[quote name='LottaGames']Live is buggier.[/quote]
You are flat smoking dope. Only one game has ever had lag for me (Gears). So far on PS3, I have had 3 games. I had my Xbox a good year more than the PS3 plus I play it more so you would think if it was buggie/laggier I would have seen more cases on Xbox. Plus, Xbox has never been down for me when I tried to play (Microsoft does maintenance over nights when they do it). PS3 on the other hand was down one time I tried to play due to a time gltich. It was out for a full day because they didn't know what
ing happened. Oh no strikes a Y2K type bug :lol:
It's also too expensive when better services are free and it's overrun by children.
Only children complain paying what equates to less than 10 cents a day.
Fact: Children play on both systems
Perhaps they feel safer there than playing with adults on a real platform.
And your calling me the fan boy :lol:
No doubt CoD is buggy too, Act can't produce a good game.
To you its not a good game but by the fact that to date Black Ops is #1 on the NPD sales charts I would say that you are in the minority for thinking the COD titles are bad games. Are they buggy online? Yes. You have millions of people trying to play it at the same time. It is the number 1 online console game. People always look for away to break a game for their advantage. On Xbox though this game hasn't been shutdown online like it was on PS3 and a forced PS3 patch was required for ALL PS3 users due to all the piracy/cheating from that game on PS3...thanks PS3 for being a glorified computer than users can break it at any whim they want
That site is wrong. PSN hasn't been down that often, maybe the updates were done without dropping the whole network.
In the great words of Steven Tyler.... DREAM ON, DREAM ON
It's down all the time due to my last statement above.
Typical fanboy kid response. I own more games and consoles than you do so I'm not a fan of a single one.
No I actually have owned the majority of systems and I make determinations on what I considered a better product which Live is (again, only PC beats it). Unlike someone like you who only owns one system and considered the best (i.e. the definition of a fan boy)... I started back on a commodore 64 with Jordan vs Bird... maybe that can help you on my age
It offers nothing but ads over the others, everyone knows that.
Talking like someone who again has never been on Live let alone Xbox 360 at all. What you think are ads are actually functional things you can do like all the things TMac stated earlier plus videos you can watch, games that you can purchases, sales ongoing, gamercard/settings etc.
Perhaps a little paranoid of Nin but letting the childrun run rampant is why Live is inferior.
Again... FACT: Children also game on PS3.
Eye Toy was PS2. PS3 has the PSEye and plenty did. Either because it was a cheap way to get a quality mic, because they played Eye of Judgment before it was phased out, or when they got a Move.
The product is the same no matter a name change. Nobody had the product hence why it was clearanced/no one carried/developer supported it. It was a piece of crap similiar to the Xbox 360 camera that first came out.
Actually no, Kinect doesn't compare. Price, functionality, versatility, etc. It's not even original since people were playing camera games on PS2.
It is a way better concept that your bogus Eye Toy. It captures full movement of your body, voice commands, etc. Dance Central + Kinect takes Dance Dance Revolution to a whole new level. The upside potential that other developers will follow in Harmonix's footsteps makes the Kinect the best idea from last year (gaming peripheral). The Move controller, on the other hand, is a two part Wii remote that is a waste of time/space. Killzone 3 reviews essentially state it is insanely inferior to a controller for the game. Who would want the Move knowing that; I thought that was part of the selling point... not this guy.
[/QUOTE]
.
