That's quite the story you've fabricated there. Let's unpack it a little bit.Oh that was after all the name calling you have been throwing ever since I have joined this forum. If you recall I even tried to be more polite but you just could not play nice. There is a point when you realize that an asshole needs some of his own medicine because rationality is just wasted on him.
Well perhaps you can help me then since English is my third language. From what I understand it the term defines someone after the fact in order for it to appear it a better light. Perhaps I am wrong as I honestly I think I have heard this term once or twice in my life, probably sometime when I was in school. So I guess I could have thrown it at you since you think liberals are so much superior and yet they were just as bad as republicans of the Bush era. Does the term apply?
Are you talking about the post where you just called Trump baby hands? I just went back and read it. 2 of those paragraphs are just spent attacking Trump. One paragraph mentions the ground game and Warren not endorsing Clinton. Seriously is this all you have or is there another post?
Edit: Ok I see another post where you say they should tell it like it is. Yeah that might have helped if you guys had a genuine candidate but even though you still would have lost this particular election. Obama was a failure even by liberal standards. ACA is shit. Foreign policy is shit. Bernie was a better chance in a sense that he was honest and down to earth but socialism is actually not that popular. Sorry but again one of the major reasons why you guys lost besides the fact that you guys are no longer sticking to your values is that you guys are just plain assholes. Everyone who disagrees with you are labeled as racists, homophobes and etc. Shit you called me a racist and you don't even remember why. I actually remember, it was because I am against welfare programs as I think of them to be unethical and think social safety nets should exist through private means. I remember that because I was thinking to myself holy shit this guy ising irrational.
this PC bullshit right? Call liberals "assholes" if you want, but those "assholes" aren't going to poison your water supply, destroy the social safety net, and outsource jobs to make a few bucks at the expense of everyone else. I'm not going to go through a long post about how private charity isn't sustainable on a national scale because it'd be a waste of effort since it would be lost on you just like "no true scotsman."
Sigh, can you go back to your previous interaction pretty please? I am sure you would notice a point where I sayThat's quite the story you've fabricated there. Let's unpack it a little bit.
I know you're going to deny this, but one thing that I purposely do when replying to you is to avoid any kind of insult until you've made the first shot. All you need to do is look back to our previous interactions. Why? Because way back when you first started your know-nothing-ness here, you said that you decided to take a high road after a few barbs and not hurl insults, but then came back within a few posts to go back on your word. That's why every "pillsbury doughboy" or "dimwit" or "small mind" insult thrown my way is a win for me. You simply just don't have the self control and it's quite sad.
In regards to "no true scotsman," I've already given an example and left you a link to do your own research. Hearing it once or twice in school is almost irrelevant when I purposely referenced it like 3 times in what, maybe 4-5 of my last consecutive posts? Sorry, but I can't learn and understand something for you.
As for your last screed about how I rail against Trump and not hitting liberals with the same gusto, well, liberals didn't vote for Trump nor did they support his policies with a vote, so yeah, there's a big difference between who voted for who/what.
Lastly about you being racist, "Proceed Governor." Even in that highly superficial explanation of yours has it's roots in old school racism, which is making a resurgence thanks to Trump, but hey, we should just go back to the day when whites can just call black people niggers because
it, well after you starting your usual trash talking. I specially remember pillsbury came after underoos. So yet again you try and twist the facts. Shameful but no surprise here.Sorry, but you can't separate Trump from his policies, especially when he's been so outspoken about them. Saying that there were black, Hispanic/Latino, and Asians that voted for Trump to excuse what's he campaigned on is again, a very superficial analysis of those votes and demonstrates a huge lack of understanding about those demographics: just because they're minorities doesn't mean that they stick together. Sure, you'd be hard pressed to find a black person that would say that they had it better under slavery, but they're out there. Hell, you'd find Asians that would say that the Japanese deserved internment too. The same would apply to those with origins south of the border. Your glib reply tells me that you know nothing about the inter-ethnic struggles within those groups, not to mention the conflict between those groups. I bet you'd find that a prevailing sentiment of "I'm not a member of the group he's talking about" is a decent part of why members of those groups voted for Trump. A vote for Trump is a vote to support what he campaigned on...and what he campaigned on was ugly.Wow. It's almost like you actually believe that no one could have any other reason to vote for Trump other than "WHITE POWER!". I guess ~10% of African-Americans, and ~30% of Hispanics (both more than Romney, iirc) are Klansmen on the downlow. How horrifying.
Criticizing racists is not an unpopular opinion, it is not anything new, it does not make you an amazing person.
