That seems a little extreme. They're letting people keep the full BiaB2 bundle for a dollar because that's what their site was advertising. They're only revoking the higher tier keys that showed up in people's profiles for old bundles that they only bought the low tier for. Those keys accidentally appeared in profiles without ever being promised or paid for, and most people didn't even notice before they fixed it, so it's hardly the same scenario as GG clearly offering a deal and then snatching it back.
I mean, if you decide to refuse to do business with them forever for taking back something that you were obviously never meant to get in the first place, that's your right. But it's also my right to insult you and think less of you as a person if you do that.
If "most people didn't even notice" as you claim then why bother taking such a drastic measure that makes people nervous? And let's get real, the value of those games from old bundles is not very much at all. It's not like people got a bunch of free copies of some expensive hot new release.
I agree with some of the others in that revoking already activated game keys should only be used in extreme cases of fraud, theft or hacking
through no fault or negligence of the site. To do so otherwise is bullshit. They need to take responsibility for their own negligence, fix it accordingly to prevent or minimize it and then move on.
Let's look at this way, say a physical product accidentally packaged up two or three items when one was intended and a bunch of those went out? So what then? Go to people's houses and take it away? Of course not. What's done is done. You address the problem and know better for the next time.
As far as I am concerned ownership of digital goods needs to be treated like ownership of physical goods. Those goods are essentially in someone's house now. If you have cause to believe that person intentionally shoplifted the product or otherwise stole it from someone then go through the due process sure. If it's a store or producer mistake then you shouldn't get to do that, sorry.
The thing these sites throwing revokes around like it's a simple matter don't get is that
it's reminding everyone that they technically don't own their digital games; they own a license to them. One that can be canceled at any time. When selling digital goods is your bread and butter I don't think you want to do that.
I'm not arguing for people to have those games; we all know they're old indie games that have been bundled multiple times and aren't worth shit anyway. I'm arguing that there's some really serious slippery slope principle going on. In the past, revokes were extremely rare and only done in the most serious, severe cases where some intentional fraud or theft was done. Now it's starting to become a much more casual thing. And that's not good for any of us who buy digital games.
I may be an addict even but it's definitely going to give me pause the more sites that start resorting to this.