Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Black Teen Shot, Killed By Neighborhood Watch


  • Please log in to reply
2351 replies to this topic

#2191 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 02:59 PM

I'd like to see your rebuttal as the article brings some pretty interesting statistics to light. 
Context? How do you explain this:

I just want to hear DD's explanation one more time how a minority population can be the majority of violent crime offenders against their own and other populations yet its the WHITE(hispanic) volunteer watchmen that they need to fear.

 
I'll go ahead and brace myself for laws=racist; government=racist; judicial process=racist; statistic=racist; author=racist and poster=racist.

 
God forbid we be accountable.

irony meter asplodered
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#2192 jputahraptor

jputahraptor

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 05:20 PM

^Nothing racist there! :rofl:

 

liberalism-obama-president-taxes-democra


"Slap a liberal today, you'll both feel better."
"Nobody dies an atheist."
http://i464.photobuc...maSocialist.jpg

#2193 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 05:33 PM

http://youngcons.com...immerman-trial/

 

Watching this interview you can see why many black people are upset or angry.  This NAACP guy says GZ stalked, assauted then shot.

And at the end he says GZ said he was looking specificly for black people Lol.  Dude just makes things up.

 

Then claims the answer to Chicago is gun control.  Because sure it's a gun problem, not a gang or black problem.  And finally Hannity asks him to name 1  of  the 61 black teens killed in Chicago during the Zimmerman trial.  He couldn't name one.

 

http://www.youtube.c...eature=youtu.be  EX gang member, i was a racist, i blamed white people, now i think outside of the box. Al Sharpton is a racist

 

 

http://nation.foxnew...verdict-through   Black Pastor says black people had Zimmerman as guilty 'years ago' because they're black.  Although he seems a bit crazy in the video i applaud certain points.  The paranoid pot point is one ive already made.  Though he insinuates GZ profilled him because he was black which i disagee with.

 

I'm not even looking for this stuff but it's interesting the more and more things im coming across that seem to signal a swing from irrational lynching, to more reasoned analysis.


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2194 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 05:49 PM

Hearing Obama speak, just shows he's trying to push this incident for gun control or to demolish stand your ground law.    He is trying to say that if the teen had a gun he could have shot Zimmerman for following him.  I cant believe this guy is president


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2195 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:06 PM

liberalism-obama-president-taxes-democra

This is nice and all, but even William Buckley, the crypto-nazi himself, called Pat Buchanan and anti-semite. Or maybe you and dilemna agree with him in regards to the Holocaust being overblown or how black people should be grateful that whites took them out of Africa? I know of at least one CAG that does. But hey, I'm just not so eager to side with someone so repugnant, but you two seem to enjoy playing in a pool of ignorance that you don't give a crap about the quality of content of your posts as long as you "win" the argument.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#2196 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:06 PM

So there's no evidence he racially profilled him.  It actually seems likely he didn't given what we know. Very likely.  But Obama says

 

''It could have been me''    Clearly bringing race into it, and somewhat making a connection with race.  Dude is an unprofessional pres.  He had a lot of time to write something to prepare for what he was going to say today. And unless it's some sort of appeasment to the anger or rioting, what he said is just so far the wrong thing to say.

 

http://patdollard.co...rman-a-new-gun/  Dude offers to buy GZ a new gun if he doesn't get his gun back.  He then makes the point you're a racist if you think only white people can be racist. The black woman responded, you can be prejudice, but you can only be racist if you have power.  What the Fuck


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2197 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:09 PM

He is trying to say that if the teen had a gun he could have shot Zimmerman for following him.

Should Martin have waited until he had already experienced great bodily harm before he hypothetically shot Zimmerman?
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#2198 bear489

bear489

    Give me them tags!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 07:30 PM

Should Martin have waited until he had already experienced great bodily harm before he hypothetically shot Zimmerman?


Why and how does a teen have a gun? Last I check you need to be 21 years old. But to answer your question Martin would have been charged with 2nd murder and convicted since following someone is not illegal and posed no threat. Where as Martin was on top of Zimmerman punching him. Forcing Zimmerman to shoot. SYG was never brought up by defense or the prosecution. It came up when the judge was giving instructions to the jury.

