[quote name='"Valkryst"']LoL great replies.
If it the site (
http://retail.microsoft.com/retail/xboxoffer/ ) was built where you have to
pass the disclaimer stating the policy, then you'd be correct.
It doesn't.
You were given a link by another that puts onto the public internet a link not meant for public consumption. You are not allowed to gain illicit benefit from misdeeds of others. There is a link to the Master terms of service there, and such cases are
A direct link will let you order a product for a given price.
Which you must fraudulently state a position at a retailer to get. Your legal footing is EXTREMELY TENOUS, as you must rely on at least one act of misrepresentation, and that is after having been given a link not intented for public consumption.
That is a
legally binding contract with no disclaimer therefore
microsoft is required
by federal law to honor it.
Microsoft has full latitude over everything on its site. You should read the disclaimers on thier site. Thanks to the wording, they have full latitude over just about everything they offer. By the way, a legal binding contract cannot be made if one of the parties is involved in fraud or misrepresentation to gain access to said contract. I'd love to see anyone argue that Microsoft must honor this when the person fraudulently states a connection to an authorized retailer to gain access to the order form.
I can scan the business law pages on contracts if you'd like, I still have the textbook from last qtr.
Try reading the rules and regs. on Microsofts page first. Your arguing a losing proposition.
Edit:
If ms had displayed the disclaimer during the order I would have recognized it.
To get to the order you must pass a dropdown asking for an affilated retailer. You commited an act of fraud to even get to the order form. Anything accessed after that put you on no better footing than if you were a hacker.
As of now, their policy has a flaw, which is why my order shipped out a couple days ago.
BTW that legal link is a link to microsoft's entire legal section, not the retail section.
Every policy listed under that link does NOT apply to the retail site.
That is the Master Terms of Service link. IT APPLIES TO EVERYTHING ON THE MICROSOFT.COM DOMAIN.
A vendor must display any valid limitations or disclaimers before allowing the purchase of a limited product.
They do. But you just used an unauthorized link to gain access and then use fraud to circumvent the system which is used to authenticate the people who are allowed to partake in said deal.
period.
Nope. I'd love to see you go argue that. It's in the normal site flow, and to gain access to the site in the intended manner you must LOG IN and pass throw the retail homepage to reach that site. Just because Microsoft has a hole in it's security doesn't give you the right to reap illlict gains from it.
***************************
The obvious fix would be to only allow registered & verified users to purchase the product.
Thus making a secure site where a direct link wouldn't function.
atm: ANYONE CAN ACCESS IT making the site PUBLIC.
Current Internet laws state if anyone can access a site, it is considered public.
You still must commit an act of fraud or misrepresentation to gain access to the order form.
***************************
So we have a public site offering a product with no disclaimer of limitations.
Your wrong. The rules set forth by the master terms of use and the retail site's terms of use sit apply. You agree to a defacto acceptance of these terms to even use thier site.
It is valid, it is legal, and microsoft will eventually fix it.
Wrong. You still can't weasel around the act of misrepresentation and/or fraud.