[quote name='SpazX']
But where do you draw the line really? I have debts (student loans), all extra money could go toward paying down those debts until they were eliminated, but that would suck. So for me it's just that I'm not going to build up
more debt for unnecessary shit, although I could possibly be paying down current debt if I didn't buy it. It's still irrational and in the end will cost me more money in interest. There's still a measure of immediate vs. delayed gratification.
At the same time I've built up some savings, but if instead I used all of that money to pay off my loans they'd be half paid now. But then if some shit happened and I needed money then I'd be

ed. So there's planning for unforeseeable events, which will also ultimately lead me to paying more money in interest on loans.
[/QUOTE]
No, you're doing it right IMO. It's just the nature of life in the US today for the typical 20-30 year old. You're going to probably have student loan debt, probably going to have a mortgage, maybe a car loan etc.
That doesn't mean you can't spend money on entertainment and luxuries. It just means that you have to spend every spare cent paying down debt and living like a poor person. It means pay at least (and ideally a bit more) than the minimum payments on all your debts, put a set amount in savings, and then you can spend on luxuries after other necessities like food etc. are paid for.
The problem is people who live paycheck to paycheck, paying the minimum (or less and getting behind) on debts, aren't putting anything in savings, but yet blow money on luxuries.
You're doing the same I and others do. Focus on paying debts, building some savings, and spending some left over money on luxuries. That's pretty much the definition of living with in ones means--as long as the debts are things like student loans, mortgage on a house with in your means etc. Not credit card debt from buying TVs etc.
[quote name='SpazX']If somebody changes
later from reasonable to unreasonable then doing this shit beforehand isn't really going to matter (besides a prenup, I guess).[/QUOTE]
Yep, and FoC will say that's what happened to him. i.e. see him asking DoK how long she and her husband have been married.
Age could have a lot to do with it too. If you get married during or right after college etc., you won't have much idea of how the person will deal with debts, budgeting and other pressures of entering real life.
I'm adjusting too it myself, just finishing grad school last summer. Through college etc. most people are just living on tight budget, many times provided by parents, scholarships, student loans etc. and not thinking of saving money, paying down debt etc.
So I think that's why a lot of married couples end up with disagreements over finances. They get married at ages before either of them really have experience with managing money, dealing with debts etc. so it's hard to know for sure where each person will stand on those fronts.
[quote name='javeryh']Of course this won't solve everyone's problems but it is a start. Too many people spend every penny they make instead of setting some aside for an emergency or whatever may come up (or for their own future). I work with morons who make hundreds of thousands a year and are still living paycheck to paycheck because they are living above their means.
[/QUOTE]
Yep, you shouldn't spend a dime on luxuries unless you're paying down your debts, paying all your bills and other necessities, and putting some money in savings. After that you can budget some discretionary income for luxuries.
[quote name='ritchardf']funny thing is, if everyone lived within their means, we would all be without jobs. face it consumption drives capitalism, drives commerce, drives jobs. so we cut consumption, which cuts demand, which cuts production, which cuts jobs, which cuts taxes going into government, spiraling until collapsing on top of itself[/QUOTE]
Yep, and that's why our economy will eventually crash IMO. It's far too much based on consumerism and selling people luxury goods and services they don't need. When things get tough, most people tighten their belts and cut back spending on such things. Which is why it's still tough for retail even with the economy slowly bouncing back. There will be a lag before people as a whole are throwing the same levels of money at luxuries as they were a couple years ago.