#2199 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 07:42 PM

Why and how does a teen have a gun? Last I check you need to be 21 years old. But to answer your question Martin would have been charged with 2nd murder and convicted since following someone is not illegal and posed no threat. Where as Martin was on top of Zimmerman punching him. Forcing Zimmerman to shoot. SYG was never brought up by defense or the prosecution. It came up when the judge was giving instructions to the jury.

Read dilemna's post again and then read my reply...again. It's takes a real special kind of reading comprehension to screw up 4 sentences.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#2200 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 07:50 PM

What would he be defending himself from?   If someone is following him then call the police, if he got too close, he could draw his gun and ask questions.  At no point could following somebody lead to a shot unless somebody went from following to attempting something more.

 

The bigger point with Obama, is he had a chance to come out and fully be honest and upfront about the whole situation or to simply know it's not his place to talk on such a situation. Instead he tried to appease ignorant of the facts angry people, rioters, and all round just fueled more race baiting views. Not only that he insinuated SYG was primary responsible, and again compared himself. Which isn't a big deal if he was a pot smoking paranoid teen who sometimes punched people.  

 

There have been many cases such as when two black people shot a 13 month toddler in the head intentionally, he didn't talk about.  Or just today 4 blacks in georgia, beat to death a veteran of two duties.   So how can you pick and choose what to involve yourself on? It's why you don't comment really, not to mention he already commented on this case before.  He's exploiting the case for his own agenda with guns and laws, while trying to appease a large section of people who see things through a black tinted view or/and are rioting due to being ignorant of the full facts.

 

This case didn't and never did have anything to do with race.  So unless somewhere i missed it where that was shown otherwise, why the hell would he start comparing himself specificly which obviously related to color. 

 

It was a bad call today.  When you combine that with the keeping of GZ gun for longer at the request, and laughing off a question about GZ safety as 'ridiculous'  You have to wonder really when he says respect the verdict, if his administration and him are respecting the verdict.


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2201 Knoell

Knoell

    Achievement Unlocked

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 08:02 PM

 

Please don't waste my time with bullshit arguments. I'm not here claiming that every time something happens involving more than one race, there must be racism involved. Nor do I think that the fact that it doesn't happen every time means that racism never happens. That's just stupid. So is pretending that you, or "normal" people are colorblind. That's a lie, and everyone here knows it. I was wondering in my original post if people here find thesmselves thinking not about whether someone is Black or Hispanic, but about how black or Hispanic someone is.

 

I never said that we live in a post racial world. It is definitely a thousand times better than it ever was though.

 

The problem I have is that everyone thinks it is so obvious that Zimmerman was profiling because Martin was black. They make that leap too quickly and it is a baseless accusation that doesn't help anything because it overrides and derails legitimate explanations.

 

Regardless though, the whole point of those examples were to highlight that if there are legitimate reasons for conflict where race isn't involved, then there can be legitimate reasons for conflict when race is involved that don't involve race.

 

If a Hispanic person will murder a Hispanic person for whatever reason, then a white person murdering a Hispanic person may not be racial, it could possibly be for the same type dispute the Hispanic had with the Hispanic. Again this doesn't mean that people don't do things based on their dislike for a particular race, but that people do things for other reasons too that don't involve race.



#2202 Finger_Shocker

Finger_Shocker

    CAG Veteran

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 08:10 PM

What about Martin's right to STAND YOUR GROUND against a racist stalker who was following him?

 

Why is Zimmerman the only one who had to right to kill Martin...

 

Oh and Obama talking about Martin, LOL.... you see all the right wing racist here who are even more gleeful that Martin was shot dead..

 

In fact Martin's death is a right wing rallying point to stab at Obama..

 

YAY!!! Love those right wing conservative racist republican voters here !!!!!



#2203 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 July 2013 - 08:14 PM

What would he be defending himself from?   If someone is following him then call the police, if he got too close, he could draw his gun and ask questions.  At no point could following somebody lead to a shot unless somebody went from following to attempting something more.

Well, if we're talking about hypotheticals, then it's fully possible that Zimmerman was wearing a KKK hood without the face-flap and lunged at Martin in a racist pederast rage and tried to get some of that teenage thug-lyfe ass...you know...since we're talking about hypotheticals and all. I mean we could make up ANY crazy scenario we can think of! :roll:
 

The bigger point with Obama, is he had a chance to come out and fully be honest and upfront about the whole situation or to simply know it's not his place to talk on such a situation. Instead he tried to appease ignorant of the facts angry people, rioters, and all round just fueled more race baiting views. Not only that he insinuated SYG was primary responsible, and again compared himself. Which isn't a big deal if he was a pot smoking paranoid teen who sometimes punched people.

