[quote name='Barnolde']I bought an 80GB PS3 Motorstorm bundle in November and have probably played PS2 games less than 10 times since then.
BC is overrated, though I'll be honest and admit being able to play SotC when I want is nice, especially since it actually runs better on a 80GB, unlike the 360's BC, where the majority of games have graphical and framerate issues.[/quote]
WTF!
People should stop thread crapping and just talk about the deal.
Backward compatibility IS important to some people and NOT to others.
40GB extra space IS important to some people and NOT to others
4 built in USB ports ARE important to some people and NOT to others.
A DS3 IS important to everyone, SONY f-ed that up major with the 6axis.
As for whether PS3 or 360 BC is better, don't speak about what you don't know.
There are JUST as many, if not more, PS2 games that run poorly on PS3 as there are X1 games that run poorly on 360.
Then again there are about 3X more PS2 games on the market so it's comparing apples to oranges.
The games that DO work, work great on BOTH systems.
Every BC game I have tried on BOTH systems has worked perfectly and I have NO compatibility concerns.
MS actually TESTS the BC before they make it available, so percentage wise more of the available BC games SHOULD work properly on 360.
Sony just offers blanket SW emulation which is very hit and miss, or in the case of the 40GB NO BC at all.
The 20/60GB is no longer available so be happy if you have one.
HOWEVER:
360 re-renders BC games in High-Def with Anti-Aliasiang = LOOKS FAB
PS3 upscales the 480i and applies smoothing = Looks ASS
If Sony adds rendering BC PS2 games in HD I'll shit my pants and be very happy.
So there you have it.
For the Record I have a 360 Pro and a PS3 80GB MGS4 bundle hooked HDMI to a 100" 720p projector.
HD rendered BC matters to ME.
I also still have a PS2 and an X1 (XBMC) in another room that my 3 year old plays on.