ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Ndolger']You're overthinking this. Why do you assume these people knew "anything" about the stacking? [/QUOTE]

I don't assume it. But Hal said that the reason for the exploit was stackers. See what the problem is?


[quote name='Ndolger']

4) *thinks hard* Hey, well I have this free sign up code...I'll just cancel my account, open up a new one, and get another 10% off! To a normal guy 10% off is incentive enough to do this relatively simple task of opening up a new account (not every person is a CAG; 10% would be incentive enough to average gamer to do this; forget about 20-30%)
[/quote]

Except that without stacking, you wouldn't need 2 codes. Your 10% off code applied to your whole cart, not just one item. So even if you make the mistake of not knowing that once, would you do it over and over and over again like Hal asserts? And really, how many games are you gonna buy from Amazon day after day after day one at a time? Because that's the only reason why you would do that if you weren't stacking. But of course, remember, Hal said it was stacking that ruined the fun.

Even if you ignore all that, let's suppose you're a dude who wants another code. Just to get another 10% off. You're stockpiling codes for the future. What is easier? Using another email account or calling 5 times to cancel and rejoin? Who doesn't have more than 1 email account? And since the ECA never checked against your address, it wasn't like they wouldn't give you an account. You could sign up 20x under Bob A Smith, Bob B Smith and nobody would notice. Again, even if it's a reason to join, it wasn't a reason to cancel. The whole crux of their argument isn't people joined multiple times, it's people cancelled multiple times.

[quote name='Ndolger']
If you read the latest article, there is strong evidence to suggest that 2) is the more plausible scenario. Keep it simple...this organization has been around for a few years. I find it incredibly improbable that they just decided one day..."OK, let's try and make some money".

And seriously if you think about it...$20 PER YEAR (max) per member is nothing. Somebody made a post about what their operating costs are. This revenue is pennies. There's no way they signed up more than a few thousand members.[/QUOTE]

First, it's not an article, it's a press release. And second, you're probably right. Like I said, I am more inclined to believe it's incompetence and arrogance instead of an outright scam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not arguing here, just discussing and asking, but didn't the free ones need your credit card? I thought they did, and I'd assumed by that (because I was a paying member from July) that they'd "check off" each CC used so it couldn't be used again? I must be wrong some how though, if people WERE creating like 5 accounts. I thought the duality of the CC requirement wasn't just so they could bill you after your free year for your first real year, but also to track and tag a person to prevent multiple free accounts. Maybe that's wrong.

Also, just my impression, and I can go reread the "interview" for a third time, but was Hal, and his horrid writing skills, actually referring to two groups of "exploiters"...?? One that was stacking, and one that was canceling and rejoining and canceling etc...so, two groups, committing separate "acts" that he just lumped in as exploiters? I have to go reread how he referred to both, as both were in his newest release, but since he talked about both, I assumed they were two groups of people, with some overlap in commission of "crime" or what-have you...

Ehh...the ECA reaps what they sow....

Edit: well, here is what I was thinking of, but I don't know how to interpret Hal's statements with the spin anymore:

We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.

and then here:

Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay.

Okay, well, I sort of answered my own question. He's calling or referring to all the "users" or members with the tone of "exploiters" and such...and since there were two groups that "did dirty things" in his eyes, I wasn't sure how or if he lumped them together or held them in separate entities/groups... But then I found this part, which from what I'm told here (because I didn't know about the stacking until after the codes were gone) is TOTALLY false, and Hal's lying through his teeth on the possibility of doing this:

Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='BWS1982']Not arguing here, just discussing and asking, but didn't the free ones need your credit card? I thought they did, and I'd assumed by that (because I was a paying member from July) that they'd "check off" each CC used so it couldn't be used again? I must be wrong some how though, if people WERE creating like 5 accounts.[/QUOTE]
People could use a new card. A fake card. If there's no charge, it probably isn't checked right away.
 