How is it not his place? There are nationwide protests, with most being uneventful for that matter.

White-washing is race baiting too. Seems like you're only interested in legitimizing white experience and delegitimizing the perspective of people of color.
 

There have been many cases such as when two black people shot a 13 month toddler in the head intentionally, he didn't talk about.  Or just today 4 blacks in georgia, beat to death a veteran of two duties.   So how can you pick and choose what to involve yourself on? It's why you don't comment really, not to mention he already commented on this case before.  He's exploiting the case for his own agenda with guns and laws, while trying to appease a large section of people who see things through a black tinted view or/and are rioting due to being ignorant of the full facts.

And how many of those cases weren't prosecuted? How many riots were there? And black communities shouldn't have a voice or be able to give their perspective on this?
 

This case didn't and never did have anything to do with race.  So unless somewhere i missed it where that was shown otherwise, why the hell would he start comparing himself specificly which obviously related to color.

You and others said exactly why it has to do with race: black burglars and Martin was a black kid that was walking around suspiciously in the rain with a hoodie on aka walking in the rain while talking on a headset.
 

It was a bad call today.  When you combine that with the keeping of GZ gun for longer at the request, and laughing off a question about GZ safety as 'ridiculous'  You have to wonder really when he says respect the verdict, if his administration and him are respecting the verdict.

The DoJ is doing an investigation and wants to hold on to evidence and as for Zimmerman's safety, that would be upto the Sanford Police Department unless you don't have faith in them to do their jobs right.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#2204 renique46

renique46

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 02:15 AM

I have no idea why you keep bothering to reply to the mighty morphing pliskin rangers doh.



#2205 Purple Flames

Purple Flames

    MC Sucka DJ

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 08:36 AM

This is a very good article. http://www.newyorker...-have-done.html



#2206 Knoell

Knoell

    Achievement Unlocked

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 09:16 AM

This is a very good article. http://www.newyorker...-have-done.html

 

That author, and I am assuming you, seem to be getting the verdict and what you think may have happened mixed up.

 

What Martin should have done is not what is on trial. Whether or not Zimmerman should be convicted of the charges was. The jury could not convict a man because they could not be sure what happened in that period of time.

 

We can't ask "what Martin should have done differently", because we don't really know what he did besides zimmermans biased side of the story.

 

If Zimmerman kept harassing him and trying to detain him, then maybe there would of been a conviction, but no one knows that.



#2207 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 09:41 AM

Yep, not sure how you can call something guessing and making up a good article. It's somewhat unlikely that Zimmerman would try to detain, he's never done it before to all knowledge.  And when following he kept a clear distance.  If anything he'd look to know where he went then again keep an eye on him so he'd know where he was when the cops came.  I really don't see him wanting to get too close. 

 

Here's the response from Zimmerman's defense on Obama

 

 

We have listened to President Obama’s comments about the verdict in the Zimmerman Case. People are focusing on this quote: “Trayvon Martin could’ve been me 35 years ago.” To focus on this one line misses the nuances of the President’s message, which includes comments about how African Americans view the Zimmerman Case in the context of the history of racial disparity in America.

For more than a year, we have been listening to the conversation about this case — from voices on every side — and we have become very sensitive to the racial context that surrounds this case. We acknowledge Mr. Obama’s remarks regarding the frustration felt by some when viewed in context of our nation’s history, which includes racial insensitivities spanning generations, and existing even today, including within our criminal justice system.

While we acknowledge and understand the racial context of this case, we challenge people to look closely and dispassionately at the facts. We believe those who look at the facts of the case without prejudice will see that it is a clear case of self-defense, and we are certain that those who take a closer look at the kind of person George Zimmerman is — something we understand the Department of Justice is currently doing — we are confident they will find a young man with with a diverse ethnic and racial background who is not a racist, a man who is, in fact, sensitive to the complex racial history of our country.

It takes courage to talk about race. It took courage for our President to address the Zimmerman Case and candidly discuss how and why people are upset by the verdict. We would like to stress that the verdict was reached fairly and justly and that it reflects the letter of the law and represents the law’s proper application to the facts. While we acknowledge the racial context of the case, we hope that the President was not suggesting that this case fits a pattern of racial disparity, because we strongly contend that it does not.

