[quote name='ssjmichael']I have no idea why you're using that smiley and saying "and yet". Did you read what I said? Of course you can still can activate 5 systems, that's why the feature is there for. [/QUOTE]
Because I think it is hypocritical on their part to get the OP crap about it when it blatantly STILL SAYS you can share it with 5 systems, if they don't want you too do it that disclaimer should be completely removed to leave no doubt that they do not condone people doing that. Period.
And I thought after how the CS rep treated the OP, it was stupid for their reaction and how the welcome back games say something completely different (hence the sarcastic eye roll smiley).
That does not, in any way, imply that it's there for gamesharing. It's simply so people with more than one PS3 can have the content on all their systems.
This has never been said in any offical statement from any top member of SCEA/SCEE/SCEI. (unless you have seen otherwise)
And yet WHY??? (is there no official word...)
Because of the reasons we've already mentioned because it would cost them money, money they don't want to loose because of lost sales. End of story.
If sony really wanted to kill gamesharing, or reduce it, they could limit the number of machines to 2 or 3.
Exactly.
But I dunno what we're arguing here, I just thought it was silly of them to tell OP one thing then blatantly have another policy elsewhere saying the complete opposite, total hypocrisy by Sony with that.
So until Kaz Hirai, Jack Tretton or Howard Stringer come back and officially denounce and refute what Tretton said a few years ago, I consider it a non-issue, I just find it mildly amusing that corporate policy is to hand slap people for doing it, plus play bad cop when people are suppose to have the EULA memorized when and if they violate it, when probably a very large amount of users gamershare. Hence...
And thanks for the info, Mr. Burnzz, I have an account on a buddies system I've not talked to in years and its nice to know in case I need to null it.