I think to get to the heart of this whole controversy, it boils down to creating a time line from the following points:

1) The date when the Amazon codes last ran out (I'm sure we have a forum record of that here)

2) The date Amazon told ECA there would be no more codes (Surely there is an email record of this officially from the ECA's side - I'm sure there's old forum posts about it here)

3) The date when the "cancel auto-renewal" button was discovered by the ECA (They should have an email documenting this - after all, that's how they were alerted to it)

4) The date when the "cancel auto-renewal" button was removed (They should have an internal memo, or at least a work order to have the button removed)

5) The date when the TOS changed the option to cancel from a phone number to snail mail (Surely they have an internal memo and a letter to their legal counsel asking for an update on the TOS)

I think those simple questions can clarify this whole mess without getting into how or why the Amazon codes were abused or never came back.

The premise is this:
If numbers 3-5 have dates long after numbers 1-2, then clearly it would indicate there are bigger issues here, like these procedures were not undertaken to control abusive members.

If the dates are shortly after the Amazon codes ran out and weren't coming back, then it looks like a response to an actual issue of abuse.

Seems simple enough, right?

Because conceivably people might have been trying to register multiple accounts in the hopes the codes would come back or something (regardless of if that would work), but after we were told "no more codes" then surely the claim of "register-cancel-register-cancel" had to almost completely stop, right?

So I think if we can just get the information to string those dates together, we can see if this was an actual response to a problem, or if the ECA has twisted what was an unrelated problem to cover their own asses.

Agree?
 
True.

Above, I edited into it to show you what I'm talking about. The first and second quotes show how he refers to two acts with potentially two separate "crimes" (as he seems to speak), and then lumps them together in the third quote, into an act that wasn't possible from what is said here. Two different "exploitations" of sorts were referenced, and that had thrown me off.

I can't make heads or tails of his gibberish anymore because after being a bit more educated on how things really went down from others in this thread, I keep reading Hal's statements and reacting with "Um, no" the whole time.
 
I just tried to log into the ECA. I log in every day to see if they finally cancelled my account.

It still accepted my email address and password. But then I got the message that my username has been blocked. When I clicked to unsubscribe to the news letter- they still have all of my personal info. But they blocked me from signing in.

I wanted all of my info DELETED from their systems and my account cancelled. Instead of doing that, they just blocked/banned my username and kept all of my personal info.

UGH! I am NOT happy.
 
[quote name='Mizz Behavin']I just tried to log into the ECA. I log in every day to see if they finally cancelled my account.

It still accepted my email address and password. But then I got the message that my username has been blocked. When I clicked to unsubscribe to the news letter- they still have all of my personal info. But they blocked me from signing in.

I wanted all of my info DELETED from their systems and my account cancelled. Instead of doing that, they just blocked/banned my username and kept all of my personal info.

UGH! I am NOT happy.[/QUOTE]
Even if you did delete the information in your account, they still might keep backup records of it.
 
WTH, now there are what appear to be comments. Poorly written and thought out ones (like middle school level)...but comments are there.

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

FYI, I got back to this link because my most recent ECA newsletter had a link to it, it was worded as Hal Discussing membership complaints, so I wanted to see if it was his "interview" and it was, but now there are "comments" in it....Not all of them are right in line with ECA either, though it's hard to tell from the awful prose and grammar, so I'm curious how "those" got through....
 
Woohoo, I just checked, I'm no longer an ECA member. Looks like the affiliate list has been updated...but Maingear is still listed. Odd. Anyway, I've learned to investigate a group a little better before throwing my $20 at it.
 
[quote name='confoosious']I would think the majority of people signed up for the codes AND the movement.[/QUOTE]

I don't remember anyone talking/asking about the ECA's movement in the original ECA threads. Everything (if not everything, certainly the majority) was talk of discount codes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='chakan']Woohoo, I just checked, I'm no longer an ECA member. Looks like the affiliate list has been updated...but Maingear is still listed. Odd. Anyway, I've learned to investigate a group a little better before throwing my $20 at it.[/QUOTE]

You're free? Let's go to the strip club!
 
