[quote name='alonzomourning23']If nothing else, his fame makes him a better choice than rush limbaugh[/QUOTE]
Well, I'm disgusted that either person is on there (although seeing "Fat Rush" made me giggle - I can't wait 'till someone screams 'liberal media' at whomever posted a picture of him from his fatty days

).
However, I will concede that nobody listened to AM radio until Rush came around (except for when your grandparents were children, and families gathered 'round the radio to listen to
War of the Worlds or somesuch). He did do something notable. Shame he's still alive, since people are remembered more fondly posthumously (see Paul II, John).
Michael Moore? While he's okay (don't tell me that
Roger & Me wasn't a fantastic film and didn't wrench your heart), I'd argue that the only thing he's really done is made it okay to be a "liberal" in today's mainstream political dialogue. Who defended them before Michael did? With that out of the way, he's done little since then, other than become a left version of Rush Limbaugh (an overweight white male telling the nation that they have all the answers and know all the questions, yet offering little more than polemic and ad hominems, whilst taking in millions of dollars to perpetuate the cycle of inequality; the only difference between the two is which side is getting

ed). Both are guilty of diluting the intellectual purity of our political dialogue, and should be ashamed of themselves for doing just that.
myke.
...why hasn't anyone suggested Adam Smith yet? I sure as hell won't, but I figured someone (PAD) might.