This case has given the nation an opportunity to have a candid conversation about race. We would like to contribute to this discourse. Our President has clearly indicated he is willing to contribute to the discourse. As we begin this conversation, we want to say this: we cannot talk about race in sound bites. Before you cast an opinion about what the President said, be sure to listen to his comments in full. Before you judge George Zimmerman or disparage the verdict of the citizen jury, understand the facts in full. Agree not to listen to just what meets your predisposition, but to accept what exists.

Only in this way can we assure that the conversations we want to have, that we need to have, will be attended and listened to by those whose presence is necessary for a full discourse — a discourse that can have positive consequences for our growth as a nation.


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2208 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 09:56 AM

Estimated that Zimmerman has recieved over 150,000 ......death threats.   This woman has gotten 100 just for having a number close to Zimmerman's  http://www.wftv.com/...-threats/nYxZj/

 

Cant be bothered to post the articles but numerous hispanics attacked by anti zimmerman protesters, robbed and what not.  Amazingly there's people thanking Obama for bringing up the issue of race, despite the negative impact it's having on these people attacked.

 

Eric Holder the man who doesn't care about the IRS report, the man who when he came into his new job dropped the case against the Black Panthers(same black panthers who scream in the street kill their babies, about white people it's on video) the man who supplys Mexican drug gangs with weapons.....has now said he told his son about racial profilling due to this case, and has instructed that Zimmerman doesn't get his gun back yet as they study the evidence.    From the best country in the world to this....Amazing.

 

Most polls show majority of people agree with the verdict. And majority don't think it was racism.   Wouldn't think that judging by the media.

 

It's so crazy all this shit about a case with no indication of race being a factor, i keep saying it but it's crazy.  

 

Zimmerman called non emeregency cops over 30 times, fact he called on white people, hispanic people and black people.  He saw somebody acting suspicious, wal but king slow in the rain, at night, looking around, so he did what he usually does, take no chances, call non emergency get a patrol car to check him out or circle the area. 

 

That's that.  But somehow we only talking about race from this?  Am i an idiot cos i just cant grasp how people assume with certainty it was racially motivated, absolutely nothing to suggest it?

 

Pre concieved views on people's prejudice?  Automatic response to a black male seen as suspicious?  Unable to shake off the media's initial malacious editing and false portrayal of what was said?    Strange but it's not productive whatsoever to be speculative without foundation in such an unprovable and not applicable case.

 

I mean people are encouraging others not to report or be vigiliante against suspicious people that are black in fear of being branded racist.  Imagine you're a neighborhood watch or security person now?    You'd be shit scared to approach or call up on a black person, cos if the situation develops, you'd worry the media will look to frame you for sensationalistic purposes, race baiters will jump all over it, the person can then claim discrimination to help get away with whatever they were doing, or teach you a lesson.  It's just mindless.

 

If he signalled him out cos he was black, you can have the debate ok he racially profilled him but still was he within his rights to defend himself or why do people profile and subjects about race.  But there's no indication at all he racially profilled.   This is the world of liberals though.


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2209 slidecage

slidecage

    Nothing to say

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 01:52 PM

who the Fuck  cares what obama says... o i can be him..

 

if  obama cares about people why dont he say he could of been the  poor  13 year old boy who  was killed by the 65 year old white man  cause he thought the kid broke in his house and took his guns...

 

http://www.blackyout...darius-simmons/

 

 

Why the Fuck    did this never make the national news ...

 

 

 

 

 

o thats right cause obama is just playing the race card.....

 

hey obama if you gave a damn about people maybe instead of taking at  100 million buck  trip you could of gave it  to the people  in the poor areas   ...... hell no you will never do that.


WOOOO I STINK

#2210 Purple Flames

Purple Flames

    MC Sucka DJ

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 05:29 PM

That author, and I am assuming you, seem to be getting the verdict and what you think may have happened mixed up.

 

What Martin should have done is not what is on trial. Whether or not Zimmerman should be convicted of the charges was. The jury could not convict a man because they could not be sure what happened in that period of time.

 

We can't ask "what Martin should have done differently", because we don't really know what he did besides zimmermans biased side of the story.

 

If Zimmerman kept harassing him and trying to detain him, then maybe there would of been a conviction, but no one knows that.

 

Spoiler



#2211 Knoell

Knoell

    Achievement Unlocked

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 06:11 PM

Spoiler

 

Not quite, but whatever you say.