It was honestly a 70/30 codes/movement thing for me. I'm looking into EFF for a donation replacement.

...and let me grab my jacket, lets hit the club!
 
[quote name='trabbahabba']That's not true. I used the GIMAG promo and still had to use a card. GIMAG was a discount code, so you still had to have billing info entered.[/QUOTE]

I also had to use a CC when signing up with the GIMAG code.
 
So now I get the message: "The username bluehat9 has not been activated or is blocked."

Does this mean I'm out?
 
Maybe they're killing off the subscribers from the GIMAG code, just wiping the slate clean..then start this all over again, and a couple years from now put up another 'free' code..
 
Ok, looking at one of ECA's partner's comments on the situation is quite confusion. You can find their comments on http://blog.dawdle.com/


IF you read through it, it is really confusing. Here are a couple of things that really stand out, and make me wonder what Dwadle is doing still supporting the ECA. They call them Evil, Draconian, dont agree with their cancellation methods, dont think their technical partners are the greatest, but still support them? I have posted some very interesting excerpts below all are from the link I posted above:




"We are disappointed that the ECA requires registered snail mail to cancel an ECA membership; that's about as evil as the workout gyms that continue to charge you long after you've left."

"Let's be clear: people at the ECA will be fired because of the controversy and the resulting reduction in membership dues that decreases their budget. This is not good for gamers."

"However, that's no excuse for being draconian about membership cancellation. It doesn't mean that the ECA needs their technical partners (who, in my experience, aren't the greatest) to set up an online form, but they should be a lot better than certified mail."

"I will say that I have seen some organizations auto-increment credit card expiration dates, but it's not the standard as far as I know, and Dawdle doesn't do this either"

"However, at this time, we've decided to not drop our partnership with the ECA."





WTF? This makes no sense.
 
SUGGESTION
Everyone take their $20 for next year's ECA Membership fee and donate it to the CAG Child's Play fundraiser.
What, there was 500 + names on that list? That's an extra $10,000 for Child's Play.
 
[quote name='sadikyo']Ok - is it just me or is that GameCulture comment really...entertaining?[/QUOTE]

Very...Zippy seems to be the only long time member of the ECA that is actually able to criticize and get away with it.
Or they haven't seen the comments and deleted them yet.
Zippy posted comments on Hal's first public announcement over at the ECA forums and the message was deleted in a couple of days.

Here's the post that was deleted.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.

Here's what I think happened, you decide whether it was shady. All this is documented so someone will call me out if what I say isn't true.

- When signing up for the ECA, there was an "auto-renew" button which you could uncheck so that... you wouldn't auto-renew and get charged at the end of your term. This is pretty standard stuff.
- The ECA conveniently decided that the "auto-renew" button never worked so that anyone who thought they unchecked it previously didn't uncheck it (in the eyes of the ECA). They didn't communicate this to anyone directly. They just changed their TOS. If it weren't for caltab, a lot of people wouldn't even know about this and would have gotten charged next year.
- They also said that if your credit card expired, they would just keep guessing until they got the right expiration date.
- They decided the only way to cancel was to send in snail mail, which they might or might not ever get, so you better send it certified or FedEx. Also, you needed to send it in 30 days prior to your expiration date. But don't worry, they'd notify you 30 days before your expiration date.

Huge uproar over the need for snail mail and the fact that those who thought they cancelled via the uncheck auto renew option didn't actually uncheck it.

So far, all truths.

Now, here's my take on it.

- Instead of saying "our bad", Hal decided to go into attack mode.
- On a separate issue, there were people exploiting the 10% amazon discount.
- Hal decided the best way to defend his organization's actions was to blame the "exploiters." The exploiters, he said, kept calling into the ECA to cancel and then rejoining, then canceling. He said this was the reason why they had to implement the snail mail cancelation rule. (No mention of course about not communicating the non-auto-renewing auto renew button.)
- This is the salient point that ECA supporters refuse to accept: Because of the way the exploit worked, there was no need to cancel to get more codes.


