[quote name='Danil ACE']I would consider this if it was $400, but $500+tax is too much for what the PS3 offers. I'm not biased, I actually bought this bundle last summer and ended up returning it after a few weeks because I felt that I wasn't getting the best bang for my buck. A major appeal of the PS3 to me used to be the fact that it could play blu ray movies, but now there are excellent players with equal or better PQ than the PS3 for significantly less.[/quote]
Well, one could just get a 360, a PS2, and a Blu-ray player.
360 with 60GB (w/o wireless adapter) - $300
PS2 - $100
So, now one would have $100 left for a Blu-ray player. That is, if they don't need to connect the 360 to the wireless router. In that case, they've already spent their $500. This is definitely a pricey unit, but if one is in the market for all three things, it's an awesome value.
I'll never understand why people don't see the value in the PS3. I'm constantly seeing the "overpriced" tag slapped on it. Is $400 or $500 a lot? Of course, but there's a difference between expensive and overpriced. If you want a current-gen game console and a high-definition player, it's an absolute no-brainer. Even if you don't want a high-definition player that much, the PS3 is still a great value, because if you watch movies at all, you'll eventually want the newer technology eventually. I don't know too many people who are still rocking their VHS players exclusively.