#2212 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 06:25 PM

Want to read the most stupid article possible from all this? 

 

Even more stupid than the article claiming the verdict was reached because white women fear black men.....

 

From professor somehow professor Anthea Butler http://www.religiond...a_s_racist_god/


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2213 Finger_Shocker

Finger_Shocker

    CAG Veteran

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 06:39 PM

Why is it everytime when someone tries to really talk about race relations in America all these racist white conservatives keep calling it "stiring the pot"

 

It seems like these white right wing conservatives can't even bring themselves to admit or talk about the truth, they just want to it ignored ..  Why?  cause you know you lost your precious civil slavery war?  you lost your attempts to segregate?  you lost your attempt to kill blacks without reason?

 

WHY? because institutionalized racism is your last ability to hold on to being a racist without admitting you are a racist, your last stand on keeping the white power structure, your ability to degrade minorities without actual direct seeable action?



#2214 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 07:30 PM

Why is it everytime when someone tries to really talk about race relations in America all these racist white conservatives keep calling it "stiring the pot"

 

It seems like these white right wing conservatives can't even bring themselves to admit or talk about the truth, they just want to it ignored ..  Why?  cause you know you lost your precious civil slavery war?  you lost your attempts to segregate?  you lost your attempt to kill blacks without reason?

 

WHY? because institutionalized racism is your last ability to hold on to being a racist without admitting you are a racist, your last stand on keeping the white power structure, your ability to degrade minorities without actual direct seeable action?

 

Oh no, talk about racism openly.  It'll completely obliterate all the ignorant clueless people who continue to call conservatives racists while encouraging racism.

 

Check out the statistics.  They don't lie, even if you do.

 

If you really care about 'racism' then why are you directing your racist accusations purely at conservatives?  Are you suggesting there's no racist democrats, no racist blacks?    I've came across about 10,000 in the last week.

As for instituionalized racism, which is a nice phrase, given  you're of the thinking that this case was a product of institutionalized racism, it pretty much confirms you'll cite anything in that category to keep the idea institutionalized racism is rampant, something hard pressed to prove or disprove is perfect for somebody like yourself.

 

As for the civil war comments, do your research man.  But tell me do you think slavery made slaves and black people racist?   Being treated like 2nd class citizens?    Would you be surprised if it did make some a bit racist?

 

So what if you have a miniority committing the majority of the crimes, what if your daughter got sexually assaulted, raped, by this miniority.  What if your kid got bullied in school by this miniority, what if your house got burgled, your car stolen by this miniority.   Then what if this miniority glorified this behavior, and boasted about it with many others finding it funny.  Then what if this miniority claimed they were victimized and treated unfairly, while being supported and defended by braindead liberals just because they hate conservatives and like to believe right wing = backward and racist?    Would you be a bit racist?   You probably would, but guess what many of those who've suffered due to this crime manage to not hold racist views, yet they'll be labelled racist, for simply relaying their experience..  Most of what conservatives say about race is based on facts, almost nothing you say isn't remotely close to a fact yet very prejudice and stereotypical, precisely the things you claim to be against.  But guess what, slavery is over, times have moved on, i don't know why slavery would even be brought up in this day and age except in a history class.  There's no logical reason for people to dislike black people or be racist.  There is logical reasons for people to dislike a culture or actions by most of  the time black people things backed up by statistics and crime rates.  So if you hate racism(which quite clearly you don't as you're guilty of it in every post you make) wouldn't you want to tackle those crime rates, those actions that culture...therefore eliminating the #1 cause of possible racist stereotypical views?  Yet that's the last thing you focus on.   Pretty strange.

 

Speaking of facts.

 

Warning as some graphic pictures but just sums up the GZ case perfectly.   Real truth  see if you liberal guys can take your liberal hat off and actually wonder if you got this story right.

 

http://therightscoop...orge-zimmerman/


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2215 GBAstar

GBAstar

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 08:52 PM

Why is it everytime when someone tries to really talk about race relations in America all these racist white conservatives keep calling it "stiring the pot"

 

It seems like these white right wing conservatives can't even bring themselves to admit or talk about the truth, they just want to it ignored ..  Why?  cause you know you lost your precious civil slavery war?  you lost your attempts to segregate?  you lost your attempt to kill blacks without reason?