So why the snail mail? Because they wanted to make it harder for people to cancel. (This was admitted by one of their mods on their forums.)

And, this is a classic method with which scammers run their business. Sign people up for a product, free at first, then make it harder to cancel as they happily charged your credit card. See Enzyte. (Although part of me thinks/hopes that this wasn't an outright scam. Just incompetence and arrogance.)[/QUOTE]






I believe you are pretty much right about what happened. But you forgot one important part. If you canceled your credit card, they would file fraud charges against you (Hal said something to the effect that the Credit Card companies frown on this or whatever). Remember that part? There was no way to get out except for the snail mail, and like you stated, by the time they reminded you that your account would auto renew, it was already too late to send in your letter to cancel, even if you shipped next day, since the letter had to be received 30 days before the renewal date (and their reminder came 30 days before renewal date). They were clever, shady, and knew what they were doing.


I agree and co-sign your post.
 
[quote name='dino88']I don't remember anyone talking/asking about the ECA's movement in the original ECA threads. Everything (if not everything, certainly the majority) was talk of discount codes.[/QUOTE]
This is a site to find deals on games. It doesn't surprise me that most of the talk was about the discounts. Just because people were only vocal (again on a site called Cheap Ass Gamer) about the discounts does not mean they didn't care about the organization's stated goals.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']I believe you are pretty much right about what happened. But you forgot one important part. If you canceled your credit card, they would file fraud charges against you (Hal said something to the effect that the Credit Card companies frown on this or whatever).[/QUOTE]

Not quite, though you are close. Halpin never directly said that the ECA would file fraud charges against us. What he did, though, was employ an indirect scare tactic to attempt to stop people from using their bank and/or credit card companies from protecting them from an unwanted charge. He claimed that people were contacting their financial institutions and telling them that the ECA had obtained their billing information fraudulently. And because this was obviously not the case, those people were gonna have investigation launched against them by their financial institutions.

Of course, like a lot of things Halpin has said during this controversy, this makes no sense. There would be no need for anyone to claim that their information was obtained fraudulently in order to get protection. You can just tell your financial institution that you tried to cancel a membership, the ECA was making it very difficult to do so, and that you want to dispute any charges they attempt to make to you. It's pretty apparent, though, that Halpin was merely clutching at straws and hoping that lazy (there's that word again) people would rush through the article, catch the part about fraud investigations, and be scared to go through the financial institutions for assistance.
 
[quote name='BWS1982']WTH, now there are what appear to be comments. Poorly written and thought out ones (like middle school level)...but comments are there.

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

FYI, I got back to this link because my most recent ECA newsletter had a link to it, it was worded as Hal Discussing membership complaints, so I wanted to see if it was his "interview" and it was, but now there are "comments" in it....Not all of them are right in line with ECA either, though it's hard to tell from the awful prose and grammar, so I'm curious how "those" got through....[/QUOTE]



If you notice, that is just one comment. I posted my huge comment, that I posted on here where I ripped apart the discrepancies in Hal's personal interview. I posted it as soon as that "interview" went up and my comments haven't appeared at all.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Not quite, though you are close. Halpin never directly said that the ECA would file fraud charges against us. What he did, though, was employ an indirect scare tactic to attempt to stop people from using their bank and/or credit card companies from protecting them from an unwanted charge. He claimed that people were contacting their financial institutions and telling them that the ECA had obtained their billing information fraudulently. And because this was obviously not the case, those people were gonna have investigation launched against them by their financial institutions.

