[quote name='BattleChicken']Did you.. actually read the post history? There wasn't a single constructive comment in anything that guy has posted. Hyperbole aside, all that user ever seemed to do was attack other people about insignificant, stupid things. Banning someone who consistently went out of their way to run other people down, and never *added* anything to any thread they ever posted in seems reasonable to me. Nobody here should run around roughshod insulting others for no good reason.
Of all the moderators, Gwen is the LEAST likely to go off and ban someone just because she can. There was a clear history of dicketry (not a word, but should be) in the pages of that guy's posts, and I think most would agree she made a wise move.[/QUOTE]
He posted snarky/funny comments. Anyone who would be upset by them has very thin skin. And then to ban him for telling someone to fix a broken link? He was just trying to help. I only read the first page worth of his posts but I didn't see a SINGLE post that was even remotely bannable. If "Gwen" is the least likely to just randomly ban someone, yet she is randomly banning people, that's pretty sad. I can't really compare her to any of the other mods here except Shrike, who I can confirm is a grade-A tool from knowing him on Gametz, but this does provide further proof of the general rule that people who become forum moderators are usually the people who absolutely should NOT be mods.