He was the underdog when the majority of pollsters (outside of LA Times and IBD), media pundits, celebrities (still not sure why they are considered defacto political experts given the obvious conflict of interest) and news outlets had him pegged for absolutely no way in hell winning.
How many times were his unfavourability ratings quoted during the campaign? Past a certain point, he was argued to only be popular with rednecks, racists and misogynists.
"Government is not a
All that's happened (outside of his appointments of Priebus and Bannon) is rumours, and if you think the protests (which are largely against him being President at all, #notmypresident) are going to change anything in regard to his picks, I don't know what to tell you. Trump isn't going to be strongarmed like that by people who continue to not respect him or his win, that's obvious. The best we can do is throw out actually good picks to him and voice public support for them. Is that what you're doing? That's what I'm doing.
Never once said both sides are the same (still closer than you think, though). I'm just asking a vocal part of one side to stop being so damn condescending.
As you can see from the decades of commercials, EVERYONE LOVES the Pillsbury Dough Boy, so I take it as a sign of endearment, but I haven't read anything that dishonest or pants-on-head clown shoes in a LONG time. My sincerest thanks.Sigh, can you go back to your previous interaction pretty please? I am sure you would notice a point where I say
No true scotsman, yeah honestly that I do not really care about. We talked about something specific and as always you avoid the substance of the argument. You call those potential people conservatives and when I explain to you that you are wrong you seem to move on instead of actually defending your point. In other words you don't actually know what you are talking about.
I did not vote for Trump either and yet you people seem to want to throw all the blame on us. Why, I honestly do not understand how liberals and democrats do not see the environment they have created. These conditions exist because of both parties, both sides.
So you could not come up with an actual reason? Ok good, well I guess ill just go back to the RNC ghangout. We were talking about republicans should poison the water supply and outsource all the jobs to make a few extra bucks at your expense.
Hey I am not the one who is throwing out accusations and then runs back from them. Maybe next time I ask for a reason you could actually give one.
Define: Irony.
I missed the part where Trump passed the law
So what you're saying is that since he didn't make the law, he doesn't need to hold himself to a higher standard and should just take advantage of a system that he said he'd be fixing? It's one thing to donate to a campaign as a favor, but with your implications, why the
not just straight up bribe the son of a bitch and skip the game all together! I have a better idea, lets have corporations buy ad space on the Senate floor during the State of the Union or have patches on Trump's suit! does Obama have to do with this?
OK at what point do they talk about conservative outrage? I think I missed it.
There are somethings that are just custom, a President is expected to not explicitly seek out conflicts of interest.
The more I think on it the more I've settled into the mindset that Clinton was a truly terrible candidate with a worse campaign strategy that cost her key battleground states. She was running her victory lap weeks before the election and trying to pick up Senate seats for the party instead of treating the election as anything but a sure thing.
He is talking about diplomats arriving and staying at the Trump Hotel to get pay for play. The article talks about how many people avoided it due to the fear of backlash from the Clinton administration should she win. Now they are all trying to get in and paying these ridiculous prices. There might be a few diplomats or foreign officials who think staying at a hotel entitles you to a favor except anyone with common sense realizes its bs. Trump himself is worth $3-10 billion, depending on who you ask, therefore I doubt he cares if you spent $20k at his hotel. Most of these politicians probably do it not to win favors but to show respect and not offend Trump considering his child like mood swings. Detectiveconan talks about Trump getting money to get money, so unless I am wrong but it sounds like he is talking about corruption with zero evidence to back it up.
Ok can you give me these examples in detail?
No surprise here, as always Msut does not answer the questions. Selective reading is really working out for you. Strange that you did not talk about her taxes prior to getting destroyed by Trump but should I expect much from a progressive New Yorker?
Break it down for me then buddy. Give me the details, I want to see if you grasp anything. I will be waiting.
Glad to see you avoiding my questions, once again unable to provide any evidence based on the article we initially talked about.
Ok and baseless accusations without evidence are just that, accusations. Do you want me to get you my dictionary so you can look up the word?
The lone star state. Please do not come here, we already have enough liberals coming from all over the country.
But but emails, and Benghazi.
Oh oh seems you have me confused with a Trump supporter. I never denied he said any of those things. Funny thing is I actually agree with you. GASP. But hey maybe you can go back and comment on the things you posted before when I called you out instead of trying to create a straw man.
Darn that sure must be it, probably why we are getting all these people from other states moving in like crazy.
But he didn't vote for the Holocaust though, he only supported the Rape of Nanking.
!
