[quote name='dizee']Ive played this game for a few hours and can already tell its complete garbage compared to the first.
Wont go into single player much but from what I have played so far its alot worse than MW1
Online is solid but the fact that you cant play with any of your friends atm is the reason why I refuse to play it. Atleast with socom you could find a room and tell your friends to join even if the game was a buggy pile of crap on day 1.
and ya trophies are bugged due to the patch so I imagine if you want em you will have to delete your save data and start over or they wont unlock because they dont want people using other peoples saves (similar to uncharted 1 when they released the trophy patch).
and IDK how ign gave this game a 10 for graphics. they are exactly the same as MW1. They gave this a 10 but KZ2 a 9.5. go figure. The graphics are good but they are far from a 10.[/QUOTE]
I was going to say the same thing! But to add, they used the same textures, from COD4. This game is like COD4 Remix. The invite system has the SAME problem that COD4 had, (doesn't work). I'll give it credit that it may work once in a blue moon; however for me it hasn't worked yet. I think the game is good, its fun, I love it for what it is. But if you're going to judge the whole package, graphics, gameplay, online gameplay, online features, etc. I don't see how this game can be considered GOTY.
IGN giving this game a 10 in graphics is ludicrous. The only graphical improvements that I see are mostly with the guns; they are more detailed and they have more accents in the stage (i.e. sparks flying, moving objects, dust, etc). All I know is if Sony were to make a SOCOM game with KZ2 graphics in FPS Mode I'd never play this again. Also, the blood splatter is great in MW2, but what's surprising is that you don't get the effect of limbs falling off that you get in World at War. [if I'm wrong please let me know... because I havent seen it yet, online or offline]