 

WHY? because institutionalized racism is your last ability to hold on to being a racist without admitting you are a racist, your last stand on keeping the white power structure, your ability to degrade minorities without actual direct seeable action?

 

 

Hey Mr. Racist! Let's pretend you're black and have a young black child. You don't believe in fairy tells (Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, Racist Neighborhood Watchmen) and always shoot it straight with your son.

 

He is old enough to know the truth about the world and he asks you who is most likely to harm him. You live in the internet age and have countless information at your fingertips. 

 

Do you tell him the truth (i.e. that he is most likely to be harmed by someone of his own race) or do you lie?



#2216 dilemna

dilemna

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 09:04 PM

Alternate juror the only male in the jurors list who just happenend to be black as well...says he would have found GZ not guilty.

 

http://www.realclear...he_verdict.html

 

Expect a change from 'old white jury'  to 'prosecution didn't make their case well'   Also he says he doesn't think he racially profilled.  So yet another black person who actually studied all the evidence comes to a different conclusion to the rioters who mostly have no clue about anything

 

 

Seems like judging by the lawsuit against NBC.   Atorneys for the teen approached NBC's Al Sharpton in an attempt to make it racial to help sue the police department.   May even explain the subsequent editing of the 911 call by mysterious people at NBC who were since fired, which began the race talk and interest.   So a race baiter looking for $$ was the root of all this?  What a surprise.


I'm not opposed to some trolling and I'm guilty of it myself.

 


#2217 Msut77

Msut77

    Occam's Shank

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 10:13 PM

Why is it everytime when someone tries to really talk about race relations in America all these racist white conservatives keep calling it "stiring the pot"

 

It seems like these white right wing conservatives can't even bring themselves to admit or talk about the truth, they just want to it ignored ..  Why?  cause you know you lost your precious civil slavery war?  you lost your attempts to segregate?  you lost your attempt to kill blacks without reason?

 

WHY? because institutionalized racism is your last ability to hold on to being a racist without admitting you are a racist, your last stand on keeping the white power structure, your ability to degrade minorities without actual direct seeable action?

 

 

I for one love the fake concern for violence in chicago or insert urban place here.


wahhhhh noone helped me so they must not help anyone. - knoell

#2218 Knoell

Knoell

    Achievement Unlocked

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 July 2013 - 10:30 PM

They call it stirring the pot because this case wasn't related to race at all you twits.

 

Please give me some evidence that racism was present here besides your own racist "well it was a kinda white guy watching a black kid, and everyone knows that people suspect black kids, so it must have been racially motivated".



#2219 jputahraptor

jputahraptor

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 21 July 2013 - 02:19 AM

They call it stirring the pot because this case wasn't related to race at all you twits.

 

Please give me some evidence that racism was present here besides your own racist "well it was a kinda white guy watching a black kid, and everyone knows that people suspect black kids, so it must have been racially motivated".

 

Feelings are the new facts for liberals, why bother with evidence or testimony when their feelings trump your facts.  But it only works their way.  If you disagree with abortion for example because you feel it's a human life, you lose the argument because conservative feelings are not valid, and oh yeah your a racist for thinking abortion is wrong even though your argument has nothing to do with race and you didn't even mention it.  


"Slap a liberal today, you'll both feel better."
"Nobody dies an atheist."
http://i464.photobuc...maSocialist.jpg

#2220 Finger_Shocker

Finger_Shocker

    CAG Veteran

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 21 July 2013 - 05:02 AM

"Statistics says BLACKS are responsible for more crimes"  - by conservative posters

 

But statistics also says racists tend to be white, conservative, republican voters, HOWEVER conservatives will be the first to say DON'T paint a broad stroke against us.... LOL!!!!!!!!!!

 

I ain't racist, you see my neighbor is black, I give to churches who give MY money to minorities, heck I got ONE black friend, so I can't be racist... I however am very much ok when a innocent black teen gets murdered, minorities gets profiled, and throwing more minorities in jail for the same offenses as whites :) but hey I ain't raccccciiiiiist, I just see things "politically different" then you........

 

Who knew RACISTs want to be a part of the political system and keeping certain political practices against minorities in place... Color me FARKING SHOCKED, that racists want to be part of the political system, and their excuse is because they see this politically different.. 

 

Why don't you people just put on you farking white robe, and recite the white brotherhood pledge of allegence, and just admit it.  I rather have you be proud of your racism then to be coy and sneaky about it...