Of course, like a lot of things Halpin has said during this controversy, this makes no sense. There would be no need for anyone to claim that their information was obtained fraudulently in order to get protection. You can just tell your financial institution that you tried to cancel a membership, the ECA was making it very difficult to do so, and that you want to dispute any charges they attempt to make to you. It's pretty apparent, though, that Halpin was merely clutching at straws and hoping that lazy (there's that word again) people would rush through the article, catch the part about fraud investigations, and be scared to go through the financial institutions for assistance.[/QUOTE]


He did state it, I am looking for a link, or at least a copy of his the quote since they deleted everything, if you cancel your card that they have on file, they WILL file fraud charges against you through your credit card provider. He did later state in his response to the Consumerist article that

"Needless to say, that incensed the exploiters who then contacted the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and their personal banks to report that we attained their membership under fraudulent conditions, in effect committing fraud themselves. Upon investigating the opened investigations, the respective banks and BBB all found ECA to be soundly reputable. We understand that several of the banks have since opened fraud investigations into their customers and that they take such matters very seriously."

This was after the fact. And I know this is what you were referring to. I want to think his statement I am talking about is here: http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105 but of course it is deleted.


I remember it well cause I thought it was ridiculous. I have posted about it several times in this thread and on GAF. I am not saying you are wrong and I am right. I may be wrong. But I swear he mentioned something about that other than what I posted above. Who knows, I am probably wrong and somehow thinking about the quote I saw above. I dont want you to think I am arguing or anything, I am nothing like that, lol. Either way, we both know this whole thing just keeps getting deeper and deeper. I would just love to see Hal do a REAL interview, with a 3rd party, and answer the questions they keep dodging since this whole issue began.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='UncleBob']SUGGESTION
Everyone take their $20 for next year's ECA Membership fee and donate it to the CAG Child's Play fundraiser.
What, there was 500 + names on that list? That's an extra $10,000 for Child's Play.[/QUOTE]

That is a great suggestion. I followed your lead and just donated $20.

Kevin
 
[quote name='kodave']I think to get to the heart of this whole controversy, it boils down to creating a time line from the following points:

1) The date when the Amazon codes last ran out (I'm sure we have a forum record of that here)

2) The date Amazon told ECA there would be no more codes (Surely there is an email record of this officially from the ECA's side - I'm sure there's old forum posts about it here)

3) The date when the "cancel auto-renewal" button was discovered by the ECA (They should have an email documenting this - after all, that's how they were alerted to it)

4) The date when the "cancel auto-renewal" button was removed (They should have an internal memo, or at least a work order to have the button removed)

5) The date when the TOS changed the option to cancel from a phone number to snail mail (Surely they have an internal memo and a letter to their legal counsel asking for an update on the TOS)

I think those simple questions can clarify this whole mess without getting into how or why the Amazon codes were abused or never came back.

The premise is this:
If numbers 3-5 have dates long after numbers 1-2, then clearly it would indicate there are bigger issues here, like these procedures were not undertaken to control abusive members.

If the dates are shortly after the Amazon codes ran out and weren't coming back, then it looks like a response to an actual issue of abuse.

Seems simple enough, right?

Because conceivably people might have been trying to register multiple accounts in the hopes the codes would come back or something (regardless of if that would work), but after we were told "no more codes" then surely the claim of "register-cancel-register-cancel" had to almost completely stop, right?

So I think if we can just get the information to string those dates together, we can see if this was an actual response to a problem, or if the ECA has twisted what was an unrelated problem to cover their own asses.

Agree?[/QUOTE]

The dates don't matter (although I'd also like a timeline of the events). What matters is that instead of dealing with the handful of scammers they implemented changes that affected ALL of their members. When people complained they said ALL the complainers were scammers. Besides the ECA's contention is that the cancel button on their site was a mistake and never worked so the issue is hardly about scammers.

Like I said before, the whole scammer issue is nothing but a smoke screen to cover their actions.

Anyway, if anyone could provide a detailed timeline with dates and quotes it would be extremely helpful.
 
[quote name='Scrubking']The dates don't matter (although I'd also like a timeline of the events). What matters is that instead of dealing with the handful of scammers they implemented changes that affected ALL of their members. When people complained they said ALL the complainers were scammers. Besides the ECA's contention is that the cancel button on their site was a mistake and never worked so the issue is hardly about scammers.

