoneveiled.com is my other site, but that's really more of a strictly higher class kind of voyeurism, for those with more discerning tastes.
 
bread's done
Back
Top