Like I said before, the whole scammer issue is nothing but a smoke screen to cover their actions.

Anyway, if anyone could provide a detailed timeline with dates and quotes it would be extremely helpful.[/QUOTE]

Even if they did the things they did to fix a legitimate problem, I agree they didn't go about doing them in the right way.

But the difference is, if they reacted, albeit in the wrong way, to try to fix a problem in a timely manner, that's more forgivable than if they changed their system on Thanksgiving for a problem that's been nonexistent since October 1 or something, you know?

I have a feeling this is a smokescreen as well, but I think the dates would really help put Halpin's story into perspective about how appropriate all these responses by the ECA were.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']This was after the fact. And I know this is what you were referring to. I want to think his statement I am talking about is here: http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105 but of course it is deleted.


I remember it well cause I thought it was ridiculous. I have posted about it several times in this thread and on GAF. I am not saying you are wrong and I am right. I may be wrong. But I swear he mentioned something about that other than what I posted above.[/QUOTE]

That's what Google's cache is for:

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105

And no, he's saying there too that people's banks have opened fraud investigations on them, not the ECA -- probably, again, people claiming that the ECA had gotten their information and charged them for their initial membership fee without authorization (a claim which would in fact be fraud if the person had knowingly and intentionally signed up for membership). I don't remember any point at which he said that the ECA themselves were going to file fraud charges against anyone.

[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Of course, like a lot of things Halpin has said during this controversy, this makes no sense. There would be no need for anyone to claim that their information was obtained fraudulently in order to get protection.[/QUOTE]

While that would be an incredibly stupid thing to do, I have no doubt (especially seeing some of the other dumb things that a few people have said here) that there may well have been one or two people who really tried to do that -- not necessarily to get out of future charges, but probably to try to back the dues they had already paid for this year since the ECA won't give refunds.
 
Great article. He really cleared up the situation. Just from forum posts here alone some people were really taking advantage of them. I was happy with my 10% off... already made for hot deals.
 
[quote name='randomthinker']Great article. He really cleared up the situation. Just from forum posts here alone some people were really taking advantage of them. I was happy with my 10% off... already made for hot deals.[/QUOTE]

Um, wow. You really haven't looked at this thread at all before posting, have you?
 
[quote name='arcane93']While that would be an incredibly stupid thing to do, I have no doubt (especially seeing some of the other dumb things that a few people have said here) that there may well have been one or two people who really tried to do that -- not necessarily to get out of future charges, but probably to try to back the dues they had already paid for this year since the ECA won't give refunds.[/QUOTE]

True enough. I wouldn't doubt a few stupid people tried it, but it's not something worth mentioning, in my opinion, unless you're trying to deploy a scare tactic on everyone.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']True enough. I wouldn't doubt a few stupid people tried it, but it's not something worth mentioning, in my opinion, unless you're trying to deploy a scare tactic on everyone.[/QUOTE]

Oh, of course he is. But he's probably not outright lying in this case, just overstating the truth. It's always possible that he wasn't trying to scare people in general, but rather just trying to discourage anyone else from trying that course of action. I think he's, overall, more inept than evil.
 
[quote name='Vader582']Oh yeah. He's cocky. Anyone seen Halpin's latest tweet? Think there are any hidden messages there?:lol:

http://twitter.com/HalHalpin
[/QUOTE]

He's about to get "knocked down again" by a 8 pound mass cancellation package.

USPS.com
2307 1770 0000 1360 8470
 
[quote name='randomthinker']Great article. He really cleared up the situation. Just from forum posts here alone some people were really taking advantage of them. I was happy with my 10% off... already made for hot deals.[/QUOTE]

Way to jump into a 193 page thread by reading one article and then a few posts, lol. :applause:

[quote name='chakan']He's about to get "knocked down again" by a 8 pound mass cancellation package.

USPS.com
2307 1770 0000 1360 8470[/QUOTE]

And probably a couple hundred Google holiday postcards as well. At least those will be more festive :D
 
[quote name='chakan']He's about to get "knocked down again" by a 8 pound mass cancellation package.

USPS.com
2307 1770 0000 1360 8470[/QUOTE]



What is considered cocky about his tweet? Does it have something to do with his "Paying It Forward" tweet? I cannot click on the link. Where does the link take you?



Was the package accepted at the ECA Offices, it says "Acceptance"
 
I've been trying to keep up with this thread, so sorry if this is old.

Has anyone noticed that The ECA has again changed the Terms and Conditions without notice? The most obvious change is that they removed the infamous section 5:
5. Right to update Credit Card Account Information. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.

Not that I'm complaining about the removal of this section, but this was in the T&C on 12/3/2009 and is now gone without any notice; they just don't learn. I'll have to check what else changed.

Also, I have documentation proving that the function to disable auto-renewal was available back in March 2009 (it's a post on forums.theeca.com where a user asks how to re-enable auto-renewal and Gypsyfly offers to help get an answer).
 
Maybe I missed something, as I haven't read every post here, but I thought the cancellations were supposed to go to Wilton, CT 06897-4406? The package just delivered and accepted was in Charlotte, NC?[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
 
[quote name='confoosious']Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.[/QUOTE]

Actually, there is one - selling the codes on eBay. In that instance, you would want a big batch of them.

Of course, everything else is true - there were definately easier ways to do this (hell, with the GIMAG code you could have just opened a ton of accounts). And frankly, I don't really believe what Hal said actually happened anyways. And clearly he is confusing the issue by mixing exploits around (i.e. eBay sales have nothing to do with stacking). To be honest, I wonder if *he* even knows how the exploit worked.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']What is considered cocky about his tweet? Does it have something to do with his "Paying It Forward" tweet? I cannot click on the link. Where does the link take you?[/QUOTE]
The link was to a video of the song "Tubthumpin'" by Chumbawanba

Here are the lyrics:
Chumbawamba
Tubthumper (1997)
Tubthumping


We'll be singing
When we're winning
We'll be singing

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

Pissing the night away
Pissing the night away

He drinks a whisky drink
He drinks a vodka drink
He drinks a lager drink
He drinks a cider drink
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the good times
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the better times:

'Oh Danny Boy
Danny Boy
Danny Boy...'

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

Pissing the night away
Pissing the night away

He drinks a whisky drink
He drinks a vodka drink
He drinks a lager drink
He drinks a cider drink
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the good times
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the better times:

'Don't cry for me
Next door neighbour...'

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

We'll be singing
When we're winning
We'll be singing
He obviously still thinks that he is the victim here. :roll:
 
[quote name='Lucian']I've been trying to keep up with this thread, so sorry if this is old.

Has anyone noticed that The ECA has again changed the Terms and Conditions without notice? The most obvious change is that they removed the infamous section 5:
5. Right to update Credit Card Account Information. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.

Not that I'm complaining about the removal of this section, but this was in the T&C on 12/3/2009 and is now gone without any notice; they just don't learn. I'll have to check what else changed.
[/QUOTE]

Ya, it seems like they've revised their terms of service to get rid of that clause. Again, I think this is a very positive step. We should be encouraging them with at least some acknowledgment that they are taking the right steps, and not solely be focused on their past mistakes.
 
[quote name='caltab']Ya, it seems like they've revised their terms of service to get rid of that clause. Again, I think this is a very positive step. We should be encouraging them with at least some acknowledgment that they are taking the right steps and not solely be focused on their past mistakes.[/QUOTE]

But to be fair, the majority of the people are doing both. It's just hard to tell since if one person starts focusing about the past, everyone else jumps on that ship. Most of the people that are arguing about what they have done in the past in these few pages did already state in their first post that they are taking a step in the right direction. But normally there is always one guy that says otherwise, and the discussion of how badly they screwed up in the past ensues and that's all you see in the upcoming pages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top